Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:59:33.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Fluometuron and Trifluralin Residues After Long-term Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Billy R. Corbin Jr. ,
Marilyn McClelland ,
Robert E. Frans ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Diana Horton
Billy R. Corbin Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Marilyn McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Diana Horton
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing long-term cotton experiments established in 1976 with minimum and intensive herbicide programs were subdivided in 1985 and 1986 to determine the longevity of fluometuron and trifluralin soil residues after discontinuing herbicide application. In monoculture cotton, seed cotton yield increased when herbicide use was discontinued in 1985 and 1986 after 9 and 10 yr of continuous use, respectively, on a Sharkey silty clay and a Dundee silt loam soil. Yield increases coincided with reductions of fluometuron and trifluralin soil residues. Fluometuron dissipated from the Dundee silt loam soil by 10 mo after the last application but was present in the Sharkey silty clay soil at 0.20 ppmw after 28 mo. Trifluralin did not totally dissipate from either soil, and low levels were present in the Dundee (0.05 ppmw) and Sharkey (0.13 ppmw) soils 30 mo after the last application. Visual injury to fall-seeded wheat and vetch decreased as herbicide residues dissipated. Fall tillage had no significant effect on the rate of fluometuron or trifluralin dissipation from either soil but reduced seed cotton yields.

Keywords

Fluometuron, N,N-dimethyl-N′-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]ureatrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminecotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DPL-41’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Caldwell’vetch, Vicia villosa RothPersistenceherbicide residuecover cropscarryovertillageGossypium hirsutumTriticum aestivumVicia villosa.
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 438 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels of herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312–317.Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Childers, V. O. 1967. Trifluralin behavior in soil. I. Toxicity and persistence as related to organic matter. Agron. J. 59:159–160.Google Scholar
3. Bouchard, D. C., Lavy, T. L., and Marx, D. B. 1982. Fate of metribuzin, metolachlor, and fluometuron in soil. Weed Sci. 30:629–632.Google Scholar
4. Brewer, F., Lavy, T. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1982. Effect of three dinitroaniline herbicides on rice (Oryza sativa) growth. Weed Sci. 30:153–158.Google Scholar
5. Bridge, R. R. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1983. Comparative performance of obsolete and current cotton cultivars. Crop Sci. 23:949–952.Google Scholar
6. Darding, R. L. and Freeman, J. F. 1968. Residual phytotoxicity of fluometuron in soils. Weed Sci. 16:226–229.Google Scholar
7. Green, T. R. 1978. The effects of herbicides used in monocultural production of cotton and soybeans on four fall-seeded crops. M.S. Thesis. Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. 36 pp.Google Scholar
8. Hamilton, K. C. and Arle, H. F. 1972. Persistence of herbicides in fallow desert croplands. Weed Sci. 20:573–576.Google Scholar
9. Hayes, R. M., Hoskinson, P. E., Overton, J. R., and Jeffery, L. S. 1981. Effect of consecutive annual application of fluometuron on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 29:120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jackson, A. W., Jeffery, L. S., and McCutchen, T. C. 1978. Tolerance of soybeans (Glycine max) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to fluometuron residue. Weed Sci. 26:454–458.Google Scholar
11. Mattice, J. D. and Lavy, T. L. 1982. Rapid high performance liquid chromatographic method for determining trace levels of fluometuron in soil. J. Chromatogr. 250:109–112.Google Scholar
12. Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1982. The cotton yield problem: Changes in cotton yields since 1950. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.-Mech. Conf. Pages 35–38.Google Scholar
13. Miller, J. H., Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Soil persistence of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 23:211–214.Google Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R. and Frans, R. E. 1968. Inhibition of cotton and soybean roots from incorporated trifluralin and persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 16:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Fluometuron in soil solution as an indicator of its efficacy in three soils. Weed Sci. 30:688–691.Google Scholar
16. Probst, G. W., Golab, T., Herberg, R. J., Holzer, F. J., Parka, S. J., van der Schans, C., and Tepe, J. B. 1967. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:592–599.Google Scholar
17. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Effect of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) carryover on subsequent crops. Weed Sci. 34:756–760.Google Scholar
18. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1985. Residual fluometuron levels in three Arkansas soils under continuous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production. Weed Sci. 34:122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Savage, K. E. and Wauchope, R. D. 1974. Fluometuron adsorption-desorption in soil. Weed Sci. 22:106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.Google Scholar
21. Scott, H. D., Keisling, T. C., Waddle, B. A., Williams, R. W., and Frans, R. E. 1990. Effects of winter cover crops on yield of cotton and soil properties. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 924. 21 pages.Google Scholar
22. Scott, H. D., Rutledge, E. M., and Miley, W. N. 1983. Effect of tillage on soil physical properties. Arkansas Farm Res. 32:5.Google Scholar
23. Sharp, T., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1982. Persistence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicides and injury to replacement soybeans (Glycine max) after stand failure. Weed Sci. 30:109–115.Google Scholar
24. Shea, P. J. 1985. Detoxification of herbicide residues in soil. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl. 2):33–41.Google Scholar
25. Tisdale, S. L. and Nelson, W. C. 1975. Cropping systems and soil management. Pages 550–591 in Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 3rd ed. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
26. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wiese, A. F., Chenault, E. W., and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1969. Incorporation of preplant herbicides for cotton. Weed Sci. 17:481–483.Google Scholar