Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:42:28.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorsulfuron for Weed Control in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Randy L. Anderson
Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Akron, CO 80720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide} was nontoxic to safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) when applied postemergence in 1983 and 1984 at 0.018 and 0.035 kg ai/ha. Trifluralin [2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] at 1.1 and 1.7 kg ai/ha and pronamide [3,5-dichloro(N-1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide] at 0.8 and 1.1 kg ai/ha were applied previously as preplant soil-incorporated treatments. In both years, safflower was relatively free of weeds where trifluralin was applied alone or in sequential treatments with chlorsulfuron. Pronamide, with or without chlorsulfuron, failed to completely control witchgrass (Panicum capillare L. ♯ PANCA) in 1 yr; thus safflower grain yields were reduced 21 to 35% when compared to weed-free safflower. Chlorsulfuron controlled redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L. ♯ AMARE), puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris L. ♯ TRBTE), and common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. ♯ HELAN).

Keywords

PhytotoxicitygerminationPanicum capillareAmaranthus retroflexusTribulus terrestrisHelianthus annuusPANCAAMARETRBTEHELAN
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , November 1985 , pp. 840 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hamilton, K. C. 1979. Persistence of annual applications of herbicides in winter-planted safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Weed Sci. 27:655–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Leavitt, G. 1983. Sulfonylureas: new high potency herbicides. Pages 243–250 in Miyamoto, J. et al., eds. IUPAC Pesticide Chemistry. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
3. Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Pages 115–124.Google Scholar
4. Martin, J. H., Leonard, W. H., and Stamp, D. L. 1976. Principles of Field Crop Production. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York. Pages 977–980.Google Scholar
5. Mukhopadhyay, S. K. and Ghosh, D. C. 1981. Weeds and their control in oil seed crops. Pesticides 15:6–11.Google Scholar
6. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, T. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 683 pp.Google Scholar
7. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Viste, K. L., Crovetti, A. J., and Horrom, B. W. 1970. Dimethylpropynylbenzamides: A new group of herbicides. Sci. 167:280–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Yih, R. Y., Swithenbank, C., and McRae, D. H. 1970. Transformation of the herbicide N-(1,1-dimethylpropynyl)-3,5-dichlorobenzamide in soil. Weed Sci. 18:604–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar