Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:39:59.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Increasing Grazing Height on Establishment of Pasture Weeds in Management-Intensive Rotationally Grazed Pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark J. Renz  and
Marie L. Schmidt
Mark J. Renz*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison WI 53706
Marie L. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mrenz@wisc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weeds can infest management-intensive grazed pastures and impact forage quantity, forage quality, and animal health. Common burdock, plumeless thistle, and Canada thistle are three common pasture weeds in the midwestern United States that are managed to avoid these impacts. Experiments were established at two sites to determine if increasing grazing heights from fall through summer would reduce emergence and survival of burdock, plumeless thistle, and Canada thistle seedlings. Five simulated grazing heights (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm and a not-clipped treatment) were implemented in October 2008 and repeated in May through August. Density of all species was reduced from May to September, with reductions ranging from 65 to 78%, regardless of treatment. Treatments that left at least 15 cm of residual grass had reduced densities of burdock and Canada thistle compared to the 10-cm treatment. Regression analysis demonstrated that reduction in burdock and summed planted weed density was related to increased intercepted photosynthetically active radiation from forage in April. However, total biomass yield was reduced up to 60% when grazing heights were increased from 5 to 20 cm, although differences were only observed at the fall and early spring grazing events. Relative forage quality (RFQ) was similar across treatments, except at the third grazing event for which the 15 and 20-cm treatments had reduced RFQ compared with other treatments. Results suggest that increasing grazing heights can reduce emergence and survival of burdock and Canada thistle but can also result in a reduction in forage quantity in the fall and early spring.

Keywords

Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scopcommon burdock, Arctium minus Bernhplumeless thistle, Carduus acanthoides LLight interceptionweed emergenceweed survival
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 92 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bakker, J. P., Debie, S., Dallinga, J. H., Tjaden, P., and Devries, Y. 1983. Sheep-grazing as a management tool for heathland conservation and regeneration in the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:541–560.Google Scholar
Blanchet, K., Moechnig, H., and De-Jong-Hughes, J. 2003. Grazing Systems Planning Guide. Extension bulletin BU-07606-S. St. Paul, MN University of Minnesota Extension. 46 p.Google Scholar
Bryan, W. B., Prigge, E. C., Lasat, M., Pasha, T., Flaherty, D. J., and Lozier, J. 2000. Productivity of Kentucky bluegrass pasture grazed at three heights and two intensities. Agron. J. 92:30–35.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J. B., Konieczka, C. M., and Rittmeyer, R. A. 2009. Ability of potato cultivars to tolerate and suppress weeds. Weed Technol. 23:287–291.Google Scholar
Corson, D. C., Waghorn, G. C., Ulyatt, M. J., and Lee, J. 1999. NIRS: forage analysis and livestock feeding. Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc. 61:127–132.Google Scholar
Cross, H. 1931. Laboratory germination of weed seeds. Assoc. Offic. Seed Anal. Proc. 24:125–128.Google Scholar
Cullen, B. R., Chapman, D. F., and Quigley, P. E. 2006. Comparative defoliation tolerance of temperate perennial grasses. Grass Forage Sci. 61:405–412.Google Scholar
De Bruijn, S. L. and Bork, E. W. 2006. Biological control of Canada thistle in temperate pastures using high density rotational cattle grazing. Biol. Control. 36:305–315.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. R., Vesprini, J. L., and Lewis, J. P. 1994. Survival and establishment of Carduus acanthoides L. Weed Res. 34:265–273.Google Scholar
Grace, B. S., Whalley, R. D. B., Sheppard, A. W., and Sindel, B. M. 2002. Managing saffron thistle in pastures with strategic grazing. Rangeland J. 24:313–325.Google Scholar
Grekul, C. W. and Bork, E. W. 2004. Herbage yield losses in perennial pasture due to Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol. 18:784–794.Google Scholar
Hein, D. G. and Miller, S. D. 1992. Influence of leafy spurge on forage utilization by cattle. J. Range Manag. 45:405–407.Google Scholar
