Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:14:34.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Rayless Goldenrod (Isocoma wrightii) with Soil-Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Darrell N. Ueckert
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Steven G. Whisenant
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
George W. Sultemeier
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., Fort Stockton, TX 79735

Abstract

Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) applied at 0.6 to 1.2 kg/ha as 5 or 10% pellets during the summer or fall usually killed 90% or more of the rayless goldenrod [Isocoma wrightii (Gray) Rydb.] on sandy loam soils in western Texas, whereas the higher rates were necessary for 80% or greater control following winter applications. Acceptable control persisted for 4 yr. Applications of tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea}at 1.1 kg/ha as 20% pellets during summer controlled 85% of the rayless goldenrod, but summer applications of tebuthiuron at 0.6 kg/ha or winter applications at 0.6 or 1.1 kg/ha did not control the weed effectively. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) applied at 0.6 or 1.1 kg/ha as 5% granules did not control rayless goldenrod. Prescribed burning in late February reduced the density of rayless goldenrod 18 to 41%, but decreased control with soil-applied picloram or tebuthiuron. Reduction in rayless goldenrod densities of 75% or greater following applications of picloram or tebuthiuron pellets more than doubled the estimated carrying capacity of the arid rangeland.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic carbon. Pages 13671378 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. (Part II). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas Res. Found., Renner. 1881.Google Scholar
3. Couch, J. F. 1930. The toxic constituent of rayless goldenrod. J. Agric. Res. 40:649658.Google Scholar
4. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Pages 545567 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. (Part I). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
5. Gordon, R. A., Scifres, C. J., and Mutz, J. L. 1982. Integration of burning and picloram pellets for Macartney rose control. J. Range Manage. 35:427430.Google Scholar
6. James, L. F., Keeler, R. F., Johnson, A. E., Williams, M. C., Cronin, E. H., and Olsen, J. D. 1980. Plants poisonous to livestock in the western states. U.S. Dep. Agric. Info. Bull. No. 415. 90.Google Scholar
7. Marsh, C. D. 1926. Rayless goldenrod (Aplopappus heterophyllus) as a poisonous plant. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. No. 1391. 24.Google Scholar
8. Marsh, C. D. 1929. Trembles. U.S. Dep. Agric. Farmers Bull. 1593. 10.Google Scholar
9. Marsh, C. D. and Roe, G. C. 1921. The “alkali disease” of livestock in the Pecos Valley. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 180. 8.Google Scholar
10. Peech, M. 1965. Hydrogen ion activity. Pages 914926 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. (Part II). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
11. Rives, J. L. 1980. Soil survey of Pecos County, Texas. U.S. Dep. Agric., Soil Cons. Serv. Temple, Texas. 97.Google Scholar
12. Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush Management. Principles and Practices for Texas and the Southwest. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, Texas. 360.Google Scholar
13. Sperry, O. E. 1953. Rayless goldenrod — a poisonous range plant in Texas. J. Range Manage. 6:610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Sperry, O. E., Dollahite, J. W., Hoffman, G. O., and Camp, B. J. 1964. Texas plants poisonous to livestock. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1028. 57.Google Scholar