Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:35:01.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Axillary Buds from Johnsongrass Rhizomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. A. Beasley*
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Laboratories, Stanford Research Institute, Southern California Laboratories, 820 Mission Street, South Pasadena, California

Abstract

Apical dominance, as maintained by above-ground foliage or individual rhizome apexes, is very marked in johnsongrass. (Sorghum halepense [L.] Pers.). Axillary bud development in single-node segments excised from individual rhizome pieces was least at the proximal end with increasing activity toward the distal end (apex end). Within serially excised, multi-node sections, axillary bud development was least at the proximal end and greatest at the distal end, and there was an overall increase in bud activity from proximal to distal ends of the rhizome pieces. This was true irrespective of whether the multi-node sections were cultured vertically (with buds oriented above the nodes) or were inverted (with buds oriented below the nodes). Lateral rhizomes exerted a dominating influence on the development of axillary buds from their parent rhizomes, as did the apical meristems of the parent rhizomes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, L. E., Appleby, A. P., and Weseloh, J. W. 1960. Characteristics of johnsongrass rhizomes. Weeds 8:402406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Audus, L. J. 1959. Correlations. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) 57:177187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Audus, L. J. 1959. Plant growth substances. Plant Sciences Monographs. Leonard Hill (Books) Limited, London. 553 p.Google Scholar
4. Beasley, C. A. and Fox, W. P. 1970. A mist chamber for the culture of plants or explant segments. Weed Sci. 18:223225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Galston, A. W. and Purves, W. K. 1960. The mechanism of action of auxin. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 11:239276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gregory, F. G. and Veale, J. A. 1957. A reassessment of the problem of apical dominance. Biological action of growth substances. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 11:120.Google Scholar
7. Husain, S. M. and Linck, A. J. 1966. Relationship of apical dominance to the nutrient accumulation pattern in Pisum sativum L. var. Alaska. Physiol. Plant. 19:9921010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Husain, S. M. and Linck, A. J. 1967. The effect of chilling on the physiological and simulated apex of 2- and 3-leaf plants of Pisum sativum L. var. Alaska on lateral shoot growth. C-14 IAA movement and P-32 accumulation. Physiol. Plant. 20:4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kefford, N. P. and Goldacre, P. L. 1961. The changing concept of auxin. Amer. J. Bot. 48:643650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Leopold, A. Carl. 1964. Plant Growth and Development. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 466 p.Google Scholar
11. McIntyre, G. I. 1964. Mechanism of apical dominance in plants. Nature 203:11901191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. McIntyre, G. I. 1965. Some effects of the nitrogen supply on the growth and development of Agropyron repens L. (Beauv.). Weed Res. 5:112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McIntyre, G. I. 1968. Nutritional control of the correlative inhibition between lateral shoots in the flax seedling (Linum usitatissimum). Can. J. Bot. 46:147155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McIntyre, G. I. 1969. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Evidence of competition for carbohydrates as a factor in the mechanism of inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 47:11891197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Morphology and development of johnsongrass plants from seeds and rhizomes. Weeds 9:558562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Carbohydrate metabolism of johnsongrass as influenced by seasonal growth and herbicide treatments. Weeds 9:563568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Oyer, E. B., Gries, G. A., and Rogers, B. J. 1959. The seasonal development of johnsongrass plants. Weeds 7:1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Régulateurs Naturels de la Croissance Végetale. 1964. Ce Colloque est le Ve Colloque International sur les Substances de Croissance végétales. J. P. Nitsch, Directeur-adjoint du Phytotron. Gif s/Yvette, 1963. 748 p.Google Scholar
19. Sachs, T. and Thimann, K. V. 1967. The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance. Amer. J. Bot. 54:136144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Schwanitz, F. 1935. Beiträge zur analyse der pflanzlichen polarität. Botanisches Zentralblatt-Beihefte 54A:520530.Google Scholar
21. Smith, H. and Kefford, N. P. 1964. The chemical regulation of the dormancy phases of bud development. Amer. J. Bot. 51:10021012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Thimann, K. V. 1939. Auxins and the inhibition of plant growth. Biol. Rev. 14:314337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Thimann, K. V. 1954. Correlations of growth by humoral influences. Rapports et communications 8e Congr. Paris. Internal. Bot. Sect. 11:114128.Google Scholar
24. Thimann, K. V. 1963. Plant growth substances, past, present, and future. In Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology. Ann Rev., Inc., Palo Alto, California. 14:118.Google Scholar
25. Wickson, Margaret and Thimann, K. V. 1958. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiol. Plant. 11:6274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wickson, Margaret and Thimann, K. V. 1960. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. II. The transport of IAA in pea stems in relation to apical dominance. Physiol. Plant. 13:539554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar