Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:25:34.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing an Integrated Weed Management System for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Using Lentil (Lens culinaris) as a Model Crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2017

Colleen Redlick
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Lena D. Syrovy
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Hema S. N. Duddu
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Dilshan Benaragama
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Eric N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Weed Biologist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Scott Research Farm, P.O. Box 10, Scott, SK S0K 4A0, Canada
Christian J. Willenborg
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
Steven J. Shirtliffe*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: steve.shirtliffe@usask.ca

Abstract

The escalating evolution of weed species resistant to acetolactase synthase (ALS)-inhibitor herbicides makes alternative weed control strategies necessary for field crops that are dependent on this herbicide group. A fully integrated strategy that combined increased crop seeding rates (2X or 4X recommended), mechanical weed control with a minimum-tillage rotary hoe, and reduced-rate non–ALS inhibitor herbicides was compared with herbicides, rotary hoe, and seeding rates alone as a method of controlling ALS inhibitor–tolerant Indian mustard as a model weed. The full-rate herbicide treatment had the lowest weed biomass (98% reduction) and the highest yield of all treatments in 3 of 4 site-years, regardless of seeding rate. The fully integrated treatment at the 4X seeding rate had weed suppression rates equal to the full herbicide treatment at the recommended seeding rate. The fully integrated and reduced-rate herbicide treatments at the 4X seeding rate reduced weed biomass by 89% and 83%, respectively, compared with the control at the recommended seeding rate. The rotary hoe treatment alone resulted in poor weed control (≤38%), even at the highest seeding rate. Fully integrated and reduced-rate herbicide treatments at 2X and 4X seeding rates had yields equal to those of the full herbicide treatment at the recommended seeding rate. Partially or fully integrated weed control strategies that combine increased crop seeding rates and reduced-rate non–ALS inhibitor herbicides, with or without the use of a rotary hoe, can control weeds resistant to ALS-inhibitor herbicides, while maintaining crop yields similar to those achieved with full-rate herbicides. However, combining increased seeding rate, reduced-rate herbicides, and mechanical rotary hoe treatment into a fully integrated strategy maximized weed control, while reducing reliance on and selection pressure against any single weed control tactic.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

BASF Canada Inc., 1–411 Downey Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4L8, Canada

b

Department of Plant Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, 50300, Mihintale, Sri Lanka

c

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8 Canada

Associate Editor for this paper: Timothy L. Grey, University of Georgia.

References

Literature Cited

Baird, J, Shirtliffe, S, Walley, F (2009) Optimal seeding rate for organic production of lentil in the northern Great Plains. Can J Plant Sci 89:455464 Google Scholar
Ball, D, Ogg, A, Chevalier, P (1997) The influence of seeding rate on weed control in small-red lentil (Lens culinaris). Weed Sci 45:296300 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Harker, KN, Hall, LM, Warwick, SI, Légère, A, Sikkema, PH, Clayton, GW, Thomas, AG, Leeson, JY, Séguin-Swartz, G, Simard, M-J (2006) A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Can J Plant Sci 86:12431264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H, Kirkland, K (2003) Implication of reduced herbicide rates on resistance enrichment in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Technol 17:138148 Google Scholar
Beckie, H, Leeson, JY, Thomas, A, Hall, LM, Brenzil, CA, Andrews, T, Brown, K, Van Acker, R (2007). Prairie Weed Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Wild Oat from 2001–2003. Saskatoon, SK 49 pGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H, Lozinski, C, Shirriff, S, Brenzil, C (2013) Herbicide-resistant weeds in the Canadian prairies: 2007–2011. Weed Technol 27:171183 Google Scholar
Benaragama, D, Shirtliffe, S (2013) Integrating cultural and mechanical methods for additive weed control in organic systems. Agron J 105:17281734 Google Scholar
Brand, J, Yaduraju, NT, Shivakumar, BG, McMurray, L (2007) Weed Management. Pages 159172 in Yadav SS, McNeil DL & Stevenson PC, eds. Lentil—An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Google Scholar
Chant, SR (2004). Imidazolinone Tolerance in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). M.Sc thesis. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan. 95 pGoogle Scholar
Christoffers, M, Nandula, V, Howatt, K, Wehking, T (2010) Target-site resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Weed Sci 54:191197 Google Scholar
Friesen, GH, Wall, DA (1986) Tolerance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 66:131139 Google Scholar
Gannon, TW, Hixson, AC, Keller, KE, Weber, JB, Knezevic, SZ, Yelverton, FH (2014) Soil properties influence saflufenacil phytotoxicity. Weed Sci 62:657663 Google Scholar
Ghosheh, HZ, El-Shatnawi, MK (2003) Broadleaf weed control in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), faba beans (Vicia faba) and lentils (Lens culinaris). Acta Agron Hungarica 51:427444 Google Scholar
Harker, KN, O’Donovan, JT, Irvine, RB, Turkington, TK, Clayton, GW (2009) Integrating cropping systems with cultural techniques augments wild oat (Avena fatua) management in barley. Weed Sci 57:326337 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: December 12, 2016Google Scholar
Johnson, EN (2011) Post-emergence rotary hoeing for weed control in pulse crops. Can J Plant Sci 91:385 Google Scholar
Madden, L, Hughes, G, van den Bosch, F (2007) The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. Pp 111 Google Scholar
Mohler, CL (2004) Mechanical management of weeds. Pages 139209 in Liebman M, Mohler CL & Staver CP Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
O’Donovan, J, Newman, J (2004) Crop seeding rate influences the performance of variable herbicide rates in a canola–barley–canola rotation. Weed Technol 18:733741 Google Scholar
Owen, MDK, Beckie, HJ, Leeson, JY, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE (2015) Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and Canada. Pest Manag Sci 71:357376 Google Scholar
Saari, LL, Cotterman, JC, Thill, DC (1994) Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83139 in Powles S & Holtum JA, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. (2014) 2014 Guide to Crop Protection. Regina, SK, Canada 546 pGoogle Scholar
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers. (2012) Lentil Production Manual. Saskatoon, SK, Canada 60 pGoogle Scholar
Shirtliffe, SJ, Johnson, EN (2012) Progress towards no-till organic weed control in western Canada. Renew Agric Food Syst 27:6067 Google Scholar
Slinkard, A, Vandenberg, A, Holm, F (2007) Lentil plants having increased resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. US Patent 7,232,942 B2Google Scholar
Spies, JM, Warkentin, T, Shirtliffe, SJ (2010) Basal branching in field pea cultivars and yield-density relationships. Can J Plant Sci 90:679690 Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1991) Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol 5:657663 Google Scholar
Syrovy, LD, Banniza, S, Shirtliffe, SJ (2014) Yield and agronomic advantages of pea leaf type mixtures under organic management. Agron J 107:113120 Google Scholar
Taylor, EC, Renner, KA, Sprague, CL (2012) Organic weed management in field crops with a propane flamer and rotary hoe. Weed Technol 26:793799 Google Scholar
Veldhuis, LJ, Hall, LM, O’Donovan, JT, Dyer, W, Hall, JC (2000) Metabolism-based resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to ethametsulfuron-methyl. J Agric Food Chem 48:29862990 Google Scholar
Warwick, S, Sauder, C, Beckie, H (2005) Resistance in Canadian biotypes of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 53:631639 Google Scholar