Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-kjzhn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:05:17.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition Between Sugarbeets and Five Densities of Kochia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. M. Weatherspoon  and
E. E. Schweizer
D. M. Weatherspoon
Affiliation:
Botany and Plant Pathology Dep., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins Dyersburg State Community College, Dyersburg, Tennessee
E. E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr. in cooperation with the Botany and Plant Pathology Dep., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a 2-year study, five densities of kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) competed with sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.) for the entire growing season. The yield of sugarbeet roots and pounds of sucrose per acre decreased as the intensity of competition from kochia plants increased. One kochia plant per 25 ft of row reduced the average yield of roots by 2.6 T/A and sucrose by 960 lb/A. A density of one kochia plant, or more, per 2 ft of row in the first year, or one kochia plant per 1 ft of row in the second year, significantly reduced the sucrose content of the roots. Individual kochia plants significantly reduced the weight of sugarbeet tops and roots within a radius of 31 inches from the center of the sugarbeet row.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , March 1971 , pp. 125 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1968. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds, 1965. U. S. Dep. Agr. ARS 34–102. 85 p.Google Scholar
2. Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brimhall, P. B., Chamberlain, E. W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competition of annual weeds and sugarbeets. Weeds 13:33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Donald, C. M. 1961. Competition for light in crops and pastures, p. 282–313. In Mechanisms in Biological Competition. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symposia 15. Academic Press, New York. 365 p.Google Scholar
6. Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R., and Anderson, L. E. 1969. Yellow foxtail competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 17:211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R., and Anderson, L. E. 1969. Tall waterhemp competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 17: 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Schweizer, E. E. and Weatherspoon, D. M. 1968. Herbicidal control of weeds in sugarbeets. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 15:263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sullivan, E. F., Decker, P. J., and Dollarschell, T. L. 1968. Phenmedipham weed control responses in sugarbeets. Proc.' North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 23:22–24.Google Scholar
12. Weatherspoon, D. M. and Schweizer, E. E. 1969. Competition between kochia and sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 17:464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Weatherspoon, D. M. and Schweizer, E. E. 1970. Control of kochia in sugarbeets with benzadox. Weed Sci. 18:183–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Zimdahl, R. L. and Fertig, S. N. 1967. Influence of weed competition on sugarbeets. Weeds 15:336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar