Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T02:24:05.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clarence J. Swanton ,
Anil Shrestha ,
Robert C. Roy ,
Bonnie R. Ball-Coelho  and
Stevan Z. Knezevic
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Robert C. Roy
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Laboratory, Southern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre, Delhi, Ontario, Canada N4B 2W9
Bonnie R. Ball-Coelho
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Laboratory, Southern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre, Delhi, Ontario, Canada N4B 2W9
Stevan Z. Knezevic
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adoption of conservation tillage systems has been challenged by concerns potential weed species shifts. A 9-yr study from 1988 to 1996 was conducted Delhi, Ontario, on a loamy sand soil to evaluate the effect of tillage systems (conventional [CT] and no-till [NT]), cover crop Secale cereale, and nitrogen (N) rate (0, 50, 100, 125, 150, and 200 kg N ha−1) on monocrop Zea mays L. (corn) yield and changes in the composition of the weed flora. CT consisted of spring moldboard plowing followed by cultivation with a tooth cultivator. Weed counts were taken in the last 3 yr of the study (1994, 1995, and 1996) prior to postemergence herbicide application and then again 2 to 3 wk after herbicide treatment. Composition or the weed flora was analyzed by canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The relationship between weed density and tillage system was not consistent. Weed species composition differed between CT and NT systems. Chenopodium album and Amaranthus retroflexus were associated with CT and Digitaria sanguinalis with NT. N rate and cover crop did not affect weed density or species composition. Proper management of weeds with herbicides appeared to minimize any long-term effect on the weed flora resulting from varying N rates. Zea mays yields did not differ between CT and NT systems but were greater in both systems with a cover crop at the higher N rates. Disturbance caused by tillage was more important than N rate and cover crop as a mechanism influencing composition of the weed flora.

Keywords

Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMARE, redroot pigweedDigitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA, large crabgrassChenopodium album L. CHEAL, common lambsquartersEuphorbia vermiculata Raf. EUPVE, hairy-stemmed spurgeMolluga verticillata L. MOLVE, carpetweedPortulaca oleracea L. POROL, common purslaneSecale cereale L., ryeZea mays L., cornCanonical discriminant analysiscropping systemsintegrated weed managementweed shiftsAMAREDIGSACHEALEUPVEMOLVEPOROL

