Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:25:57.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Ensiling and Rumen Digestion by Cattle on Weed Seed Viability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw  and
Lyle M. Rode
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Lyle M. Rode
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted to determine the effect of ensiling and/or rumen digestion by cattle on the germination and viability of several common weed species. Seed survival of grass species subjected to ensiling and/or rumen digestion tended to be less than that of broadleaf species. Downy brome, foxtail barley, and barnyardgrass were nonviable after either ensiling for 8 weeks or rumen digestion for 24 h. Some green foxtail (17%) and wild oats (0 to 88%) seeds survived digestion in the rumen but were killed by the ensiling process. Varying percentages of seeds of kochia, redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, wild buckwheat, round-leaved mallow, and field pennycress remained viable after ensiling (3 to 30%), rumen digestion (15 to 98%), and ensiling plus rumen digestion (2 to 19%). A time course study of rumen digestion indicated that loss of seed viability often was not a gradual process. With some species, there was an initial lag phase while degradation of the protective seed coat likely occurred, followed by a rapid decline in embryo viability. The diet fed to livestock appeared to affect viability losses caused by rumen digestion. Estimates of seed survival with varying rates of passage through the rumen due to differing ratios of grain to forage in the diet are presented.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEfield pennycress, Thlaspi arvense L. # THLARflixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. ex Prantl. # DESSOfoxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum L. # HORJUgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. # KCHSCredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREround-leaved mallow, Malva pusilla Sm.wild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. # POLCOwild oats, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAWeed seed disseminationweed seed germinationweed seed survivalAMAREAVEFABROTECHEALDESSOECHCGHORJUKCHSCPOLCOSETVITHLAR
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 104 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Atkeson, F. W., Hulbert, H. W., and Warren, T. R. 1934. Effect of bovine digestion and of manure storage on the viability of weed seeds. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 26:390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Beach, C. L. 1908. Viability of weed seeds in feeding stuffs. Vermont Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 138.Google Scholar
3. Best, K. F. and McIntyre, G. I. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 9. Thlaspi arvense L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carter, E. D. 1983. Seed and seedling dynamics of annual medic pastures in South Australia. Pages 440–477 in Proc. XIV Int. Grassl. Congr., Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
5. Dastgheib, F. 1989. Relative importance of crop seed, manure and irrigation water as sources of weed infestation. Weed Res. 29:113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dore, W. G. and Raymond, L. C. 1942. Viable seeds in pasture soil and manure. Sci. Agric. 23:69–79.Google Scholar
7. Estell, R. E. and Galyean, M. L. 1986. Relationship of rumen fluid dilution rate to rumen fermentation and dietary characteristics of beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fitch, J. B. and Zahnley, J. W. 1931. Weeds used as silage. Kansas Industrialist, Manhattan, KS. Pages 4–5.Google Scholar
9. Frankton, C. and Mulligan, G. A. 1987. Weeds of Canada. Publ. No. 948. New Canada Publications, NC Press Ltd., Toronto, Ontario. 217 pp.Google Scholar
10. Gardener, C. J., McIvor, J. G., and Jansen, A. 1983. Survival of seeds in the digestive tract and faeces of cattle. Pages 120–121 in Annu. Rep. 1982–83. (CSIRO Division of Tropical Pastures: Brisbane, Australia.) Google Scholar
11. Grabe, D. F., ed. 1970. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 29, Handbook on Seed Testing. Assoc. of Official Seed Analysts. 62 pp.Google Scholar
12. Harmon, G. W. and Keim, F. D. 1934. The percentage and viability of weed seeds recovered in the feces of farm animals and their longevity when buried in manure. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 26:762–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Harvey, G. J. 1981. Recovery and viability of prickly acacia (Acacia nilotica ssp. indica) seed ingested by sheep and cattle. Proc. 6th Aust. Weeds Conf. Vol. 1:197–201.Google Scholar
14. Lehrer, W. P. and Tisdale, E. W. 1956. Effect of sheep and rabbit digestion on the viability of some range plant seeds. J. Range Manage. 9:118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. McAllister, T. A., Rode, L. M., Major, D. J., Cheng, K.-J., and Buchanan-Smith, J. G. 1990. Effect of ruminal microbial colonization on cereal grain digestion. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 70:571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Mertens, D. R. and Loften, J. R. 1980. The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 63:1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Mitamura, T., Ogawa, Y., and Kamata, E. 1982. Studies on the Zoysia type grassland. I. The number of seed grains and their germination of Zoysia japonica in cattle dung deposited on the grassland. J. Jpn. Soc. Grassl. Sci. 27:389–393.Google Scholar
18. Owens, F. N. and Goetsch, A. L. 1986. Digesta passage and microbial protein synthesis. Pages 219–223 in Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L., and Dobson, A., eds. Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
19. Ozer, Z. 1979. The influence of passage through sheep on the seeds of meadow plants. Weed Res. 19:247–254.Google Scholar
20. Piggin, C. M. 1978. Dispersal of Echium plantagineum L. by sheep. Weed Res. 18:155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Simao Neto, M. and Jones, R. M. 1987. Recovery of pasture seed ingested by ruminants. 2. Digestion of seed in sacco and in vitro. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27:247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Simao Neto, M., Jones, R. M., and Ratcliff, D. 1987. Recovery of pasture seed ingested by ruminants. 1. Seed of six tropical pasture species fed to cattle, sheep and goats. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27:239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. Pages 471–472.Google Scholar
24. Suckling, F.E.T. 1950. The passage of white clover seeds through the body of sheep and the effect on germination capacity. Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc. 12:108–121.Google Scholar
25. Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 0 & B Books, Corvallis, OR. Pages 211–229.Google Scholar
26. Woodford, J. A., Jorgensen, N. A., and Barrington, G. P. 1986. Impact of dietary fiber and physical form on performance of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1035–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Yamada, T. and Kawaguchi, T. 1972. Dissemination of pasture plants by livestock. 2. Recovery, viability, and emergence of some pasture plant seeds passed through the digestive tract of dairy cow. J. Jpn. Soc. Grassl. Sci. 18:8–15.Google Scholar