Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:52:02.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential responses to red clover residue and ammonium nitrate by common bean and wild mustard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric R. Gallandt
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 5722 Deering Hall, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5722

Abstract

Legume green manures have been used for millennia as sources of N for succeeding crops, but they are also sources of phytotoxic compounds that may selectively influence the performance of crop and weed species. To determine whether substitution of legume green manure for synthetic N fertilizer could enhance crop yield while suppressing weed growth, we conducted a field experiment in which common bean and wild mustard were sown in monocultures and mixtures. Three soil management treatments were employed: red clover residue, ammonium nitrate fertilizer (84 kg N ha−1), and a control that received neither red clover nor ammonium nitrate. In the absence of wild mustard, bean seed yield was equivalent in the red clover and ammonium nitrate treatments, where yields were 11 to 26% greater, respectively, than in the control. When bean grew in competition with wild mustard, its seed yield was as high (1995 and 1996) or higher (1994) with red clover residue than with ammonium nitrate. Averaged over bean competition treatments, wild mustard biomass production was 37% lower with red clover residue than with ammonium nitrate in 1994, 53% lower in 1995, and equivalent in these two treatments in 1996. Bean seed yield and wild mustard biomass production were strongly correlated with whole-plant N content and more weakly correlated with leaf area duration. Of the variation observed in wild mustard seed production, 89 to 93% was predicted by the variation in wild mustard biomass. The results of this study indicate that substitution of red clover green manure for ammonium nitrate fertilizer can be compatible with bean production goals and can contribute to the management of wild mustard.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bliss, F. A. 1993. Breeding common bean for improved biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 152:7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Baumann, P. A. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75147 In Bridges, D. C., ed. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States: 1992. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Chang, C., Suzuki, A., Kumai, S., and Tamura, S. 1969. Chemical studies on “clover sickness.” Part II. Biological functions of isoflavonoids and their related compounds. Agric. Biol. Chem. 33:398408.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. R. 1985. Fertilizer needs of dry beans. Mich. Dry Bean Dig. 9 (2): 1416.Google Scholar
Conklin, A. E., Erich, M. S., Liebman, M., Lambert, D., Gallandt, E., and Halteman, W. A. 2002. Effects of red clover (Trifolium pratense) green manure and compost soil amendments on the growth and health of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) seedlings. Plant Soil. 238:245256.Google Scholar
Dyck, E. and Liebman, M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: the effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil 167:227237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, E., Liebman, M., and Erich, M. S. 1995. Crop-weed interference as influenced by a leguminous or synthetic fertilizer nitrogen source: 1. Doublecropping experiments with crimson clover, sweet corn, and lambsquarters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 56:93108.Google Scholar
Evans, G. C. 1972. The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 734 p.Google Scholar
Fox, R. H. and Piekielek, W. P. 1988. Fertilizer N equivalence of alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, and red clover for succeeding corn crops. J. Prod. Agric. 1:313317.Google Scholar
Heichel, G. H., Vance, C. P., Barnes, D. K., and Henjun, K. I. 1985. Dinitrogen fixation, and N and dry matter distribution during 4 year stands of birdsfoot trefoil and red clover. Crop Sci. 25:101105.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. 1990. Basic Growth Analysis. London: Unwin Hyman. 112 p.Google Scholar
Inderjit, . 1996. Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 62:186202.Google Scholar
Isoi, T. and Yoshida, S. 1991. Low nitrogen fixation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 37:559563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. D. and Mengel, D. B. 1986. Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilizers surface applied in no-till corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:10601063.Google Scholar
Laing, D. R., Jones, P. G., and Davis, J.H.C. 1984. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pages 305351 In Goldworthy, P. R. and Fisher, N. M., eds. The Physiology of Tropical Crops. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Lamey, H. A., Zollinger, R. K., McBride, D. K., Venette, R. C., and Venette, J. R. 1991. Production problems and practices of Northarvest dry bean growers in 1989. Farm Res, N. D. 49 (2): 1724.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. 1989. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation and crop genotype on canopy relations and yields of an intercrop/weed mixture. Field Crops Res. 22:83100.Google Scholar
Liebman, M., Corson, S., Rowe, R. J., and Halteman, W. A. 1995. Dry bean responses to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems. Agron. J. 87:538546.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Davis, A. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop, and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res. 40:2747.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. R. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interactions. Pages 287339 In Jackson, L. E., ed. Ecology in Agriculture. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Robichaux, R. H. 1990. Competition by barley and pea against mustard: effects on resource acquisition, photosynthesis and yield. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 31:155172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraghan, J. T., Lamb, J. A., and Albus, W. 1991. Nitrogen fertilizer requirements of navy beans in the northern Great Plains. J. Prod. Agric. 4:204208.Google Scholar
Ohno, T., Doolan, K., Zibilske, L. M., Liebman, M., Gallandt, E. R., and Berube, C. 2000. Phytotoxic effects of red clover amended soils on wild mustard seedling growth. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 78:187192.Google Scholar
Robertson, L. S., Cook, R. L., and Davis, J. F. 1978. The Ferden Farm Report: IV. Soil Management for Navy Beans. Research Report 350. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Siquiera, J. O., Nair, M. G., Hammerschmidt, M. R., and Safir, G. R. 1991. Significance of phenolic compounds in plant-soil-microbial systems. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 10:63121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stute, J. K. and Posner, J. L. 1995. Legume cover crops as a nitrogen source for corn in an oat-corn rotation. J. Prod. Agric. 8:385390.Google Scholar
Tamura, S., Chang, C., Suzuki, A., and Kumai, S. 1969. Chemical studies on “clover sickness.” Part I. Isolation and structural elucidation of two new isoflavonoids in red clover. Agric. Biol. Chem. 33:391397.Google Scholar
Tanaka, A. and Fujita, K. 1979. Growth, photosynthesis and yield components in relation to grain yield of field bean. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 59:146238.Google Scholar
Troeh, F. R. and Thompson, L. M. 1993. Soils and Soil Fertility. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 462 p.Google Scholar
Westermann, D. T., Kleinkopf, G. E., Porter, L. K., and Legett, G. E. 1981. Nitrogen sources for bean seed production. Agron. J. 73:660664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L., Hill, M. A., and Vang, E. 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics. Version 5.2.1. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT. 724 p.Google Scholar