Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:32:27.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Tillage and Cover Crop on Fluometuron Adsorption and Degradation under Controlled Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Blake A. Brown
Affiliation:
Dept. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
Dept. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901
Donald D. Tyler
Affiliation:
Dept. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901
Thomas C. Mueller
Affiliation:
Dept. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901

Abstract

Fluometuron adsorption and degradation were determined in soil collected at three depths from no-till + no cover, conventional-till + no cover, no-till + vetch cover, and conventional-till + vetch cover in continuous cotton. These combinations of tillage + cover crop + soil depth imparted a range of organic matter and pH to the soil. Soil organic matter and pH ranged from 0.9 to 2.5% and from 4.7 to 6.5, respectively. Fluometuron adsorption was affected by soil depth, tillage, and cover crop. In surface soils (0 to 4 cm), fluometuron adsorption was greater in no-till + vetch plots than in conventional-tilled + no cover plots. Soil adsorption of fluometuron was positively correlated with organic matter content and cation exchange capacity. Fluometuron degradation was not affected by adsorption, and degradation empirically fit a first-order model. Soil organic matter content had no apparent effect on fluometuron degradation rate. Fluometuron degradation was more rapid at soil pH > 6 than at pH ≤ 5, indicating a potential shift in microbial activity or population due to lower soil pH. Fluometuron half-life ranged from 49 to 90 d. These data indicate that tillage and cover crop may affect soil dissipation of fluometuron by altering soil physical and chemical properties that affect fluometuron degrading microorganisms or bioavailability.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouchard, D. C., Lavy, T. L., and Marx, D. B. 1982. Fate of metribuzin, metolachlor, and fluometuron in soil. Weed Sci. 30:629632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Effect of tillage and cover crop on fluometuron dissipation in soil. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:350.Google Scholar
3. Liu, L. C. and Cibes-Viade, H. R. 1973. Adsorption of fluometuron, prometryn, metribuzin, and 2,4-D by soils. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico. 57:286293.Google Scholar
4. Mueller, T. C. and Moorman, T. B. 1991. Liquid chromatographic determination of fluometuron and metabolites in soil. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 74:671673.Google Scholar
5. Mueller, T. C., Moorman, T. B., and Snipes, C. E. 1992. Effect of concentration, sorption, and microbial biomass on degradation of the herbicide fluometuron in surface and subsurface soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:25172522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Paul, E. A. and Clark, F. E. 1989. Occurrence and Distribution of Soil Organisms. Pages 7587 in Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press.Google Scholar
7. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Residual fluometuron levels in.Google Scholar
8. Savage, K. E. and Wauchope, R. D. 1974. Fluometuron adsorption-desorption equilibria in soil. Weed Sci. 22:106110.Google Scholar
9. Statistical Analysis Software user's manual. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
10. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:4652.Google Scholar