Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:49:01.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of DPX-PE350 on the Efficacy of Graminicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kenneth L. Ferreira  and
Harold D. Coble
Kenneth L. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, and quizalofop. DPX-PE350 severely antagonized the activity of fluazifop-P on large crabgrass. Antagonism of sethoxydim and quizalofop was dependent on rate of graminicide and large crabgrass stage of growth at application. DPX-PE350 did not reduce control of johnsongrass with quizalofop. Sethoxydim alone controlled 36 to 71% more johnsongrass than sethoxydim mixed with DPX-PE350 at 35 to 105 g ai ha-1. Antagonism of fluazifop-P activity was dependent upon the rate of DPX-PE350 and fluazifop-P applied. Applying DPX-PE350 3 d after fluazifop-P or sethoxydim reduced antagonism. Grass species, growth stage, rate, and sequential application timing all appear to play a role in the severity of antagonism.

Keywords

DPX-PE350, sodium 2-chloro-6-(4,5-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl-thio)benzoatefluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquizalofop, (α)-2-[4[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onelarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAAntagonismfluazifop-PsethoxydimquizalofopDIGSASORHA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 222 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bryson, T. C., Snipes, C. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control and cotton growth and yield. Page 957 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8–13, 1991. Nat. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:258–262.Google Scholar
3. Byrd, J. D. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Interference of selected weeds in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 5:263–269.Google Scholar
4. Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 35:270–276.Google Scholar
5. Crawford, S. H., Vidrine, P. R., and Collins, R. K. 1989. Preliminary evaluation of DPX-T9595 and KIH-8921 for weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:106.Google Scholar
6. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1985. Uptake and translocation of fluazifop by three annual grasses. Weed Sci. 33:612–617.Google Scholar
7. Dowler, C. C. 1991. Pre and postemergence activity of PE-350 on weeds in cotton. Page 957 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8–13, 1991. Nat. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
8. Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Potential interactions with DPX-PE350 in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:48.Google Scholar
9. Frans, R. E., Morris, G., and Appleberry, M. 1971. Effect of topical herbicide applications on growth and yield of cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:92.Google Scholar
10. Hahn, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1988. The interaction between chlorimuron and quizalofop among several grass species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:360.Google Scholar
11. Hahn, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1989. Characterization of the antagonistic interaction between quizalofop and chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:276.Google Scholar
12. Henniger, C. G., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1990. Evaluation of KIH-8921 in cotton on the Texas southern high plains. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:106.Google Scholar
13. Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
14. Kollmer, C. W. and Coble, H. D. 1988. Mechanism of the antagonistic interaction between fluazifop-P and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:305.Google Scholar
15. Mitchell, W. H. 1992. Cotton weed control with DPX-PE350 “A southern perspective.” Page 958 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 6–10, 1992. Nat. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
16. Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–431.Google Scholar
18. Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Millhollon, L. P. 1990. Weed control and cotton tolerance with KIH-8921. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:137.Google Scholar