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , August 1999 , pp. 454 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. L., Tanaka, D. L., Black, A. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1998. Weed community and species response to crop rotation, tillage, and nitrogen fertility. Weed Technol. 12:531–536.Google Scholar
Andersson, T. N. and Milberg, P. 1996. Weed performance in crop rotations with and without leys and at different nitrogen levels. Ann. Appl. Biol. 128:505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T. N. and Milberg, P. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 46:30–38.Google Scholar
Ball-Coelho, B. R. and Roy, R. C. 1997. Overseeding rye into corn reduces NO3 leaching and increases yields. Can. J. Soil Sci. 77:443–451.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A., Santelmann, P. W., and Tucker, B. B. 1976. Influence of long-term soil fertility treatments on weed species in winter wheat. Agron. J. 68:825–827.Google Scholar
Barberi, P., Silvestri, N., and Bonari, E. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Res. 37:301–313.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1045–1057.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1979. The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:351–371.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R., Larney, F. O., Lindwall, C. W., and Kozub, G. C. 1994. Crop rotation and tillage effects on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Weed Technol. 8:231–237.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci. 42:205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1986. Wild oats (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.Google Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D. L., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44:314–322.Google Scholar
Clements, D. R., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection 75:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publ. 242, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Cromar, H. E., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Influence of tillage and crop residue on postdispersal predation of weed seeds. Weed Sci. 47:184–194.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: fallow within tillage systems. Weed Sci. 42:184–194.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Impact of post-emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation tillage systems. Weed Res. 35:311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491–497.Google Scholar
Einhellig, F. A. and Leather, G. R. 1988. Potentials for exploiting allelopathy to enhance crop production. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:951–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:594–596.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. Pages 213–236 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, PL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. and Nuttall, M. 1971. Studies on weed species of the genus Polygonum . VII. Effect of nutrition and other factors on seed characteristics and germination behaviour of P. lapathifolim. Weed Res. 11:94–98.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Roth, G. W. 1993. Effect of prior year's weed control on herbicide effectiveness in com (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, L., Tessier, S., and Dyck, F. B. 1991. Tillage and rotation influences on weed community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in southwestern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørnsgård, B., Rasmussen, K., Hill, J., and Christiansen, J. L. 1996. Influence on competition between cereals and their natural weed populations. Weed Res. 36:461–470.Google Scholar
Kirkham, F. W. and Kent, M. 1997. Soil seed bank composition in relation to the above-ground vegetation in fertilized and unfertilized hay meadows on a Somerset peat moot. J. Appl. Ecol. 34:889–902.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. and Beckie, H. J. 1998. Contribution of nitrogen fertilizer placement to weed management in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 12:507–514.Google Scholar
Klecka, W. R. 1980. Discriminant Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 71 p.Google Scholar
Leather, G. R. 1983. Weed control using allelopathic crop plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:983–989.Google Scholar
Légère, A. and Samson, N. 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci. 47:112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M., Corson, S., Rowe, R. J., and Halteman, W. A. 1995. Dry bean responses to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems. Agron. J. 87:538–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M. and Robichaux, R. H. 1990. Competition by barley and pea against mustard: effects on resource acquisition, photosynthesis and yield. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 31:155–172.Google Scholar
Mahn, E. G. 1988. Changes in the structure of weed communities affected by agro-chemicals—what role does nitrogen play? Ecol. Bull. 39:71–73.Google Scholar
Miles, J. 1979. Vegetation Dynamics. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Calloway, M. B. 1992. Effects of tillage and mulch on the emergence and survival of weeds in sweet corn. J. Appl. Ecol. 29:21–34.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth. and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33:487–499.Google Scholar
Moore, M. J., Gillespie, T. J., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Effect of cover crop mulches on weed emergence, weed biomass and soybean (Glycine max) development. Weed Technol. 8:512–518.Google Scholar
Mountford, J. O., Lakhani, K. H., and Kirkham, F. W. 1993. Experimental assessment of the effects of nitrogen addition under hay-cutting and aftermath grazing on the vegetation of meadows on a Somerset peat moor. J. Appl. Ecol. 30:321–332.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., McAndrew, D. W., and Thomas, A. G. 1997. Tillage and nitrogen influence weed population dynamics in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Weed Technol. 11:502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Environment influences green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 6:607–610.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1983. Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Prot. 2:173–181.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R., DeFrank, J., and Barnes, J. P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1001–1010.Google Scholar
Pysek, P. and Leps, J. 1991. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 2:237–244.Google Scholar
Reader, R. J. 1991. Control of seedling emergence by ground cover: a potential mechanism involving seed predation. Can. J. Bot. 69:2084–2087.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F. C., Légère, A., Simard, R. R., Angers, D. A., Pageau, D., and Lafond, J. 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci. 45:798–806.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol. 7:286–297.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Vyn, T. J., Chandler, K., and Shrestha, A. 1998. Weed management strategies for no-till soybean (Glycine max) grown on clay soils. Weed Technol. 12:660–669.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85:673–680.Google Scholar
Theaker, A. J., Boatman, N. D., and Froud-Williams, R. J. 1995. The effect of nitrogen fertiliser on the growth of Bromus sterilis in field boundary vegetation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 53:185–192.Google Scholar
Tsiouris, S. and Marshall, E.J.P. 1998. Observations on patterns of granular fertiliser deposition beside hedges and its likely effects on the botanical composition of field margins. Ann. Appl. Biol. 132:115–127.Google Scholar
Zanin, G., Otto, S., Riello, L., and Borin, M. 1997. Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 66:177–188.Google Scholar
Zasada, I. A., Linker, H. M., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Initial weed densities affect no-tillage weed management with a rye (Secale cereale) cover crop. Weed Technol. 11:473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar