Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:40:45.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Competition between Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomea hederacea) and Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald C. Cordes  and
Thomas T. Bauman
Ronald C. Cordes
Affiliation:
Dep. of Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Thomas T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Dep. of Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Detrimental effects on growth and yield of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 77′] from density and duration of competition by ivyleaf morningglory [Ipomea hederacea (L.) Jacq. ♯3 IPOHE] was evaluated in 1981 and 1982 near West Lafayette, IN. Ivyleaf morningglory was planted at densities of 1 plant per 90, 60, 30, and 15 cm of row in 1981 and 1 plant per 60, 30, 15, and 7.5 cm of row in 1982. Each density of ivyleaf morningglory competed for 22 to 46 days after emergence and the full season in 1981, and for 29 to 60 days after emergence and the full season in 1982. The best indicators of competition effects were leaf area index, plant dry weight, and yield of soybeans. Ivyleaf morningglory was more competitive during the reproductive stage of soybean growth. Photosynthetic irradiance and soil moisture measurements indicated that ivyleaf morningglory does not effectively compete for light or soil moisture. All densities of ivyleaf morningglory could compete with soybeans for 46 and 60 days after emergence in 1981 and 1982, respectively, without reducing soybean yield. Full-season competition from densities of 1 ivyleaf morningglory plant per 15 cm of row significantly reduced soybean yield by 36% in 1981 and 13% in 1982. The magnitude of soybean growth and yield reduction caused by a given density of ivyleaf morningglory was greater when warm, early season temperatures favored rapid weed development.

Keywords

IPOHE interferenceinterspecificdensitiestemperaturesoil moistureleaf area
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 364 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ambrose, L. G. and Coble, H. D. 1975. Fall panicum competition in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:36.Google Scholar
2. Borst, H. L. and Thatcher, L. E. 1931. Life history and composition of the soybean plant. Ohio Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 494. 96 pp.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. and Moomaw, R. S. 1977. Control of weeds in narrow row soybeans. Agron. J. 69:793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buttery, B. R. 1969. Effects of plant population and fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybeans. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49:659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Frazee, R. W. and Stoller, E. W. 1974. Differential growth of corn, soybeans, and seven dicotyledonous weed seedlings. Weed Sci. 22:336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. James, T. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Soil moisture competition between four morningglory species and cotton. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 30:363.Google Scholar
10. Johnston, T. J. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Contribution of leaves at different canopy levels to seed production of upright and lodged soybeans (Glycine max) . Crop Sci. 8:291–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Johnston, T. J., Pendleton, J. W., Peters, C. B., and Hicks, D. R. 1969. Influence of supplemental light on apparent photosynthesis, yield, and yield components of soybeans. Crop Sci. 9:577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Majors, D. J., Johnson, D. R., and Leudders, V. D. 1975. Evaluation of eleven thermal unit methods for predicting soybean development. Crop Sci. 27:172–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Nieto, J., Brando, M. A., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS 14:159–166.Google Scholar
15. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybeans. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1957. Competition relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.Google Scholar
17. Stern, W. R. and Donald, C. M. 1961. Relationship of radiation, leaf area index, and crop-growth rate. Nature 189:597–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar