Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:54:36.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fate of MBR-18337 in Soybean (Glycine max) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Plants and Cell Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Beth A. Swisher  and
Frederick T. Corbin
Beth A. Swisher
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-MBR-18337 {[N-[(4-ethylthio)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] methanesulfonamide]} in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] plants and cell cultures were studied. Sixty-five percent of the 14C recovered from soybean (65% of applied) was on or in the treated leaf, compared to 81% of the 14C recovered from johnsongrass (43% of applied). Translocation of the 14C from the treated leaf of soybean was greater than from the treated johnsongrass leaf, and was primarily to the apical leaves of both species. MBR-18337, its sulfoxide, sulfone, and an unidentified polar component(s) were isolated from intact plants and cell cultures of both species. Soybean plants and cells contained greater proportions of the polar component(s) than johnsongrass plants and cells.

Keywords

Herbicideplant growth regulatorstissue culture
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 1983 , pp. 242 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carringer, R. D., Rieck, C. E., and Bush, L. P. 1978. Metabolism of EPTC in corn. Weed Sci. 26:157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Casida, J. E., Kimmel, E. C., Ohkawa, H., Rodebush, J. E., Gray, R. A., Tseng, C. K., and Tilles, T. H. 1975. Thiocarbamate sulfoxide herbicides. Environ. Qual. Saf., Suppl. 3:675–679.Google Scholar
3. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burwood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gamborg, O. D., Miller, R. A., and Ojima, K. 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50:151–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1982. Metabolism of Herbicides in Higher Plants. Burgess Pub., Minneapolis, MN. 142.Google Scholar
6. Helms, R. L., Blackmon, W. J., and Reynolds, B. D. 1980. Comparisons of BAS-9052, KK-80, and MBR-18337 for the control of johnsongrass and annual grasses in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:55.Google Scholar
7. Martin, J. T. and Juniper, B. E. 1970. The Cuticles of Plants. St. Martins Press, New York. 347.Google Scholar
8. Metcalf, R. L., Fukuto, T. R., Collins, C., Borck, K., Burk, J., Reynolds, H. T., and Osman, M. F. 1966. Metabolism of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)-propionaldehyde-o-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime in plant and insect. J. Agric. Food Chem. 14:579–584.Google Scholar