Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:57:29.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, G. max interference, and weed-free period on Solanum ptycanthum growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael P. Crotser  and
W. W. Witt
W. W. Witt
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40646
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Additive and replacement series studies were conducted to investigate the effect of Glycine max cultivar canopy characteristics, interference, and weed-free period on the vegetative and reproductive growth of Solanum ptycanthum. Solanum ptycanthum established 0, 2, and 4 wk after planting (WAP) did not reduce seed yield of either Group II (Pioneer 9273) or Group IV (Asgrow 4715) varieties. The Group IV variety intercepted a greater percentage of light throughout the season. However, both varieties reduced growth of S. ptycanthum established 2 and 4 WAP, suggesting no disadvantage of Group II in suppressing S ptycanthum growth. The greenhouse and field replacement series experiments indicated that S. ptycanthum plants experienced greater intraspecific than interspecific competition; that is, S. ptycanthum grew more in mixed species competition than in monoculture. Under field conditions, G. max grew equally well in competition with S. ptycanthum or in monoculture. However, in the greenhouse G. max accumulated more biomass and fruit weight in monoculture vs. competition with S. ptycanthum. Relative yield total values (RYT) in the field supported greater productivity per unit area for mixed species competition when compared to G. max or S. ptycanthum grown in monoculture. Data from both studies suggested that S. ptycanthum did not reduce G. max yield when grown in the field. Regardless of maturity group, a fully developed G. max canopy reduced S. ptycanthum growth.

Keywords

Solanum ptycanthum Dun. SOLPT, eastern black nightshadeGlycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Pioneer’ 9273, ‘Asgrow’ 4715, soybeanGroup II soybeanGroup IV soybeancanopy closurelight interceptionweed plant-backweed biomassplant relative yieldrelative yield totaladditive designreplacement seriesSOLPT
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 20 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bozsa, R. C. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Shoot and root interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 41:34–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussan, A. J., Burnside, O. C., Orf, J. H., Ristau, E. A., and Puettmann, K. J. 1997. Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes for weed competitiveness. Weed Sci. 45:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotser, M. P. and Masiunas, J. B. 1998. The effect of weed-free period and nitrogen on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) competition with English pea (Pisum sativum) . Hort. Sci. 33:88–91.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T. 1960. On competition. Versl Landbouwkd Onderz. 66:1–82.Google Scholar
Egli, D. B. 1988. Plant density and soybean yield. Crop Sci. 28:977–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1981. Stages of Soybean Development. 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Iowa Cooperative Extension Service Special Report 80. 12 p.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Mitch, L. W., and Radosevich, S. R. 1984. Interference among bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) . Weed Sci. 32:336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gift, N. 1995. The Soybean Canopy Opens: Effects of Maturity Group on Yield, Weed Emergence, and Harvest Interference. . University of Kentucky, Department of Agronomy. 81 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, L. J. and Steele, C. 1995. On-station testing of early maturing soybean cultivars. Agron. Abst. 87:54.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K. 1990. Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, T.W. and Bauman, T. T. 1989. Interference between soybean (Glycine max). and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37:753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant responses to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. L., Banks, P. A., and Karnik, K. J. 1988. Interference of soybean, Glycine max, cultivars with sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia . Weed Technol. 2:404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. E. Jr. and Walker, R. H. 1993. Effect of interspecific interference, light intensity, and soil moisture on soybean (Glycine max), and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) water uptake. Weed Sci. 41:534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. A. and Purcell, L. C. 1997. Interference between hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) and soybean (Glycine max) in response to irrigation and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 45:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. K. and Ilinicki, R. D. 1983. Some preliminary studies on the biology and control of black nightshade. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 37:19.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Maxwell, B. D., Buhler, D. D., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) recruitment, survival, seed production, and interference in soybean. Weed Sci. 43:226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Herron, J. W. 1986. Eastern black nightshade: a growing concern in Kentucky. Proc. South. Weed Sci Soc. 39:381.Google Scholar
McGiffen, M. E. Jr. and Masiunas, J. B. 1992. Prediction of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) growth using degree days. Weed Sci. 40:86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, S. E., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) . Weed Sci. 41:568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, H. 1986. Coaction between pigment systems. Pages 547–564 In Kendrick, R. E. and Kronenberg, G.H.M., eds. Photomorphogenisis in Plants. Dordrecht: Marthinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosier, D. G. and Oliver, L. R. 1995a. Soybean interference (Glycine max) with common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 43:402.409. Mosier, D. G. and L. R. Oliver. 1995b. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula) interference with soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 43:239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:25–58.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, B. S. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 31:180–184.Google Scholar
Perez, F.G.M. and Masiunas, J. B. 1990. Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) interference in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) . Weed Sci. 42:579–585.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, L.S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) . Weed Sci. 32:638–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Weed Management. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Bakelana, K. B. 1995. Crop planting pattern effects on early growth and canopy shape of cultivated and wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Harrison, K. 1993. Compensatory response of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) to partial shading. Weed Sci. 41:541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) . Weed Sci. 37:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, C. D. and Chandler, J. 1993. Interaction of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) plants for water is affected by their interaction for light. Weed Sci. 41:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattin, M., Zuin, M. C., and Sartorato, I. 1994. Light quality beneath field-grown maize, soybean, and wheat canopies—red : far red variations. Physiol. Plant. 91:322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shilling, E. E. 1981. Systematics of Solanum sect. Solanum (Solanaceae) in North America. Syst. Bot. 6:172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. E. and Jordan, P. W. 1993. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) shoot structure as affected by soybean (Glycine max) interference. Weed Sci. 41:75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C., Grabau, L. J., and Bitzer, M. J. 1995. On-farm testing of early maturing soybean varieties. Agron. Abst. 87:54.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989a. Effects on shading and soybean (Glycine max L.) interference in Solanum ptycanthum (Dun.) (eastern black nightshade) growth and development. Weed Res. 29:307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989b. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synder, K. M., Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. 1994. Comparative ecology of the narrow endemic Echinacea tennesseensis and two geographically widespread congeners: relative competitive ability and growth characteristics. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C. E. and Witt, W. W. 1987. Germination of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata), smooth groundcherry (Physalis virginiana), and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) . Weed Sci. 35:58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Influence of interference from a mixed weed species stand on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar