Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:26:23.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting Toxicity and Translocation of Metriflufen in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. D. Wills
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
P. M. Jordan
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

Toxicity of nonradiolabeled and translocation of 14C-labeled metriflufen3 {2-[4-(4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 213’) were evaluated under different environmental conditions as affected by surfactant and by the maturity of stem or leaf tissue at the place of herbicide application. Cotton was very tolerant to metriflufen, with the greatest tolerance at high temperatures. The herbicide entered the plant quite rapidly and autoradiographs indicated that radioactivity from the herbicide moved freely throughout the plant. Relative humidity (RH) between 40 and 100% had little effect on metriflufen toxicity. Two weeks after treatment with metriflufen at 0.5 kg/ha, cotton was essentially free of injury symptoms at 35 C, but injury was as great as 41 and 13% at 18 and 25 C, respectively. All plants recovered fully after 6 additional weeks in the greenhouse. When surfactant was added to the spray solutions, cotton injury was frequently increased during the first 2 weeks but not after 8 weeks. Accumulation of 14C at the site of 14C-metriflufen application was 31 to 65% after 48 h. Between 16 and 51% of the applied 14C moved from the treated area by translocation into other parts of the plant, or by volatilization into the atmosphere. Movement was greatest from stem tissue at 35 C and 100% RH. There was no correlation between 14C movement and herbicide toxicity within the plant. The selectivity of metriflufen to cotton probably results from deactivation by, or tolerance within, the plant rather than from differential absorption and translocation of the herbicide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. California Agric. Exp. Stn. and Ext. Serv. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
2. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. 1959. The absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled simazine by corn, cotton, and cucumber. Weeds 7:300309.Google Scholar
3. Downs, J. P. and Rieck, C. E. 1978. The evaluation of HOE-29152 for selective johnsongrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:53.Google Scholar
4. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon . Weed Sci. 25:448451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kells, J. J. and Rieck, C. E. 1978. Accumulation of 14C-glyphosate in johnsongrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:243.Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactant concentration on johnsongrass control with dalapon. Weeds 11:8386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of foliar sprays of diuron. Weeds 11:265269.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. 1979. The effect of surfactant and environment on the toxicity of metriflufen to soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 27:675679.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. 1981. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the translocation of 14C-metriflufen in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 29:8792.Google Scholar
10. McWhorter, C. G. and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Effects of adjuvants and environment on the toxicity of dalapon to johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 24:257260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Factors affecting dalapon absorption and translocation in johnsongrass. Physiol. Plant. 38:166170.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G. and Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting the translocation of 14C-mefluidide in soybeans (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense . Weed Sci. 26:382388.Google Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 26:605608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G., Jordan, T. N., and Wills, G. D. 1980. Translocation of 14C-glyphosate in soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense . Weed Sci. 28:113118.Google Scholar
15. Nalewaja, J. D., Rudelko, J., and Addmezewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23: 504507.Google Scholar
16. Prasad, R., Foy, C. L., and Crafts, A. S. 1967. Effect of relative humidity on absorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 15:149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rogers, N. and Oliver, L. R. 1978. Postemergence susceptibility of Gramineae species to HOE-29152 (metriflufen.). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:52.Google Scholar
18. Ross, M. A. 1978. Johnsongrass as a problem in Indiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:213.Google Scholar
19. Smith, L. W., Foy, C. L., and Bayer, D. E. 1967. Herbicidal enhancement by certain new biodegradable surfactants. Weeds 15:8789.Google Scholar
20. Wills, G. D. 1974. Effect of temperature, relative humidity, soil moisture and surfactant on the toxicity of glyphosate to cotton and purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 119.Google Scholar
21. Wills, G. D. 1976. Translocation of bentazon in soybeans and common cocklebur. Weed Sci. 24:536540.Google Scholar
22. Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting toxicity and translocation of glyphosate in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 26:509512.Google Scholar