Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:42:22.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Supplemental Nitrogen on Shoot Production and Root Bud Dormancy of Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) under Field Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Léonie B. Nadeau  and
William H. Vanden Born
Léonie B. Nadeau
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined effects of supplementary nitrogen on young Canada thistle stands in Alberta, Canada. Urea applied at 70 or 100 kg N ha–1 increased shoot population densities, mostly through increased root growth in the top 20 cm of soil rather than through released root bud dormancy. Nitrogen fertilization, therefore, may increase the severity of a Canada thistle infestation. In 1-yr-old stands, the number of emerged and unemerged root buds/m of root was higher near the soil surface in fertilized plots than in unfertilized plots, and no underground shoots were detected at the time of sampling. In 2-yr-old stands, more unemerged root buds/m of root were found at depths below 20 cm in fertilized plots than in unfertilized plots, and twice as many underground shoots/m of root occurred between 20 and 40 cm in fertilized plots as in unfertilized plots. However, no effect of nitrogen on the number of emerged root buds was detected. Nitrogen treatment increased shoot production only for those replanted root fragments from deeper than 60 cm in 1-yr-old stands and deeper than 160 cm in 2-yr-old stands.

Keywords

Canada thistleCirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRARRoot systemnitrogen fertilizationbud dormancyCIRAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4-5 , September 1990 , pp. 379 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bendall, G. M. 1975. The allelopathic activity of Californian thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] in Tasmania. Weed Res. 15:77–81.Google Scholar
2. Carson, A. G. 1974. Studies on competitive ability, seedling development, chemical control and translocation of dicamba and 2,4-D in Canada thistle. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Guelph. 96 pp.Google Scholar
3. Friesen, H. A. 1973. Glyphosate to control Canada thistle prior to seeding barley. Pages 376–377. Res. Rep., Canada Weed Committee, West. Sec. Calgary.Google Scholar
4. Friesen, H. A. 1975. Cultural and herbicide treatments for Canada thistle in barley. Pages 568–569. Res. Rep., Canada Weed Committee, West. Sec., Vancouver.Google Scholar
5. Hamdoun, A. M. 1970. The effects of different levels of nitrogen upon Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. plants grown from seeds and root fragments. Weed Res. 10:121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hoefer, R. H. 1981. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root bud initiation, biology, and translocation of carbon-14 labeled glyphosate as influenced by nitrogen, temperature, photoperiod and growth stage. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Nebraska. 72 pp.Google Scholar
7. Hunter, J. H. 1975. Chemical control of Canada thistle on fallow. Pages 572–573. Res. Rep., Canada Weed Committee, West. Sect., Vancouver.Google Scholar
8. Hunter, J. H. 1975. Fall applied glyphosate for control of Canada thistle. Pages 573–574. Res. Rep., Canada Weed Committee, West. Sect, Vancouver.Google Scholar
9. Hunter, J. H. 1985. A new way to control Canada thistle. Grainews, June. Pages 17–18.Google Scholar
10. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Seasonal variations in Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense) root bud growth and root carbohydrate reserves. Weed Sci. 33:44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on root bud development and assimilate translocation in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:148–152.Google Scholar
12. McIntyre, G. I. 1965. Some effects of the nitrogen supply on the growth and development of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 5:1–12.Google Scholar
13. McIntyre, G. I. 1972. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. The influence of nitrogen supply on the correlative inhibition of root bud activity. Can. J. Bot. 50:949–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. Evidence of competition for water as a factor in the mechanism of root bud inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 57:2572–2581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. McIntyre, G. I. and Hunter, J. H. 1975. Some effects of the nitrogen supply on growth and development of Cirsium arvense . Can. J. Bot. 53:3012–3021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Nadeau, L. B. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1989. The root system of Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Pavlychenko, T. K. 1943. Herbicidal action of chemicals on perennial weeds. Sci. Agric. 23:409–420.Google Scholar
18. Peterson, R. L. 1975. The initiation and development of root buds. Pages 125–161 in Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. T. eds. The Development and Functions of Roots. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
19. Regimbal, G. A., and Martin, A. R. 1985. Influence of growth regulators and nitrogen on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with picloram. Weed Sci. 33:109–113.Google Scholar
20. Rogers, C. F. 1929. Winter activity of the roots of perennial weeds. Science 69:299–300.Google Scholar
21. Tworkoski, T. J. and Sterrett, J. P. 1987. Modification of root bud growth in Canada thistle with selected plant growth regulators: Effects on translocation of glyphosate. J. Plant Growth Regul. 6:221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar