Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:51:51.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Metabolism of Metribuzin by Two Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. L. Mangeot ,
F. E. Slife  and
C. E. Rieck
B. L. Mangeot
Affiliation:
Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
F. E. Slife
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
C. E. Rieck
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metribuzin-3-14C [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] was absorbed, translocated, and metabolized by both metribuzin-tolerant ‘Essex’ and metribuzin-sensitive ‘Coker 102’ soybean cultivars [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. After 48 h Coker 102 accumulated 40% greater metribuzin equivalents in the shoots than Essex, but Essex shoots contained only 29% as much unaltered metribuzin as Coker 102, 1.08 and 3.68 μg per g dry weight, respectively. Essex is resistant to metribuzin primarily owing to a capacity to rapidly detoxify metribuzin to DA [6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one], to at least seven unidentified metabolites which remained in the aqueous fraction, and to an insoluble fraction. The unidentified metabolites in the aqueous fraction constituted the major detoxified breakdown products in both cultivars.

Keywords

Absorptiontranslocation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 267 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Coble, H. D. and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
2. Hardcastle, W. S. 1974. Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybeans. Weed Res. 14:181–184.Google Scholar
3. Hargroder, T. G. and Rogers, R. L. 1974. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in soybeans and hemp sesbania. Weed Sci. 22:238–245.Google Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. Smith, A. E. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 32:253–257.Google Scholar