Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:08:12.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-resistance to photosystem II inhibitors observed in target site–resistant but not in non–target site resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Martin Laforest
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada
Marie-Josée Simard
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada
Sydney Meloche
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow Research and Development Centre, Harrow, ON, Canada
Lydia Maheux
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada
François Tardif
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
Eric Page*
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow Research and Development Centre, Harrow, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Eric Page, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow Research and Development Centre, 2585 County Road 20, Harrow, ON N0R 1G0, Canada. Email: Eric.Page@agr.gc.ca

Abstract

The full spectrum of herbicide resistance in a weed can vary according to the mechanistic basis and cannot be implied from the selective pressure. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is an important weed species of horticultural crops that has developed resistance to linuron based on either target site– or non–target site resistance mechanisms. The objective of the study is to characterize the cross-resistance to metribuzin of linuron-selected biotypes of A. artemisiifolia with target site– and non–target site resistance and determine its genetic basis. Crosses were made between two types of linuron-resistant biotype and a linuron-susceptible biotype, and the progeny were further backcrossed with susceptible plants to the third backcross (BC3) generation to determine their responses to both herbicides compared with parental lines. The target site–based linuron-resistant biotype was cross-resistant to metribuzin, and resistance to both herbicides was maintained at the same level in the BC3 line. In contrast, the linuron-selected biotype with a non–target site resistance mechanism was not cross-resistant to metribuzin. In addition, the BC3 lines deriving from the non–target site resistant parents had very low-level resistance. While the target site–resistance trait is maintained through multiple crosses, non–target site based resistance would be lost over time when selection is absent or insufficient to retain all genes involved in resistance as a complex trait. This would imply A. artemisiifolia biotypes with different mechanisms would need to be managed differently over time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Christopher Preston, University of Adelaide

