Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:15:21.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Herbicides on Diseases of Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. Inderawati
Affiliation:
Plant Protection, Georg-August-Universität, 3400 Göttingen-Weende, Germany
R. Heitefuss
Affiliation:
Plant Protection, Georg-August-Universität, 3400 Göttingen-Weende, Germany

Abstract

Seven herbicides were tested for their effect on growth of Pyricularia oryzae Cavara, Hypochnus sasakii Shirai, and Xanthomonas oryzae Uyeda & Ishiyama Dowson on agar media and for subsequent influence on disease intensity on rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) in the greenhouse. The herbicides studied were: propanil 3′,4′-dichloro-propionanilide), NTN 5$006 [O-(2-nitro-4-methylphenyl)-O-ethyl-N-isopropyl-phosphor-amidothioate], simetryn [2,4-bis(ethylamino)-6-)methylthio)-s-triazine], terbutryn [2-(tert-butylamino)-4-(ethylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine], nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether), molinate (S-ethyl hexahydro-1H-azepine-1-carbothioate), and aglypt (4-amino-3-methylthio-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazine-5-on). The growth of P. oryzae, H. sasakii and X. oryzae on culture media containing 10 μg/ml commercial formulation of propanil was reduced to approximately 50% of the control. The other herbicides tested were less effective. Differences in disease severity produced on rice plants treated with the previously mentioned herbicides were in agreement with the results obtained by the culture method. The effect of simetryn and nitrofen on disease severity was stronger than expected from the small direct action on the pathogen in culture. It is suggested that the influence of these two compounds on the disease intensity is due to their effect on the host plant rather than the pathogen directly. Propanil was effective only if applied immediately or up to 1 day before inoculation, indicating that this herbicide is degraded on or within the rice leaves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akai, S. and Oku, H. 1956. Effect of pentachlorophenol compounds upon the susceptibility of rice plants to Helminthosporium leaf spot. Forsch. PflKr. Kyoto 5:159163.Google Scholar
2. Brandes, W. and Heitefuss, R. 1971. Nebenwirkung von Herbiziden auf Erysiphe graminis und Cercosporella herpotrichoides an Weizen. I. Der Befall der Pflanze unter dem Einfluß der Herbizide. Phytopathol. Z. 71:357371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Drandarevski, Ch. and Weltzien, H.C. 1966. Über die Anfärbung von Erysiphaceen durch Joddämpfe. Naturwissenschaften 53:616617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Endo, S., Shinohara, M., and Hara, S. 1965. Effects of PCP-Na herbicide on sheath blight of rice plants. I. The inhibitive mechanism of the PCP-Na herbicide to the occurence of the disease. II. Residual effectiveness of PCP-Na herbicide on Pellicularia sasakii (Shirai) S. Ito in irrigation. Bull. Coll. Agric. Vet. Med. Nihon Univ. 20:1–9; 1117.Google Scholar
5. Frear, D.S. and Still, G.G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloro-propionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Heitefuss, R. 1970. Nebenwirkungen von Herbiziden auf Pflanzenkrankheiten und deren Erreger. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sdh. 5:117127.Google Scholar
7. Heitefuss, R. 1972. Ursachen der Nebenwirkungen von Herbiziden auf Pflanzenkrankheiten. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sdh. 6:7987.Google Scholar
8. Heitefuss, R. 1973. Der Einfluß von Herbiziden auf bodenbürtige Pflanzenkrankheiten. Proc. Eur. Weed. Res. Coun. Symp. Herbicides-Soil:98128.Google Scholar
9. Heitefuss, R. and Bodendoerfer, H. 1968. Der Einfluß von Herbiziden und Kalkstickstoff auf den durch Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron. verursachten Halmbruch des Weizens. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz 75:641659.Google Scholar
10. Heitefuss, R. and Bodendoerfer, H. 1970. Der Einfluß von Herbiziden auf die Erreger von Fußkrankheiten des Getreides, insbesondere Cercosporella herpotrichoides und Ophiobolus graminis . Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz 77:109121.Google Scholar
11. Huber, D.M., Seely, C.I., and Watson, R.D. 1968. Nonfungicidal, chemical control of foot rot of winter wheat with the herbicide diuron. Phytopathology 58:1054.Google Scholar
12. Inoue, Y. and Uchino, K. 1963. Studies on sheath blight of rice plants caused by Pellicularia sasakii (Shirai) S. Ito. I. Ecology of damage and chemical control. Minist. Agric. For. Fish. Res. Council Japan appointed exp. No. 4 at Yamaguchi Agric. Exp. Stn. 136 pp.Google Scholar
13. Kathan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 46:161.Google Scholar
14. Muko, H. and Yoshida, K. 1951. A needle inoculation method for bacterial leaf blight disease of rice. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 15:179.Google Scholar
15. Nn. 1971. Weedless rice fields. Crop. Protect. Courier 2/71, 2:30.Google Scholar
16. Ono, K. and Iwata, K. 1961. Control of sheath blight disease of rice plant by PCP. Nogyo Oyobi Engei 36:7174.Google Scholar
17. Ou, S.H. 1972. Rice diseases. Commenw. Agric. Bureaux. Eastern Press. Ltd., London and Reading, 368 pp.Google Scholar
18. Ripper, W.E. 1964. Side effects of pesticides on plant growth. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 7:10401058.Google Scholar
19. Seaman, D., Vega, M., and Paller, E. 1969. Weed control recommendations for rice. The Philippines Recommends for Rice: 2426.Google Scholar
20. Smith, R.J. Jr. and Templeton, G. 1968. Response of rice to phenoxy herbicides and incidence of brown leaf spot. Arkansas Farm Research 17:4.Google Scholar
21. Takatsu, S. and Nishimura, J. 1962. Studies on the control of sheath blight of rice plant. 4. Effects of sodium salt of pentachlorophenol. Bull. Hyogo Pref. Agric. Exp. Stn. 10:2730.Google Scholar