Inyang, U., Vendramini, J. M. B., Sellers, B., Silveira, M. L. A., Lunpha, A., Sollenberger, L. E., Adesogan, A., and Paiva, L. M. 2010. Harvest frequency and stubble height affect herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and persistence of ‘Mulato II’ brachiariagrass. Forage Grazing. 10:1–7.Google Scholar
Jutila, H. M. and Grace, J. B. 2002. Effects of disturbance on germination and seedling establishment in a coastal prairie grassland: a test of the competitive release hypothesis. J. Ecol. 90:291–302.Google Scholar
Karn, J. E., Berdahl, J. D., and Frank, A. B. 2006. Nutritive quality of four perennial grasses as affected by species, cultivar, maturity, and plant tissue. Agron. J. 98:1400–1409.Google Scholar
Kirby, D. R., Hanson, T. P., Krabbenhoft, K. D., and Kirby, M. M. 1997. Effects of simulated defoliation on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) infested rangeland. Weed Technol. 11:586–590.Google Scholar
Kruk, B., Insausti, P., Razul, A., and Benech-Arnold, R. 2006. Light and thermal environments as modified by a wheat crop: effects on weed seed germination. J. Appl. Ecol. 43:227–236.Google Scholar
Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P. 2001. Ecological management of agricultural weeds. Cambridge, U.K.; New York Cambridge University Press. 532 p.Google Scholar
Maguire, J. D. and Overland, A. 1959. Laboratory germination of seeds of weedy and native plants. Circ. 349. Pullman, WA Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. 15 p.Google Scholar
Marten, G. C., Sheaffer, C. C., and Wyse, D. L. 1987. Forage nutritive value and palatability of perennial weeds. Agron. J. 79:980–986.Google Scholar
Matches, A. G. 1992. Plant response to grazing—a review. J. Prod. Agric. 5:1–7.Google Scholar
Muto, P. J. and Martin, R. C. 2000. Effects of pre-treatment, renovation procedure and cultivar on the growth of white clover sown into a permanent pasture under both grazing and mowing regimes. Grass Forage Sci. 55:59–68.Google Scholar
Renz, M. J. 2006. Survey results from Pest Management Update Series in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Crop Manager. 13:192 http://ipcm.wisc.edu/WCMNews/tabid/53/EntryId/174/Survey-results-from-Pest-Management-Update-Series-in-Wisconsin.aspx. Accessed: April 13, 2011.Google Scholar
Rinella, M. J. and Hileman, B. J. 2009. Efficacy of prescribed grazing depends on timing intensity and frequency. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:796–803.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Stephens, J. M. C., Verkaaik, M. L., and Rahman, A. 2005. Quantifying the impact of a weed in a perennial ryegrass-white clover pasture. Weed Sci. 53:113–120.Google Scholar
Sellers, B. F., Vendramini, J., and Newman, Y. 2007. Weed management during pasture establishment. Extension bulletion SS AGR 287. Gainesville, FL University of Florida Extension. 2 p.Google Scholar
Sigua, G. C., Williams, M. J., and Coleman, S. W. 2006. Long-term effects of grazing and haying on soil nutrient dynamics in forage-based beef cattle operations. J. Sustain. Agric. 29:115–134.Google Scholar
Taylor, E., Renner, K., and Sprague, C. 2008. Integrated Weed Management: Fine Tuning the System. Extension bulletin E-3065. East Lansing, MI Michigan State University. 132 p.Google Scholar
Undersander, D., Albert, B., Cosgrove, D., Johnson, D., and Peterson, P. 2002. Pastures for Profit: A Guide to Rotational Grazing. Madison, WI Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin. 38 p.Google Scholar
Undersander, D. and Moore, J. E. 2002. Relative Forage Quality. Focus on Forage. http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/RFQvsRFV.htm. Accessed: April 13, 2011.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Nicholson, K. S., Ahmed, M., and Rahman, A. 1995. Influence of pasture forage species on seedling emergence, growth and development of Carduus nutans . J. Appl. Ecol. 32:225–233.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Nicholson, K. S., and Rahman, A. 1992. Influence of pasture grass and legume swards on seedling emergence and growth of Carduus nutans L. and Cirsium vulgare . Weed Res. 32:119–128.Google Scholar
Weiner, J., Wright, D. B., and Castro, S. 1997. Symmetry of below-ground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals. Oikos. 79:85–91.Google Scholar
Willems, J. H. 1983. Species composition and above ground phytomass in chalk grassland with different management. Vegetatio. 52:171–180.Google Scholar
Williams, P. H. and Haynes, R. J. 1990. Influence of improved pastures and grazing animals on nutrient cycling within New Zealand soils. N. Z. J. Ecol. 14:49–57.Google Scholar