Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:38:06.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Atrazine Tolerance Within Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. M. Werner  and
A. R. Putnam
G. M. Werner
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Pestic. Res. Center, Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
A. R. Putnam
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Pestic. Res. Center, Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) accession PI 390244 tolerated up to 0.56 kg/ha atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] whereas most cultivars and accessions were killed by 0.14 kg/ha. The possible mechanisms for tolerance were investigated by comparing growth rates, effects on photosystem II in isolated chloroplasts, and differences in uptake and translocation of 14C-atrazine between tolerant PI 390244 and the susceptible cultivar Marketmore 70. PI 390244 had significantly more leaf area than Marketmore 70, but less root biomass. Isolated chloroplast preparations from both cultivars were equally susceptible to the herbicide. Although PI 390244 absorbed more total 14C-atrazine, it translocated less radioactivity from the roots. While the concentration of 14C found in the PI 390244 roots was 10 to 30% greater than in Marketmore 70, the amount of radioactivity in the cotyledons, and first and second true leaves of Marketmore 70 were 53, 34, and 55% higher, respectively, after 48 h.

Keywords

Resistancegrowth analysisuptaketranslocationphotosynthetic inhibitorss-triazines
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 142 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Albrecht, H. R. 1947. Strain differences in tolerance to 2,4-D in creeping bent grasses. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 39:163–165.Google Scholar
2. Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts, Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.Google Scholar
3. Bandeen, J. D. and McLaren, R. D. 1976. Resistance of Chenopodium album L. to triazines. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:411–412.Google Scholar
4. Bucholtz, K. P. 1958. Variations in the sensitivity of clones of quackgrass to dalapon. Proc. 15th North Cent. Weed Control Conf. pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
5. Devine, T. E., Seaney, R. E., Linscott, D. L., Hagin, R. D., and Brace, N. 1975. Results of breeding for tolerance to 2,4-D in birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci. 15:721–724.Google Scholar
6. Evans, B.C. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Univ. of California Press, Berkley, Los Angeles. 734 pp.Google Scholar
7. Hamilton, K. C. and Tucker, H. 1964. Response of selected and random plantings of johnsongrass to dalapon. Weeds 12:220–222.Google Scholar
8. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. 3rd Brit. Weed Control Conf. pp. 179–188.Google Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1938. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Univ. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
10. Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18:253–255.Google Scholar
11. Izawa, S. and Good, N. E. 1965. The number of sites sensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea and 2-chloro-4-(2-propylamino)-6-ethylamino-s-triazine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 102:20–38.Google Scholar
12. Jensen, K. I. N., Bandeen, J. D., and Souza Machado, V. 1977. Studies on the differential tolerance of two lambsquarters selections to triazine herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:1169–1177.Google Scholar
13. Moreland, D. E. and Hill, K. L. 1962. Interference of herbicides with the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts. Weeds 10:229–236.Google Scholar
14. Peabody, D. 1973. Aatrex tolerant pigweed found in Washington. Weeds Today 4:17.Google Scholar
15. Radosevich, S. R. and Appleby, A. P. 1973. Studies on the mechanism of resistance to simazine in common groundsel. Weed Sci. 21:497–500.Google Scholar
16. Radosevich, S. R. and Devilliers, O. T. 1976. Studies on the mechanism of s-triazine resistance in common groundsel. Weed Sci. 24:229–232.Google Scholar
17. Radosevich, S. R. 1977. Mechanism of atrazine resistance in lambsquarters and pigweed. Weed Sci. 25:316–318.Google Scholar
18. Roche, B. F. and Muzik, T. J. 1964. Ecological and physiological study of Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. and response of its biotypes to sodium 2,2-dichloropropionate (dalapon.). Agron. J. 56:155–160.Google Scholar
19. Ryan, G. I. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–616.Google Scholar
20. Santlemann, P. W. and Meade, J. A. 1961. Variation in morphological characteristics and dalapon susceptibility within the species Setaria lutescens and S. faberii . Weeds 9:406–410.Google Scholar
21. Schooler, A. B., Bell, A. R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1972. Inheritance of Siduron tolerance in foxtail barley. Weed Sci. 20:167–169.Google Scholar
22. Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility differences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12:19–22.Google Scholar
23. Souza Machado, V., Bandeen, J. D., Taylor, W. D., and Lavigne, P. 1977. Atrazine resistant biotypes of common ragweed and bird's rape. Can. Weed Comm. East. Sect. Rep. p. 306.Google Scholar
24. Souza Machado, V., Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Jensen, K. I. N. 1977. Differential atrazine interference with the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts from Chenopodium album L. biotypes. Weed Res. 17:407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Souza Machado, V., Bandeen, J. D., and Bhowmik, P. C. 1978. Triazine tolerance of bird's rape biotypes. Can. Weed Comm. East. Sect. Rep. p. 338.Google Scholar
26. Thompson, L. Jr., Schumacker, R. W., and Rieck, C. J. 1974. An atrazine resistant strain of redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. #196:85.Google Scholar
27. Werner, G. M. and Putnam, A. R. 1977. Triazine tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32. p. 26.Google Scholar
28. West, L. D., Muzik, T. J., and Witters, R. I. 1976. Differential gas exchange responses of two biotypes of redroot pigweed to atrazine. Weed Sci. 24:68–72.Google Scholar
29. Whitehead, C. W. and Switzer, C. M. 1963. The differential response of strains of wild carrot to 2,4-D and related herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43:255–262.Google Scholar
30. Whiteworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15:275–280.Google Scholar