Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:03:50.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Adjuvants on Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Sensitivity to Quizalofop1,2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael A. Ruizzo  and
Stanley F. Gorski
Michael A. Ruizzo
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Dep. Hortic., Columbus, OH 43210
Stanley F. Gorski
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Dep. Hortic., Columbus, OH 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cucumber [Cucumis sativus L. ‘Calypso′] susceptibility to the ethyl ester of quizalofop {2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxyalinyl)oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} was investigated under field and greenhouse conditions. Cucumber yield was significantly reduced under field conditions with a single or repeated application of quizalofop at 0.14 or 0.28 kg ai/ha. Under greenhouse conditions, quizalofop significantly suppressed cucumber plant fresh weight with or without the presence of an adjuvant. Enhancement of herbicide activity was related to the concentration of adjuvant. At a higher rate of quizalofop, addition of the lower concentration of an adjuvant increased the herbicidal effect (growth suppression and visually estimated phytotoxicity). At a lower concentration, increasing adjuvant concentration enhanced visually estimated phytotoxicity.

Keywords

Crop oil concentratenonionic surfactantpostemergence phytotoxicity
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 559 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beste, C. E. 1985. Herbicides for transplanted bell peppers. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:118.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.Google Scholar
3. Chen, Y. Z. and Penner, D. 1985. Combination effects of acifluorfen with crop oil concentrates and postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 31:91–95.Google Scholar
4. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174–177.Google Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. and Foy, C. L. 1962. The chemical and physical nature of plant surfaces in relation to the use of pesticides and their residues. Residue Rev. 1:112–139.Google Scholar
6. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1985. Response of three annual grasses to fluazifop. Weed Sci. 33:693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Foy, C. L. and Smith, L. W. 1969. The role of surfactants in modifying the activity of herbicidal sprays. Pages 55–69 in Gould, R. F., ed. Pesticidal Formulations Research, Am. Chem. Soc., Adv. in Chem. Series 86, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., and Bode, L. E. 1986. Influence of adjuvants and application variables on postemergence weed control with bentazon and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:462–466.Google Scholar
9. Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides for soybeans. Weed Sci. 31:557–561.Google Scholar
10. Hodgson, R. H. 1982. Preface. Pages i–ii in Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
11. Ikai, T., Suzuki, K., Hattori, K., and Igarashi, H. 1985. The site of action of quizalofop-ethyl, NCI-96683. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. – Weeds. Pages 163–169.Google Scholar
12. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, J. R. and Hopen, H. J. 1984. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and onion (Allium cepa) to several postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:168–173.Google Scholar
14. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143–149.Google Scholar
15. Kurtz, M. E. 1983. Experimental herbicides for bermudagrass control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:36.Google Scholar
16. McWhorter, C. G. 1979. The effect of surfactant and environment on the toxicity of metriflufen to soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 27:675–679.Google Scholar
17. Norris, R. F. 1982. Action and fate of adjuvants in plants. Pages 68–83 in Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
18. Sakata, G., Makino, K., Kawamura, K., Ura, Y., Ikai, T., and Kawamura, K. 1983. A new selective herbicide for annual and perennial grass weed control in broadleaf crops. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Plant Prot., pp. 315–323.Google Scholar
19. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1982. Statistical Methods. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa. 507 pp.Google Scholar