References

Anonymous (2016) TriCor® 75 DF Herbicide product label. King of Prussia, PA: United Phosphorus Inc. 43 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2019) Lorox® product label. Phoenix, AZ: Tessenderlo Kerley Inc. 19 pGoogle Scholar
Basset, IJ, Crompton, CW (1975) The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia and A. psilostachya . Can J Plant Sci 55:463476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglino, B, Grinzato, A, Pagliano, C (2021) Binding properties of photosynthetic herbicides with the QB site of the D1 protein in plant photosystem II: a combined functional and molecular docking study. Plants 10:1501 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckie, HJ, Tardif, FJ (2012) Herbicide cross resistance in weeds. Crop Prot 35:1528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, CJ (2006) L’herbe à poux, une espèce nuisible. https://www.agrireseau.net/phytoprotection/Documents/Pr%C3%A9sentation%20MontebelloREV.PDF. Accessed: March 8, 2021Google Scholar
Brown, RA, Farmer, D (1991) Track-sprayer and glasshouse techniques for terrestrial plant bioassays with pesticides. Pages 197–208 in Gorsuch JW, Lower WR, Lewis MA, Sandhu S, Wang WW, eds. Plants for Toxicity Assessment. Second Volume. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM InternationalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caverzan, A, Piasecki, C, Chavarria, G, Stewart, CN Jr, Vargas, L (2019) Defenses against ROS in crops and weeds: the effects of interference and herbicides. Int J Mol Sci 20:1086 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G (2014) A Survey and Characterization of Linuron-Resistant Amaranthus spp. in Southern Ontario Carrot Production. Master’s thesis. Guelph, Ontario: University of Guelph. 89 pGoogle Scholar
Delabays, N, Bohren, C, Mermillod, G (2005) L’ambroisie à feuilles d’armoise (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) en Suisse: aspects malherbologiques. Revue Suisse Agric 37:1724 Google Scholar
Deng, W, Yang, M, Li, Y, Xia, Z, Chen, Y, Yuan, S, Yang, Q (2021) Enhanced metabolism confers a high level of cyhalofop-butyl resistance in a Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees) population. Pest Manag Sci 77:25762583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimaano, NG, Yamaguchi, T, Fukunishi, K, Tominaga, T, Iwakami, S (2020) Functional characterization of cytochrome P450 CYP81A subfamily to disclose the pattern of cross-resistance in Echinochloa phyllopogon . Plant Mol Biol 102:403416 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumont, M, Letarte, J, Tardif, FJ (2016) Identification of a psbA mutation (Valine219 to Isoleucine) in Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) conferring resistance to linuron. Weed Sci 64:611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, G (1989) A stereochemical model for the active site of photosystem II herbicides. Photochem Photobiol 49:331336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronwald, JW (1994) Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. Pages 27–60 in Powles SB, Holtum JAM, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis PublishersGoogle Scholar
[HRAC] Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (2020) HRAC Mode of Action Classification 2020. https://hracglobal.com/files/HRAC_Revised_MOA_Classification_Herbicides_Poster.pdf. Accessed: March 18, 2021Google Scholar
Huppatz, JL (1996) Quantifying the Inhibitor-Target Site Interactions of Photosystem II Herbicides. Weed Sci 44:743748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Streibig, JC, Ritz, C (2007) Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol 21:840848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, C (2019) Petite herbe à poux. Québec: Les Publications du Québec. 415 p Google Scholar
Ma, H, Lu, H, Han, H, Yu, Q, Powles, S (2020) Metribuzin resistance via enhanced metabolism in a multiple herbicide resistant Lolium rigidum population. Pest Manag Sci 76:37853791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masabni, JG, Zandstra, BH (1999) A serine-to-threonine mutation in linuron-resistant Portulaca oleracea . Weed Sci 47:393400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengistu, LW, Christoffers, MJ, Lym, RG (2005) A psbA mutation in Kochia scoparia (L) Schrad from railroad rights-of-way with resistance to diuron, tebuthiuron and metribuzin. Pest Manag Sci 61:10351042 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mengistu, LW, Mueller-Warrant, GW, Liston, A, Barker, RE (2000) psbA Mutation (valine219 to isoleucine) in Poa annua resistant to metribuzin and diuron. Pest Manag Sci 56:209217 3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (2021a) Publication 75A: Guide to Weed Control, Field Crops. Toronto: Government of Ontario. 260 pGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (2021b) Publication 75B: Guide to Weed Control, Hort Crops. Toronto: Government of Ontario. 260 pGoogle Scholar
Molina-Montenegro, MA, Peñuelas, J, Munné-Bosch, S, Sardans, J (2011) Higher plasticity in ecophysiological traits enhances the performance and invasion success of Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) in alpine environments. Biol Invasions 14:2133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, ER, Liu, W, Cerrudo, D, Lee, EA, Swanton, CJ (2011) Shade avoidance influences stress tolerance in maize. Weed Sci 59:326334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C (2004) Herbicide resistance in weeds endowed by enhanced detoxification: complications for management. Weed Sci 52:448453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Tardif, FJ, Christopher, JT, Powles, SB (1996) Multiple resistance to dissimilar herbicide chemistries in a biotype of Lolium rigidum due to enhanced activity of several herbicide degrading enzymes. Pestic Biochem Physiol 54:123134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Baty, F, Streibig, JC, Gerhard, D (2015) Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10:e0146021 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint-Louis, S, DiTommaso, A, Watson, AK (2005) A common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) biotype in southwestern Québec resistant to linuron. Weed Technol 19:737743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, RD, Gaines, TA (2014) Glyphosate resistance: state of knowledge. Pest Manag Sci 70:13671377 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 513 p Google Scholar
Shipman, LL (1981) Theoretical study of the binding site and mode of action for photosystem II herbicides. J Theoret Biol 90:123148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, MJ, Benoit, DL (2010) Distribution and abundance of an allergenic weed, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), in rural settings of southern Quebec, Canada. Can J Plant Sci 90:549557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, MJ, Laforest, M, Soufiane, B, Benoit, DL, Tardif, FJ (2017) Linuron resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) populations in Quebec carrot fields: presence and distribution of target and non-target site resistant biotypes. Can J Plant Sci 98:345352 Google Scholar
Tyr, S, Veres, T, Lacko-Bartosova, M (2009) Occurence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in field crops in the slovak republic. Herbologia 10:19 Google Scholar
Yu, Q, Powles, S (2014) Metabolism-based herbicide resistance and cross-resistance in crop weeds: a threat to herbicide sustainability and global crop production. Plant Physiol 166:11061118 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, JS, Tranel, PJ, Stewart, CN Jr (2007) Non-target-site herbicide resistance: a family business. Trends Plant Sci 12:613 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zharmukhamedov, SK, Allakhverdiev, SI (2021) Chemical inhibitors of photosystem II. Russ J Plant Physiol 68:212227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar