Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:37:43.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of ALS inhibitor resistance and allelic interactions in shattercane accessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chad D. Lee ,
Alex R. Martin ,
Fred W. Roeth ,
Blaine E. Johnson  and
Donald J. Lee
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Fred W. Roeth
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, South Central Extension and Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933
Blaine E. Johnson
Affiliation:
HybriTech Seed International, Berthoud, CO 80513
Donald J. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Reports of unacceptable shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) control with acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides prompted the investigation of 29 fields in central and south-central Nebraska for ALS-resistant (ALSr) shattercane. These fields were located in three distinct geographical areas designated C, G, and P. Shattercane from 13 fields spanning all three areas was resistant to 80 g ai ha−1 (2 X field rate) primisulfuron. Accessions C and G were more resistant than accession P to primisulfuron and nicosulfuron. Accessions C and G were susceptible to imazethapyr, whereas accession P was resistant. The ALS resistance was associated with alterations in the ALS enzyme. Primisulfuron I50 values for ALS from ROX (forage sorghum), C, G, and P were 7, 8,510, 8,870, and 714 nM, respectively; nicosulfuron I50 values were 647, 4,110, 4,070, and 1,460 nM, respectively; and imazethapyr I50 values were 5,440, 13,100, 11,800, and 51,700 nM, respectively. Based on cross-resistance and enzyme sensitivities, at least two biotypes are represented in the three accessions of ALSr shattercane. Shattercane individuals from accessions C, G, and P were intercrossed to determine if the ALSr genes in each of the accessions were at independent loci. All the F2 populations were resistant to 80 g ai ha−1 primisulfuron, suggesting that the ALSr alleles in the three accessions are at the same locus or possibly linked loci. When the C, G, and P accessions were crossed with the wild type (WT), comparisons between the F1, susceptible, and resistant populations showed that primisulfuron resistance was expressed as a dominant, partially dominant, and additive trait for the C, G, and P accessions, respectively. The differences in ALSr allelic interactions indicate that primisulfuron resistance developed independently in each of the three accessions.

Keywords

Imazethapyrnicosulfuronprimisulfuronshattercane, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench SORVUforage sorghum, S. bicolor ‘Rox orange'.ALSherbicide resistanceSORVU
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 275 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldrich, P. R. and Doebley, J. 1992. Restriction fragment variation in the nuclear and chloroplast genomes of cultivated and wild Sorghum bicolor . Theor. Appl. Genet. 885:293–302.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Baumgartner, J. R., Peterson, D. E., and Currie, R. S. 1998. Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Sci. 46:403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. D. 1998. Physiological and Genetic Attributes on an Acetolactate Synthase Resistant Shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, pp. 63–118.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. D., Nissen, S. J., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 1998a. Mechanism of primisulfuron resistance in a shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) biotype. Weed Sci. 46:158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. D., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 1998h. Discovery of a primisulfuron-resistant shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) biotype. Weed Technol. 12:74–77.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, P., Woodworth, A. R., Rosen, B. A., Subramanian, M. V., and Siehl, D. L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:17381–17385.Google Scholar
Boutsalis, P. and Powles, S. 1995. Inheritance and mechanism of resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate synthase in Sonchus oleraceus L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:242–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1965. Seed and Phenological Studies with Shattercane. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 220. 37 p.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1970. Control of wild cane in corn. Weed Sci. 18:272–275.Google Scholar
Currie, R. S., Kwon, C. S., and Penner, D. 1995. Magnitude of resistance of corn (Zea mays) hybrid with altered acetolactate synthase. Weed Sci. 43:578–582.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Maries, M.A.S., and Hall, L. M. 1991. Inhibition of acetolactate synthase in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Stellaria media . Pestic. Sci. 31:273–280.Google Scholar
de Wet, J. M. 1978. Systematics and evolution of sorghum sect. sorghum (Gramineae). Am. J. Bot. 65:477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doggett, H. H. 1970. The history, origins and classification of sorghum. Pages 1–49 in Dogget, H. H., ed. Sorghum. London: Logmans, Green.Google Scholar
Dufour, P., Grivet, L., D'-Hont, A., Deu, M., Trouche, G., Glaszmann, J. C., and Hamon, P. 1996. Comparative genetic mapping between duplicated segments on maize chromosomes 3 and 8 and homologous regions in sorghum and sugarcane. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:1024–1030.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R. 1991. Genetic principles. Pages 26–58 in Fehr, W. R., ed. Principles of Cultivar Development. Volume 1. Theory and Technique. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fellows, G. M. and Roeth, F. W. 1992. Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 4:68–73.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. 1997. Varying surfactant type changes quizalofop-P herbicidal activity. Weed Technol. 11:298–302.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D., and Hoffman, D. L. 1992. DNA sequence variation in Domain A of the acetolactate synthase genes of herbicide-resistant and -susceptible weed biotypes. Weed Sci. 40:670–676.Google Scholar
Harms, C., Montoya, A., Privalle, L., and Briggs, R. 1990. Genetic and biochemical characterization of corn inbred lines tolerant to the sulfonylurea herbicide primisulfuron. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:353–358.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., Saunders, J. W., and Penner, D. 1993. Semidominant nature of monogenic sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 41:317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattori, J., Rutledge, R., Labbe, H., Brown, D., Sunohara, G., and Miki, B. 1992. Multiple resistance to sulfonylureas and imidazolinones conferred by an acetohydroxyacid synthase gene with separate mutations for selective resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 232:167–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinz, J. R. and Owen, M.D.K. 1996. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in corn (Zea mays) and two annual grass weeds. Weed Sci. 44:219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192–195.Google Scholar
House, L. R. 1985. Sorghum improvement: methods and procedures. Pages 73–151 in House, L. R., ed. A Guide to Sorghum Breeding. 2nd ed. India: International Crops Research institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C., Thill, D., and Dial, M. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163–168.Google Scholar
Morden, C. W., Doebley, J., and Schertz, K. F. 1990. Allozyme variation among the spontaneous species of sorghum section sorghum (Poaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:296–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newhouse, K., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. 1991. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops. Pages 139–150 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Saari, L., Cotterman, J., and Primiani, M. 1990. Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol. 93:55–61.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Smith, W. F., and Primiani, M. M. 1992. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42:110–118.Google Scholar
Sabatka, R. G. 1993. Exploring the Possibility of Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) Resistant to Primisulfuron and the Influence of Relative Humidity on Primisulfuron Efficacy. M.S. thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, pp. 16–45.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. V. 1990. Acetolactate synthase, mechanism of action and its herbicide binding site. Pestic. Sci. 29:283–292.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1991. Mechanisms of resistance to acetolactate synthase/acetohydroxyacid synthase inhibitors. Pages 187–198 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:241–247.Google Scholar
Stidham, M. 1991. Herbicides that inhibit acetohydroxyacid synthase. Weed Sci. 39:428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose-response curves and statistical models. Pages 29–55 in Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, C., Thill, D., and Shafii, B. 1994. Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42:172–179.Google Scholar
Weerakoon, L. K., Weber, D. F., and Scneerman, M. C. 1993. Estimating genetic relatedness of maize to twenty-three plant species by RFLP analysis. Maydica 38:231–237.Google Scholar
Westerfield, W. W. 1945. A colorimetric determination of blood acetoin. J. Biol. Chem. 495–502.Google Scholar