Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:23:12.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Triazine-Resistant Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi) and its Control in No-tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald L. Ritter
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Maryland, College Park. MD 20742
Lisa M. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Maryland, College Park. MD 20742
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
William P. Novitzky
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
Donald E. Moreland
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695

Abstract

Triazine-resistant giant foxtail was identified in 1984 near Delta, PA. In field studies conducted from 1985 to 1987, preemergence applications of atrazine with cyanazine or simazine provided poor (≤60%) season-long control of this annual grass in no-tillage corn. Best season-long preemergence control was obtained with metolachlor or microencapsulated formulations of alachlor or EPTC. Postemergence applications of cyanazine or tridiphane + atrazine + crop oil provided poor giant foxtail control. Postdirected applications of paraquat resulted in fair (≥70%) control of giant foxtail through midseason. In greenhouse studies, triazineresistant (R) giant foxtail tolerated preemergence applications of atrazine or simazine at dosages to 9.0 kg ai/ha. Triazine-sensitive (S) giant foxtail was injured by 2.2 kg/ha and higher rates of atrazine and simazine. In laboratory studies, the I50 for inhibition by atrazine of photoinduced electron transport in thylakoids isolated from S and R biotypes was determined to be 0.24 and 205 μM, respectively. The differential sensitivity was paralleled by simazine. However, the limited solubility of simazine prevented determination of an I50 value with thylakoids from the R biotype.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armond, P. A., Arntzen, C. J., Briantais, J. M., and Vernotte, C. 1976. Differentiation of chloroplast lamellae. I. Light harvesting efficiency and grana development. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 175:5463.Google Scholar
2. Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:115.Google Scholar
3. Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Steinback, K. E. 1982. The mechanism of chloroplast triazine resistance: Alterations in the site of herbicide action. Pages 185214 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide resistant weeds in North America. Pages 930 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:321325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fuerst, E. P., Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Penner, D. 1986. Herbicide cross-resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of four species. Weed Sci. 34:344353.Google Scholar
7. Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1986. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:440443.Google Scholar
8. Gressel, J., Ammon, H. U., Fogelfors, H., Gasquez, J., Kay, Q.O.N., and Kees, H. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds outside North America. Pages 3155 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:2629.Google Scholar
10. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331334.Google Scholar
11. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281293.Google Scholar
12. Ort, D. R., Ahrens, W. H., Martin, B., and Stoller, E. W. 1983. Comparison of photosynthetic performance in triazine-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Amaranthus hybridus . Plant Physiol. 72:925930.Google Scholar
13. Pfister, K. and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. The mode of action of photosystem II-specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Z. Naturforsch. 34c:9961009.Google Scholar
14. Ritter, R. L., Harris, T. C., and Varano, W. J. 1985. Influence of herbicides and tillage on the control of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) in corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:400404.Google Scholar
15. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614616.Google Scholar
16. Yaacoby, T., Schonfeld, M., and Rubin, B. 1985. Triazine-resistant grass weeds and their response to herbicides. Phytoparasitica 13:34.Google Scholar
17. Yaacoby, T., Schonfeld, M., and Rubin, B. 1986. Characteristics of triazine-resistant biotypes of three grass weeds. Weed Sci. 34:181184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar