Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:44:15.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Temperature on Absorption and Translocation of Profluralin and Dinitramine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Hawxby
Affiliation:
School of Biol. Sci., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074
E. Basler
Affiliation:
School of Biol. Sci., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074

Abstract

The absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine] and 14C-dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘RS6–12′], barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.], soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Dare’], and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) were determined after treatment with 14C-labeled herbicides in nutrient solution for 24 hr at 16 or 38 C. 14C-profluralin accumulated in roots to a greater extent at 16 C, while metabolism was greatest at 38 C. Very little 14C-profluralin was translocated to the tops of plants. Conversely, 14C-dinitramine accumulated in the tops of plants to a greater extent at 38 C. Metabolism was not greatly affected by temperature. These effects may relate to excess toxicity of profluralin at 16 C and dinitramine at 38 C in species which normally exhibit resistance to the herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J.L. 1972. The influence of temperature and moisture on tomato and weed responses to trifluralin and isopropalin. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 25:2527.Google Scholar
2. Hacskaylo, J. and Amato, V.A. 1968. Effect of trifluralin on roots of corn and cotton. Weed Sci. 16:513515.Google Scholar
3. Hawxby, K., Basler, E., and Santelmann, P.W. 1972. Temperature effects on absorption and translocation of trifluralin and methazole in peanuts. Weed Sci. 20:285289.Google Scholar
4. Hill, L.V., Peeper, T., and Santelmann, P.W. 1968. Influence of soil temperature and moisture on peanut injury from amiben, trifluralin and vernolate. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 21:324.Google Scholar
5. Lignowski, E.M. and Scott, S. 1972. Effect of trifluralin on mitosis. Weed Sci. 17:556563.Google Scholar
6. Norton, J.A., Walter, J.P. Jr., and Storey, J.B. 1970. The effect of herbicides on lateral roots and nut quality of pecans. Weed Sci. 18:520522.Google Scholar
7. Penner, D. 1970. Temperature effects on corn and soybean root uptake of atrazine, linuron, and trifluralin. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. 25:72.Google Scholar
8. Penner, D. 1971. Effect of temperature on phytotoxicity and root uptake of several herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:571576.Google Scholar
9. Probst, G.W., Golab, T., Herberg, R.J., Holzer, F.J., Parka, S.J., van der Schans, C., and Tepe, J.B. 1968. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:592599.Google Scholar
10. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A.S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C-labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161191.Google Scholar