Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:32:40.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broom Snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) Control with Picloram and Metsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kirk C. McDaniel
Affiliation:
Dep. Animal and Range Sci., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003
Keith W. Duncan
Affiliation:
Coop. Ext. Serv., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003

Abstract

Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) and metsulfuron {2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl] benzoic acid} were applied to broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae [Pursh.] Britt. and Rusby # GUESA) on two spring dates and three fall dates from October 1983 to 1985. Applications of picloram and metsulfuron in the fall more effectively controlled broom snakeweed than applications in the spring. Lower herbicide rates were necessary for 90% or greater control on a sandy loam than on a silty clay loam. Grass yield increased significantly the first, second, and third growing seasons when a majority of the broom snakeweed were killed by either herbicide, but was not different from untreated rangeland when less than 50% of the plants were killed. Reduction in broom snakeweed densities of 90% or greater following applications of picloram or metsulfuron resulted in 3- to 5-fold increases in the estimated carrying capacity of rangeland in east-central New Mexico.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technolgy
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, C. D. and Kothmann, M. M. 1979. Effect of level of stocking pressure on forage intake and diet quality of range cattle. Proc. West. Sec., Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 30:174178.Google Scholar
2. Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant communities: A Textbook of Plant Synecology. Harper and Row, New York. 300 pp.Google Scholar
3. Dwyer, D. D. 1967. Fertilization and burning of blue grama grass. J. Anim. Sci. 29:934.Google Scholar
4. Gesink, R. W., Alley, H. P., and Lee, G. A. 1973. Vegetative response to chemical control of broom snakeweed on a blue grama range. J. Range Manage. 26:139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. McDaniel, K. C., Pieper, R. D., and Donart, G. B. 1982. Grass response following thinning of broom snakeweed. J. Range Manage. 35:219222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McDaniel, K. C. and Loomis, L. E. 1984. Livestock poisoning by perennial snakeweed. Weeds Today 16:911.Google Scholar
7. Platt, K. B. 1959. Plant control — some possibilities and limitations. J. Range Manage. 12:6468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schmutz, E. M. and Little, D. E. 1970. Effect of 2,4,5-T and picloram on broom snakeweed in Arizona. J. Range Manage. 23:354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schmutz, E. M., Cable, D. R., and Worwick, J. J. 1959. Effects of shrub removal on the vegetation of a semidesert grass-shrub range. J. Range Manage. 12:3437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush Management. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, TX. 360 pp.Google Scholar
11. Torell, L. A., Gordon, H. W., McDaniel, K. C., and McGinty, A. 1986. Economic impacts of broom snakeweed infestations. Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Westview Press, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
12. Ueckert, D. N. 1979. Broom snakeweed: Effect on shortgrass forage production and soil water depletion. J. Range Manage. 32:216219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ueckert, D. N., Whisenant, B. G., and Sultemeier, G. W. 1983. Control of rayless goldenrod with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31:143147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Vallentine, J. F. 1971. Range Development and Improvements. Brigham Young Univ. Press, Provo, UT. 516 pp.Google Scholar