Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:40:11.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atrazine Movement in Soil Columns as Influenced by Starch-Encapsulation and Acrylic Polymer Additives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gwen F. Fleming ,
F. William Simmons ,
Loyd M. Wax ,
Robert E. Wing  and
Merle E. Carr
Gwen F. Fleming
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ill.
F. William Simmons
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Crop. Prot. Res., 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Crop. Prot. Res., 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Robert E. Wing
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Nat. Ctr. for Agric. Util. Res., Peoria, IL 61604
Merle E. Carr
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Nat. Ctr. for Agric. Util. Res., Peoria, IL 61604
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alternative herbicide formulations may have the potential to reduce atrazine leaching. This study was conducted to determine if starch-encapsulation produced using an extrusion process or several acrylic polymer additives reduced atrazine leaching in soil columns packed with Plainfield sand (98% sand and 0.7% organic matter). Three watering regimes were evaluated to determine the effects of water volume and rate of application on atrazine movement When 7.6 cm of water (0.44-pore volumes) was applied over 2 h, polymer treatments reduced atrazine movement from the soil surface by 9 to 21% compared to atrazine without the additives. With increased water volume and time, the effectiveness of several polymer treatments diminished. Acrysol ASE-108 and G110 polymers (mixed with atrazine at a 1:1 ratio) most effectively reduced atrazine leaching over all watering regimes. Starch encapsulation was more effective than any polymer additive in retarding atrazine movement Increasing the water volume from 7.6 to 15.2 cm (0.88-pore volumes) did not increase leaching of starch-encapsulated atrazine. Ninety-nine percent of the starch-encapsulated atrazine was retained in the top 5 cm of the column compared to only 18 and 13% of the dry flowable formulation (DF) when 0.44- and 0.88-pore volumes of water were applied over 2 and 4 h, respectively. When 0.88-pore volumes of water were applied over 12 d, 81% of the starch-encapsulated atrazine was retained in the upper 5 cm of the column compared to only 5% of the DF formulation of atrazine. This study indicates that starch encapsulation reduces atrazine movement to a greater extent than polymer additives and suggests that starch encapsulation may be an effective method of reducing atrazine leaching.

Keywords

Atrazine6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineSoil columnsleachingcontrolled release formulations
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 465 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carr, M. E., Wing, R. E., and Doane, W. M. 1991. Encapsulation of atrazine within a starch matrix by extrusion processing. Cereal Chem. 68:262–266.Google Scholar
2. Cohen, S. Z., Elden, C., and Lorber, M. N. 1986. Monitoring ground water for pesticides. Pages 170–196 in Evaluation of Pesticides in Groundwater. Garner, W. Y., Honeycutt, R. C., and Nigg, H. N., eds. ACS Symp. Ser. No. 315, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lavy, T. L., Roeth, F. W., and Fenster, C. R. 1973. Degradation of 2,4-D and atrazine at three soil depths in the field. J. Environ. Qual. 2:132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17:202–205.Google Scholar
5. Richard, J. J., Junk, G. A., Avery, M. J., Nehring, N. L., Fritz, J. S., and Svec, H. J. 1975. Analysis of various Iowa waters for selected pesticides: atrazine, DDE, and dieldrin-1974. Pestic. Monit. J. 9(3)117–123.Google Scholar
6. Riggle, B. D. and Penner, D. 1988. Controlled release of three herbicides with kraft lignin PC940C. Weed Sci. 36:131–136.Google Scholar
7. Ritter, W. F. 1986. Pesticide contamination of groundwater—a review. ASAE Paper No. 86-2028. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
8. SAS Institute, Inc. 1986. Pages 159–174 in SAS System for Linear Models. 1986 ed. Crum, L., ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
9. Schoppet, M. J., Gish, T. J., and Helling, C. S. 1989. Effect of starch encapsulation on atrazine mobility in small undisturbed soil columns. ASAE Paper No. 89-2507. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
10. Schreiber, M. M., Shasha, B. S., Trimnell, D., and White, M. D. 1987. Controlled release herbicides. Pages 177–191 in Methods of Applying Herbicides. McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. WSSA Monogr. 4.Google Scholar
11. Shasha, B. S., Trimnell, D., and Otey, F. H. 1981. Encapsulation of pesticides in a starch-calcium adduct. J. Polym. Sci. 19:1891–1899.Google Scholar
12. Shasha, B. S., Doane, W. M., and Russell, C. R. 1976. Starch encapsulated pesticides for slow release. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. ed. 14:417–420.Google Scholar
13. Street, J. E., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Effects of adjuvants on behavior of metribuzin in soil and soybean injury. Weed Sci. 35:422–426.Google Scholar
14. Trimnell, D., Shasha, B. S., Wing, R. E., and Otey, F. H. 1982. Pesticide encapsulation using a starch-borate complex as wall material. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 27:3919–3929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Agricultural Chemicals in Ground Water: Proposed Pesticide Strategy. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC. 150 pp.Google Scholar
16. Wauchope, D. R., Glaze, N. C., and Dowler, C. C. 1990. Mobility and efficacy of controlled-release formulations of atrazine. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 30:216.Google Scholar
17. Wietersen, R. C., Daniel, T. C., and Fermanich, K. J. 1990. Addition of a polymer to herbicide application mixtures: effect on herbicide leaching through sandy soil. Agron. Abstr. Page 51.Google Scholar
18. Wing, R. E., Maiti, S., and Doane, W. M. 1987. Effectiveness of jet-cooked pearl cornstarch as a controlled release matrix. Starch/Stärke 39:422–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar