Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T07:43:55.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Common Cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) in Soybeans (Glycine max) with Sequential Applications of Mefluidide and Acifluorfen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Scott Glenn ,
Barbara J. Hook ,
Robert S. Peregoy  and
Thomas Wiepke
Scott Glenn
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Barbara J. Hook
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Robert S. Peregoy
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Thomas Wiepke
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Single and sequential applications of mefluidide {N-[2,4-dimethyl-5-[[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide} and acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} were evaluated in the field for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯ ABUTH) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr. ♯ XANPE) control in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams’]. Acifluorfen was applied at 0.4 or 0.6 kg ai/ha alone or 3, 5, or 7 days following application of 0.1 or 0.3 kg ai/ha mefluidide. Acifluorfen applied alone provided acceptable control of velvetleaf and common cocklebur in the two- and three-leaf stage of growth, but acifluorfen was not as effective when applied to weeds with five to eight true leaves. Sequential applications of mefluidide and acifluorfen often increased velvetleaf and common cocklebur control, compared to either herbicide applied alone.

Keywords

Herbicide combinationsgrowth stageABUTHXANPE
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 244 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baldwin, F. L. and Frans, R. E. 1972. Soybean and weed response to dinoseb and chloroxuron applied topically. Weed Sci. 20:511–514.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
4. Glenn, S., Rieck, C. E., Ely, D. G., and Bush, L. P. 1980. Quality of tall fescue forage affected by mefluidide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:391–393.Google Scholar
5. Hargroder, T. G., Calhoun, J. K., and Gates, D. W. 1982. Mefluidide and acifluorfen combinations for improved weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 35:36.Google Scholar
6. Hook, B. J. and Glenn, S. 1984. Mefluidide and acifluorfen interactions on ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum). Weed Sci. 32:198–201.Google Scholar
7. Hook, B. J. and Glenn, S. 1984. Penetration, translocation, and metabolism of acifluorfen following pretreatment with mefluidide. Weed Sci. 32:691–696.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, W. O., Kollman, G. T., Swithenbank, C., and Yih, R. Y. 1978. RH-6201 (Blazer): A new broad spectrum herbicide for postemergence use in soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:285–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for applications. Weed Sci. 30:520–526.Google Scholar
10. Mathias, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1980. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 28:409–415.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1979. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with mefluidide applied postemergence. Weed Sci. 27:42–47.Google Scholar
12. Rao, S. R. and Harger, T. R. 1981. Mefluidide-bentazon interactions on soybean (Glycine max) and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 29:208–212.Google Scholar
13. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
14. Watschke, T. L. 1976. Growth regulation of Kentucky bluegrass with several growth retardants. Agron. J. 68:787–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar