Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:50:31.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of reduced rates of quinclorac applied with propanil or propanil plus molinate in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted from 1994 through 1996 to evaluate barnyardgrass control, rice yield, and estimated economic return with postemergence applications of propanil or propanil plus molinate applied alone or with quinclorac. Herbicides were applied at rates of 3.4, 2.8 + 2.8, and 0.17 to 0.40 kg ai ha−1 for propanil, propanil plus molinate, and quinclorac, respectively. In most trials, combinations of propanil or propanil plus molinate applied with quinclorac provided greater barnyardgrass control, rice yields, and estimated economic returns than herbicides applied alone. Propanil or propanil plus molinate applied with quinclorac at 0.28 kg ha−1 was as effective as propanil or propanil plus molinate applied with quinclorac at 0.40 kg ha−1. Applying quinclorac at 0.17 kg ha−1 with propanil plus molinate was as effective as applying quinclorac at 0.28 or 0.40 kg ha−1 with these herbicides.

Keywords

Molinate, propanil, barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauvrice ‘Cypress.’Economic returnsweed managementECHCG
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 824 - 828
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L. 1995. A consolidated approach to weed management in rice (final report). Pages 32–37 in Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 446.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 8: 576–581.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Bauman, P. A. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75–147 in Bridges, D. C., ed. Crop Losses to Weeds in the United States—1992. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Giesler, G. and Heagler, A. 1994. Projected costs and returns—rice, Louisiana, 1994. Pages F-60–F-61 in Projected Costs and Returns and Cash Flows for Major Agricultural Enterprises Louisiana, 1994. Louisiana Agric. Experiment Stn. A. E. A. Information Ser. No. 117–124.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B. Jr., Helms, R. S., and Ashcraft, R. W. 1995. Weed control and crop tolerance of herbicides. Pages 38–46 in Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultral Experiment Station Research Ser. 446.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B. Jr., Helms, R. S., Beaty, J. D., Black, H. L., and Ashcraft, R. W. 1994. Reduced rate combinations of quinclorac with thiobencarb, propanil, and propanil plus molinate. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 25: 158–159.Google Scholar
Helms, R. S., Guy, C. B., Black, H. L., and Ashcraft, R. W. 1995. Weed management in rice. Pages 37–51 in Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 446.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. and Burns, A. 1996. Rice Weed Control Research in Northeast Louisiana, 1995. St. Joseph, LA: Louisiana Agriculrural Experiment Station Mimeo Series No. 115. 235 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1997. Efficacy of reduced rate herbicide programs in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) on alluvial clay soils. Weed Sci. 45: 151–157.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Burns, A. B., Barnes, C. J., Herrick, J. K., and Miller, D. K. 1997a. Barnyardgrass control with residual herbicide programs in dry-seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. In press.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Miller, D. K., Burns, A. B., Milligan, J. E., Wilson, C. F., and Lewis, C. 1997b. Rice Weed Control Research in Northeast Louisiana, 1996. St. Joseph, LA: Louisiana Agriculrural Experiment Station Mimeo Ser. 127. 245 p.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. and Street, J. E. 1984. Herbicide performance in rice (Oryza sativa) under three flooding conditions. Weed Sci. 32: 157–162.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U. S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol. 2: 232–241.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1990. Quinclorac combinations for weed control in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 43: 116.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Hill, J. E. 1990. Weed control technology in U. S. rice. Pages 314–327 in Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Copping, L. D., eds. Pest Management in Rice. United Kingdom: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in drill-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33: 686–692.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Allen, R. L. 1995. Postflood weed control in dry-seeded rice with quinclorac. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 32–33.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7: 600–604.Google Scholar