Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:30:05.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Chilling on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), and Spurred Anoda (Anoda cristata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Patterson  and
E. P. Flint
D. T. Patterson
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric, Stoneville, MS 38776 and Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
E. P. Flint
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric, Stoneville, MS 38776 and Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of short exposures to low temperature on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 213′), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic), and spurred anoda [Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht.] were studied in controlled environment chambers. A 3-day exposure to 17/13 C day/night temperatures 24 days after planting significantly reduced dry weight, leaf area and height in all three species when compared to control plants maintained at 26/21 C day/night. After subsequent periods of 7 days at 26/21 C and 8 days at 29/23 C, the two weed species recovered in growth more completely than did cotton. Therefore, the weed/crop ratios for dry weight and leaf area were increased by the imposition of the cold treatment. Mathematical analysis of the growth of the three species indicated that the growth reductions during the cold treatment were caused by decreases in both net assimilation rate and leaf area duration. The net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductances of individual leaves of cotton and velvetleaf were significantly reduced during the cold treatment but recovered to control levels during a subsequent 4-day exposure to 26/21 C. We conclude that the adverse effects of low temperatures on the growth of cotton, velvetleaf, and spurred anoda are caused mainly by reductions in leaf area production. Because of its slower and less complete recovery, cotton is more severely affected by low temperature than either of the two weeds. Our results help explain the observation that velvetleaf and spurred anoda are more competitive with cotton following abnormally cool periods early in the growing season.

Keywords

Temperaturephotosynthesisgrowth-analysiscompetition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 1979 , pp. 473 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. K. 1971. Emergence and early growth responses of cotton to controlled temperature regimes. Cotton Grow. Rev. 48:104–115.Google Scholar
2. Auld, B. A., Dennett, M. D., and Elston, J. 1978. The effect of temperature changes on the expansion of individual leaves of Vicia faba L. Ann. Bot. 42:877–888.Google Scholar
3. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
4. Christiansen, M. N. 1971. Biochemical and physical responses to chilling by germinating cotton. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Proc. 1971:71–72.Google Scholar
5. Cole, D. F. and Christiansen, M. N. 1975. Effect of chilling duration on germination of cottonseed. Crop Sci. 15:410–412.Google Scholar
6. Constable, G. A. 1976. Temperature effects on the early field development of cotton. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. and Animal Husb. 16:905–910.Google Scholar
7. Crookston, R. K., O'Toole, J., Lee, R., Ozbun, J. L., and Wallace, D. H. 1974. Photosynthetic depression in beans after exposure to cold for one night. Crop Sci. 14:457–464.Google Scholar
8. Drake, B. and Raschke, K. 1974. Prechilling of Xanthium strumarium L. reduces net photosynthesis and independently, stomatal conductance while sensitizing the stomata to CO2 . Plant Physiol. 53:808–812.Google Scholar
9. Freese, F. 1967. Elementary statistical methods for foresters. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 317. 87 pp.Google Scholar
10. Hilliard, J. H. and West, S. H. 1970. Starch accumulation associated with growth reduction at low temperatures in a tropical plant. Science 168:494–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jarvis, P. G. 1971. The estimation of resistance to carbon dixoide transfer. Pages 566–631 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
12. Jividen, G. M. 1972. Cottonseed membrane structural transition as a result of physiological phenomena associated with chilling. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Proc. 1972:31.Google Scholar
13. Kanemasu, E. T., Thurtle, G. W., and Tanner, C. B. 1969. Design, calibration, and use of a stomatal diffusion porometer. Plant Physiol. 44:881–888.Google Scholar
14. Kramer, P. J. 1969. Plant and Soil Water Relationships. A Modern Synthesis. McGraw-Hill, New York. 482 pp.Google Scholar
15. Kramer, P. J., Helmers, H., and Downs, R. J. 1970. SEPEL: new phytotrons for environmental research. BioScience 20:1201–1208.Google Scholar
16. Krieg, D. R. and Carroll, J. D. 1978. Cotton seedling metabolism as influenced by germination temperature, cultivar, and seed physical properties. Agron. J. 70:21–25.Google Scholar
17. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343–391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
18. Ludlow, M. M. and Wilson, G. L. 1971. Photosynthesis of tropical pasture plants. II. Temperature and illuminance history. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24:1065–1075.Google Scholar
19. McQuigg, J. D. and Calvert, O. H. 1966. Influence of soil temperatures on the emergence and initial growth of upland cotton. Agric. Meteorol. 3:179–185.Google Scholar
20. Milthorpe, F. L. 1959. Studies on the expansion of the leaf surface. I. The influence of temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 10:233–249.Google Scholar
21. Oliver, D. and Lambert, B. 1974. Today's weed. Spurred anoda. Weeds Today 5(3):22.Google Scholar
22. Omran, R. G., Benedict, C. R., and Powell, R. D. 1971. Effects of chilling on protein synthesis and CO2 fixation in cotton leaves. Crop Sci. 11:554–556.Google Scholar
23. Patterson, D. T. 1979. Light and temperature adaptation. Chapter 8 in Hesketh, J. D. and Jones, J. W., ed. Predicting Photosynthate Production and Use for Ecosystem Models. CRC Press, West Palm Beach, Florida. (In press).Google Scholar
24. Patterson, D. T., Bunce, J. A., Alberte, R. S., and van Volkenburgh, E. 1977. Photosynthesis in relation to leaf characteristics of cotton from controlled and field environments. Plant Physiol. 59:384–387.Google Scholar
25. Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1978. Effects of irradiance on relative growth rates, net assimilation rates, and leaf area partitioning in cotton and three associated weeds. Plant Physiol. 62:14–17.Google Scholar
26. Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., Flint, E. P., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1979. Temperature responses and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:77–82.Google Scholar
27. Potter, J. R. and Jones, J. W. 1977. Leaf area partitioning as an important factor in growth. Plant Physiol. 59:10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Powell, R. D. and Amin, J. V. 1969. Effect of chilling temperatures on the growth and development of cotton. Cotton Grow. Rev. 46:21–28.Google Scholar
29. Rajan, A. K. and Blackman, G. E. 1975. Interacting effects of light and day and night temperatures on the growth of four species in the vegetative phase. Ann. Bot. 39:7733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Stewart, J. McD. and Guinn, G. 1969. Chilling injury and changes in adenosine triphosphate of cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol. 44:605–608.Google Scholar
31. Teeri, J. A., Patterson, D. T., Alberte, R. S., and Castleberry, R. M. 1977. Changes in the photosynthetic apparatus of maize in response to simulated natural temperature fluctuations. Plant Physiol. 60:370–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Wanjura, D. F., Hudspeth, E. B. Jr., and Bilbro, J. D. Jr. 1969. Temperature effect on emergence rate of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under field situations. Agron. J. 61:387–389.Google Scholar
33. Went, F. W. 1957. The experimental control of plant growth. Chron. Bot. 17:1–343.Google Scholar