Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T06:26:12.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expression in Plants of a Bacterial Gene Coding for Glyphosate Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory A. Thompson ,
William R. Hiatt ,
Daniel Facciotti ,
David M. Stalker  and
Luca Comai
Gregory A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Each of the authors holds the title of Principal Scientist, Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA 95616
William R. Hiatt
Affiliation:
Each of the authors holds the title of Principal Scientist, Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA 95616
Daniel Facciotti
Affiliation:
Each of the authors holds the title of Principal Scientist, Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA 95616
David M. Stalker
Affiliation:
Each of the authors holds the title of Principal Scientist, Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA 95616
Luca Comai
Affiliation:
Each of the authors holds the title of Principal Scientist, Calgene, Inc., Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target site of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] inhibition in plants and bacteria is 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase. Our strategy for developing glyphosate-resistant crops has been to genetically engineer plants with a gene that codes for EPSP synthase with low sensitivity in glyphosate. We cloned such a gene from the aroA locus of a glyphosate-resistant mutagenized strain of Salmonella typhimurium. The enzyme encoded by this gene has a single amino acid change resulting in lower affinity for glyphosate and higher affinity for substrates than either plant or wild-type bacterial counterpart. A chimaeric gene containing the mutant aroA gene behind the octopine synthase promoter was constructed and integrated into Agrobacterium T-DNA vectors. Analysis of gall tissue from Brassica campestris L. (turnip rape) infected with A. tumefaciens K12 containing this chimaera showed mRNA and protein expressed from the bacterial gene; 50% of the total EPSP synthase activity present had kinetic properties of the mutant bacterial enzyme. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. ‘Xanthi′) plants have been regenerated from cocultivation with A. rhizogenes containing the same construct; analysis indicates expression of the gene and enhanced tolerance to glyphosate.

Keywords

Genetic engineeringherbicide5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthasearoAAgrobacteriumBrassicaNicotiana

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue S1: Genetic Engineering for Herbicide Resistance , 1987 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Amrhein, N., Johanning, D., Schab, J., and Schulz, A. 1983. Biochemical basis for glyphosate tolerance in a bacterium and a plant tissue culture. FEBS Lett. 157:191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bickel, H., Palme, L., and Schultz, G. 1978. Incorporation of shikimate and other precursors into aromatic amino acids and phenylquinones of isolated spinach chloroplasts. Phytochemistry 17:119–124.Google Scholar
3. Boocock, M. R. and Coggins, J. R. 1983. Kinetics of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase inhibition by glyphosate. FEBS Lett. 154:127–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Comai, L., Schilling-Cordaro, C., Mergia, A., and Houck, C. M. 1983. A new technique for genetic engineering of Agrobacterium Ti plasmid. Plasmid 10:21–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Comai, L., Sen, L. C., and Stalker, D. M. 1983. An altered aroA gene product confers resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. Science 221:370–371.Google Scholar
6. Comai, L., Facciotti, D., Hiatt, W. R., Thompson, G., Rose, R. E., and Stalker, D. M. 1985. Expression in plants of a mutant aroA gene from Salmonella typhimurium confers tolerance to glyphosate. Nature 317:741–744.Google Scholar
7. Gollub, E., Zalkin, H., and Sprinson, D. B. 1967. Correlation of genes and enzymes, and studies on relation of the aromatic pathway in Salmonella . J. Biol. Chem. 242:5323–5328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gresshoff, P. M. 1979. Growth inhibition of glyphosate and reversal of its action by phenylalanine and tyrosine. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6:177–185.Google Scholar
9. Hiatt, W. R., Comai, L., Huang, L. -J., Rose, R., Thompson, G., and Stalker, D. 1985. Introduction and expression in plants of a glyphosate resistant aroA gene isolated from Salmonella typhimurium . Pages 479–488 in Van Vloten-Doting, L., Groot, G.S.P., and Hall, T. C., eds. Molecular Form and Function of the Plant Genome. Plenum Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
10. Mousdale, D. M. and Coggins, J. R. 1984. Purification and properties of 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate 3-phosphate synthase from seedlings of Pisum sativum L. Planta 160:78–83.Google Scholar
11. Nafziger, E. D., Widholm, J. M., Steinrücken, H. C., and Killmer, J. L. 1984. Selection and characterization of a carrot cell line tolerant to glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 76:571–574.Google Scholar
12. Rubin, J. L., Gaines, C. G., and Jensen, R. 1984. Glyphosate inhibition of 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate 3-phosphate synthase from suspension-cultured cells of Nicotiana silvestris . Plant Physiol. 75:839–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Rogers, S. G., Brand, L. A., Holder, S. B., Sharp, E. S., and Brackin, M. M. 1983. Amplification of the aroA gene from E. coli results in tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:37–43.Google Scholar
14. Stalker, D. M., Hiatt, W. R., and Comai, L. 1985. A single amino acid substitution in the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase confers resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. J. Biol. Chem. 260:4724–4728.Google Scholar
15. Steinrücken, H. C. and Amrhein, N. 1983. 5-Enolpyruvyl-shikimate 3-phosphate synthase of Klebsiella pneumoniae. 2. Inhibition by glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine). Eur. J. Biochem. 143:351–357.Google Scholar