Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:36:06.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavior of Amiben and Dinoben Derivatives in Arkansas Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas
R. L. Runyan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas
H. R. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas

Abstract

The influence of six Arkansas soils on the leaching characteristics of derivatives of 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben) and 3-nitro-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (hereinafter referred to as dinoben) in slotted soil columns was determined using large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] bioassay. The ammonium and aluminum salts of amiben and the sodium salt of dinoben were easily leached and leaching was not noticeably affected by soil type. The ammonium salt of amiben was not adsorbed, while the methyl ester of amiben was adsorbed by these soils. Adsorption was related to the clay and organic matter content of the soil. Methyl and butoxyethyl ester derivatives of amiben and dinoben resisted leaching in these soils and the amide of amiben was intermediate in leaching. The adsorption and leaching behavior of the ester derivatives of these compounds were complicated by their rapid hydrolysis in these soils. The hydrolyzed product behaved identically to the salt derivatives of the compounds in leaching, adsorption, and chromatographic properties. Hydrolysis of the methyl ester was inhibited by soil sterilization, dry soil, and temperatures below 20 C. In non-sterile, warm, moist soil, the half-life of the methyl ester of amiben was 28 hr. Four species of Bacillus were capable of hydrolyzing the methyl ester of amiben in pure culture studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carson, J. E. 1961. Soil temperature and weather conditions. U. S. Agronne Nat. Laboratory, Lemont, Ill. 244 p.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1966. Fate of the amide and methyl ester of amiben in soybean plants and soil. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:619626.Google Scholar
3. Donaldson, T. W. and Foy, C. L. 1965. The phytotoxicity and persistence in soils of benzoic acid herbicides. Weeds 13:195202.Google Scholar
4. Lambert, S. M., Porter, P. E., and Schienferstein, R. H. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to the soil. Weeds 13:185190.Google Scholar
5. King, L. J. 1957. Substituted aryloxy-alkanol derivatives for use as biological activated preemergence herbicides. Proc. 4th Internat. Congr. of Crop Protection, p. 557564.Google Scholar
6. McLane, S. R., Mitchell, C. B., and Parkins, M. D. 1967. Amiben derivatives on various crops. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 20:164170.Google Scholar
7. Rauser, W. E. and Switzer, C. M. 1962. Factors contributing to the loss of amiben phytotoxicity in soils. Weeds 10:6264.Google Scholar
8. Schliebe, K. A., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1965. Dissipation of amiben. Weeds 13:321325.Google Scholar
9. Sheets, T. J. 1963. Photochemical alteration and inactivation of amiben. Weeds 11:186190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Talbert, R. E. 1967. The relative selectivity of some soil applied herbicides in soybeans. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 20:375379.Google Scholar
11. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:4652.Google Scholar
12. Waksman, S. A. 1952. Soil microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 356 p.Google Scholar
13. Warren, G. F. 1963. Adsorption of amiben in soils. The Hormolog 4:1516.Google Scholar