Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:30:08.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concentration of 2,4,5-T, Triclopyr, Picloram, and Clopyralid in Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) Stems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney W. Bovey ,
Hugo Hein Jr.  and
Robert E. Meyer
Rodney W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Headquartered at Grassland, Soil and Water Res. Lab., Temple, TX 76503
Hugo Hein Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Headquartered at Grassland, Soil and Water Res. Lab., Temple, TX 76503
Robert E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Headquartered at Grassland, Soil and Water Res. Lab., Temple, TX 76503
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Triclopyr {[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid}, 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid), and clopyralid (3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) were applied to honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr. # PRCJG) on seven different dates about every 3 weeks from May to September in 1980 and 1981. Concentrations of 2,4,5-T or triclopyr in stem tissue were usually less than 2 μg/g fresh weight regardless of date of application. Concentrations of picloram and clopyralid were as high as 11 and 22 μg/g fresh weight, respectively, in upper stem phloem at some dates of application. Higher concentrations of all herbicides were detected in upper stem phloem than in the upper stem xylem or basal stem phloem or xylem. More herbicide tended to be detected in stems when herbicides were applied early (May and June) than late (August and September) in the season. Concentrations of triclopyr and picloram recovered from honey mesquite stems were about 25% greater at 3 than at 30 days after treatment, whereas concentrations of 2,4,5-T and clopyralid were about 50% greater at 3 than at 30 days after application.

Keywords

Herbicide residue in phloemtranslocationherbicide in xylemPRCJG
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 211 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. and Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1980. Effectiveness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 34:666–670.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., and Baur, J. R. 1981. Potential herbicides for brush control. J. Range Manage. 34:144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Hein, Hugo Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1983. Absorption and translocation of triclopyr in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 31:807–812.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1985. Herbicide mixtures for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 33:349–352.Google Scholar
5. Cotterill, E. G. 1978. Determination of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid residues in soil by gas chromatography of the 1-butyl ester. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 15:471–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Davis, F. S., Meyer, R. E., Baur, J. R., and Bovey, R. W. 1972. Herbicide concentrations in honey mesquite phloem. Weed Sci. 20:264–267.Google Scholar
7. Jacoby, P. W., Meadors, C. H., and Foster, M. A. 1981. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Weed Sci. 29:376–378.Google Scholar
8. Jacoby, P. W. and Meadors, C. H. 1983. Triclopyr for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 31:681–685.Google Scholar
9. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1986. Influence of environment and stage of growth on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) response to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:287–299.Google Scholar
10. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY. 633 pp.Google Scholar