Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:39:52.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of Spurred Anoda, Velvetleaf, Prickly Sida, and Venice Mallow in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J.M. Chandler
J.M. Chandler*
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spurred anoda [Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht.], velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic), prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.) and Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum L.) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 213′) was studied during 1973 and 1974. Cotton height was reduced by full-season competition of all species at a density greater than 32 plants/12 m of crop row. Full-season cotton competition reduced the dry matter production of velvetleaf, spurred anoda, prickly sida, and Venice mallow at weed densities less than 8, 16, 32, or 64 plants/12 m of crop row, respectively. Full-season competition resulted in seed cotton yield reductions by spurred anoda, velvetleaf, and prickly sida at 8, 16, and 64, plants/12 m of crop row, respectively. Competition from 2 weeks after cotton emergence until harvest by spurred anoda at 16 plants/12 m, and velvetleaf or prickly sida at 64 plants/12 m, reduced yields. Spurred anoda, velvetleaf, or prickly sida competition 4 to 6 weeks after cotton emergence until harvest did not reduce the seed cotton yields. Venice mallow competition did not reduce yields at any density or competition period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 151 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1973. Effect of annual weeds on furrow-irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 21:325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Black, J.N. 1960. The significance of petiole length, leaf area, and light interception in competition between strains of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) grown in swards. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 11:277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.Google Scholar
5. Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buchanan, G.A. and McLaughlin, R.D. 1975. Influence of nitrogen on weed competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 23:324–328.Google Scholar
7. Chandler, J.M. and Dale, J.E. 1974. Comparative growth of four Malavacae species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:116–116.Google Scholar
8. Chawan, D.D. and Sen, D.N. 1975. Photoperiods in relation to growth behavior of two desert species of Sida . Indian Sci. Cong. Assoc. Proc. 59:381.Google Scholar
9. Deschenes, J.M. 1974. Intraspecific competition in experimental populations of weeds. Can. J. Bot. 52:1415–1421.Google Scholar
10. Eaton, B.J. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Eaton, B.J., Russ, O.G., and Feltner, K.C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Fernald, M.L. 1970. Gray's manual of botany. Van Nostrand Rein-hold Co., New York. 1000 pp.Google Scholar
13. Holiday, R. 1960. Plant population and crop yields. Nature (London) 186:22–24.Google Scholar
14. Ivy, H.W. and Baker, R.S. 1972. Prickly sida control and competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137–139.Google Scholar
15. Palmbald, I.G. 1968. Competition in experimental populations of weeds with emphasis on the regulation of population size. Ecology 49:26–34.Google Scholar
16. Robinson, E.L. 1976. Yield and height of cotton as affected by weed density and nitrogen level. Weed Sci. 24:40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Smith, D.T. and Tseng, U.H. 1970. Cotton development and yield as related to pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) density. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. 24:37–38.Google Scholar
18. Staniforth, D.W. and Weber, C.R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yeild of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.Google Scholar