Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:34:24.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of glyphosate-treated henbit (Lamium amplexicaule) and downy brome (Bromus tectorum) on Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael K. Kawate ,
Susan G. Colwell ,
Alex G. Ogg Jr.  and
John M. Kraft
Susan G. Colwell
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
John M. Kraft
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Irrigated Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350-9687
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the following: if treating henbit or downy brome with glyphosate increased populations of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum in soil and rhizosphere soil; if treating henbit or downy brome with glyphosate increased root colonization and infection by F. solani f. sp. pisi or P. ultimum; and, if henbit and downy brome are hosts of F. sohni f. sp. pisi or P. ultimum. Pythium ultimum populations increased only in soil containing glyphosate-treated henbit. Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and P. ultimum populations increased in rhizosphere soil from glyphosate-treated henbit, while only P. ultimum populations increased in rhizosphere soil from glyphosate-treated downy brome. These results suggest that peas planted in soil where either downy brome or henbit had been treated with glyphosate could be exposed to higher populations of F. solani f. sp. pisi and P. ultimum. Root colonization and infection, plant height, and root weight data indicated that henbit and downy brome are alternate hosts of P. ultimum. F. sohni f. sp. pisi colonized, but did not readily infect roots of downy brome and henbit.

Keywords

Glyphosatedowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. BROTEhenbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. LAMAMPea, Pisum sativum L.Rhizospherehostcolonizationinfection
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 739 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blowes, W. M. 1987. Effect of ryegrass root residues, knockdown herbicides, and fungicides on the emergence of barley in sandy soils. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27: 785–790.Google Scholar
Charchar, M. and Kraft, J. M. 1989. Responses of near-isogenic pea cultivars to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi races 1 and 5. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69: 1335–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, P. R., Thomas, A. G., Cunningham, R. B., and Moore, P.H.R. 1987. Response by wheat, rape, and field peas to pre-sowing herbicides and deep tillage. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27: 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. H. 1965. Water content. Pages 82–127 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Properties Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Grossbard, E. 1985. Effects of glyphosate on the microflora: with reference to the decomposition of treated vegetation and interaction with some plant pathogens. in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Boston, MA: Butterworths, pp. 159–185.Google Scholar
Hendrix, F. F. Jr. and Campbell, W. A. 1973. Pythiums as plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 11: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johal, G. S. and Rahe, J. E. 1984. Effect of soilborne plant-pathogenic fungi on the herbicidal action of glyphosate on bean seedlings. Phytopathology 74: 950–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawate, M. K. and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Effect of soil pH on availability of glyphosate in soil to germinating ryegrass seedlings. J. Appl. Seed Prod. 5: 45–49.Google Scholar
Kawate, M. K., Kawate, S. C., Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Kraft, J. M. 1992. Response of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 40: 497–502.Google Scholar
Kerr, A. 1963. The root rot-Fusarium wilt complex of peas. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 16: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, A. 1964. The influence of soil moisture on infection of peas by Pythium ultimum . Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 17: 676–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, J. M. 1985. Pea root pathogen populations in relation to soil structure, compaction, and water content. in Parker, C. A., Rovira, A. D., Moore, K. J., Wong, P.T.W., and Kollmorgen, J. F., eds. Ecology and Management of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Melbourne, Australia: American Phytopathological Society, Proc. Section 5 of the 4th Int. Cong. of Plant Pathol., pp. 203–205.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. M. and Burke, D. W. 1971. Pythium ultimum as a root pathogen of beans and peas in Washington. Plant Dis. Rep. 55: 1056–1060.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. M., Burke, D. W., and Haglund, W. A. 1981. Fusarium diseases of beans, peas, and lentils. in Nelson, P. E., Toussoun, T. A., and Cook, R. J., eds. Fusarium: Diseases, Biology, and Taxonomy. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 142–156.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. M. and Erwin, O. C. 1967. Effects of nitrogen sources on growth and Pythium aphanidermatum and Pythium ultimum . Phytopathology 57: 374–376.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. M. and Roberts, D. D. 1969. Influence of soil water and temperature on the pea root rot complex caused by Pythium ultimum and Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi. Phytopathology 59: 149–152.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. M., Wilkins, D. E., Ogg, A. G. Jr., Williams, L., and Willett, G. G. 1991. Integrated Pest Management Practices for Green Peas in the Blue Mountain Region. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Extension Bull. EB 1599.Google Scholar
Lévesque, C. A. and Rahe, J. E. 1992. Herbicide interactions with fungal root pathogens, with special reference to glyphosate. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30: 579–602.Google Scholar
Lévesque, C. A., Rahe, J. E., and Eaves, D. M. 1987. Effect of glyphosate on Fusarium spp.: its influence on root colonization of weeds, propagule density in the soil, and crop emergence. Can. J. Microbiol. 33: 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévesque, C. A., Rahe, J. E., and Eaves, D. M. 1993. Fungal colonization of glyphosate-treated seedlings using a new root plating technique. Mycol. Res. 97: 299–306.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. M. and Penn, D. J. 1980. Damage to cereals caused by decaying weed residue. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31: 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuo, T. and Snyder, W. C. 1972. Host virulence and the hypomyces stage of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi. Phytopathology 62: 731–735.Google Scholar
Mircetich, S. M. 1971. The role of Pythium in feeder roots of diseased and symptomless peach trees and in orchard soils in peach tree decline. Phytopathology 61: 357–360.Google Scholar
Nash, S. M. and Snyder, W. C. 1962. Quantitative estimations by plate counts of propagules of the bean root rot Fusarium in field soil. Phytopathology 52: 567–572.Google Scholar
Pittaway, P. A. 1995. Opportunistic association between Pythium species and weed residues causing seedling emergence failure in cereals. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46: 655–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaats-Niterink, A. J. vander. 1981. Monograph of the Genus Pythium. Studies in Mycology 21. Baarn, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, 244 p.Google Scholar
Rahe, J. E., Lévesque, C. A., and Johal, G. S. 1990. Synergistic role of soil fungi in the herbicidal efficacy of glyphosate. in Hoagland, R. E., ed. Microbes and Microbial Products as Herbicides. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Symposium Ser. 439, pp. 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovira, A. D. and Venn, N. R. 1985. Effect of rotation and tillage on take-all and Rhizoctonia root rot in wheat. in Parker, C. A., Rovira, A. D., Moore, K. J., Wong, P.T.W., and Kollmorgen, J. F., eds. Ecology and Management of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Melbourne, Australia: American Phytopathological Society, Proc. Section 5 of the 4th Int. Cong. of Plant Pathology, pp. 255–258.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT™ User&s Guide. Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Salazar, L. C. and Appleby, A. P. 1982. Herbicidal activity of glyphosate in soil. Weed Sci. 30: 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, R. W., Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Cook, R. J. 1992. Influence of glyphosate on Rhizoctonia root rot, growth, and yield of barley. Plant Dis. 76: 937–942.Google Scholar
Torstensson, L. 1985. Behavior of glyphosate in soils and its degradation. in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Boston, MA: Butterworths, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar