Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:51:34.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological control of plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoides L.) in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Susana R. Feldman
Susana R. Feldman*
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Biología General, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, C.C.14, 2123 Zavalla, República Argenrina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plumeless thistle is a European Asteraceae naturalized in Argentina, where it is a troublesome pasture and range weed. A European weevil (Rhinocyllus conicus) was imported for biocontrol of this thistle. Oviposition patterns, egg to adult survival, and the weevil's effect on the production of achenes by thistles were monitored over 2 yr. The oviposition period did not begin simultaneously in all thistle populations, but finished in late November. Egg to larvae survival was 63% and egg to adult survival was approximately 50%. No important egg predators were detected. The weevils destroyed 80% of the propagules per capitulum and showed a slight tendency to adapt to the plumeless thistle cycle.

Keywords

Plumeless thistle, Carduus acanthoides L. CRUACmusk thistle, Carduus nutans L. CRUNUbull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore CIRVUweevil, Rhinocyllus conicus FroelichCRUACCRUNUCIRVU
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , August 1997 , pp. 534 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Begon, M., Harper, J. P., and Townsend, C. R. 1990. Ecology. Individuals, Populations and Communities. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publishers. 945 p.Google Scholar
Brizuela, M. A. and Cid, M. S. 1991. Enmalezamiento con cardos de una pastura de festuca alta (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) en relación a la carga animal. Rev. Argent. Prod. Anim. 11(2): 129–134.Google Scholar
Cámara de Sanidad Agropecuaria y Eertilizantes de la República Argentina. 1995. Guía de productos fitosanitarios para la República Argentina. CASAFA: 295, 308, 674, 810.Google Scholar
Enrique de Briano, A. E. 1987. Establecimiento y dispersión en Castelar (Prov. de Buenos Aires) del gorgojo Rhynocillus conicus agente de control biológico del cardo pendiente y del cardo. Acintacnia 3(27): 64–66.Google Scholar
Enrique de Briano, A. E., Cordo, H. A., de Crouzel, I. S., and Gimenez Tanzi, M. R. 1983. Importación de Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich y Trichosirocalus horridus Panzer para el control biológico de los cardos en la Argentina. Malezas 11(1): 233–241.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. R. and Lewis, J. P. 1990. Output and dispersal of propagules of Carduus acanthoides L. Weed Res. 30: 161–169.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. R., Vesprini, J. L., and Lewis, J. P. 1994. Establishment and survival of Carduus acanthoides . Weed Res. 34: 265–273.Google Scholar
Kok, L. T. and Mays, W. T. 1991. Successsful biological control of plumeless thistle, Carduus acanthoides L. (Campanulatae: Asteraceae (= Compositae)), by Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in VA. Biol. Control 1: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, L. T. and Surles, W. W. 1975. Successful biocontrol of musk thistle by an introduced weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus . Environ. Entomol. 4: 1025–1027.Google Scholar
Leonardi, C. C. 1982. Control de malezas en pasturas. Malezas 10(3): 30–42.Google Scholar
McCarty, M. K. and Hatting, J. L. 1975. Effects of herbicides or mowing on musk thistle seed productions. Weed Res. 15: 363–367.Google Scholar
Molinari, A., Feldman, S. R., and Vesprini, J. L. 1993. Establecimiento de Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en un área del sureste de la provincia de Santa Fe (Argentina). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 53(1-4): 21–23.Google Scholar
Perez, M. B. 1991. Desarrollo e implementación de sistemas de control de malezas en pasturas cultivadas. Buenos Aires. XII Reunión Argentina sobre la Maleza y su Control: 5–6.Google Scholar
Rees, N. E. 1990. Establishment, dispersal and influence of Ceutorhynchus litura on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense in the Gallatin Valley of Montana. Weed Sci. 38: 198–200.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Chancellor, R. J. 1979. Periodicity of seedling emergence and achene survival in some species of Carduus, Cirsium and Onopordum . J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 641–648.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. J. and Kok, L. T. 1984. Potential of Rhinocyllus conicus to the plumeless thistle Carduus acanthoides in Virginia. VA J. of Sci. 35: 192–196.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1979. Biometría. Blume, H., ed. Madrid: H. Blume. 832 p.Google Scholar
Sola, S. 1983. Relevamiento de malezas en la implantación de pasturas culitivadas. ASAM (Asociación Argentina para el control de Malezas) 11(1): 142–155.Google Scholar
Surles, W. W., Kok, L. T., and Pienkowski, R. L. 1974. Rhinocyllus conicus establishment for biocontrol of thistles in Virginia. Weed Sci. 22: 1–3.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P. 1984. Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel) (Col: Curculionidae), a succesful agent for biocontrol of the thistle Carduus nutans L. Z. Angew. Ent. 97: 36–52.Google Scholar