Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:11:48.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Garden huckleberry (Solanum melanocerasium) germination, seed survival, and response to herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bo Tao
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China 150030
Edward L. Deckard
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Calvin G. Messersmith
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Garden huckleberry, a member of the Solanaceae family and a close relative of black nightshade, is an exotic plant introduced from Africa. Information on garden huckleberry response to a new environment and to herbicides is useful for determining the potential of this species to become an invasive weed, predicting the potential range of this species in the United States, and developing an optimum garden huckleberry management program. Germination and survival of garden huckleberry seed, as affected by environmental factors, were studied under greenhouse and controlled-environment growth chamber conditions. Garden huckleberry seed became viable between 2 and 3 wk after anthesis and was nondormant when separated from fresh berries. Garden huckleberry seed was not photoblastic and germinated equally well under both a 14-h photoperiod and continuous darkness. Seed germinated at constant temperatures from 17 to 35 C, with optimum germination between 22 and 30 C. Germination of garden huckleberry seed markedly declined as the osmotic potential of the germination medium decreased. The optimum pH for germination of garden huckleberry was between 5 and 9. Paraquat, dicamba, and bromoxynil provided excellent garden huckleberry control (95 to 100%); atrazine and glyphosate were more phytotoxic (90%) than imazamox (80%); and acifluorfen and foramsulfuron gave inadequate control.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, S. J. 1985. Eastern black nightshade—an increasing concern for soybean and forage producers. Crops Soils Mag 37/9:2931.Google Scholar
Axton, L. M. and Durgan, B. R. 1991. Plants poisonous to livestock. St. Paul, MN: Minn. Ext. Serv. Bull. AG-FO-5655.Google Scholar
Bithell, S. L., McKenzie, B. A., Bourdot, G. W., Hill, G. D., and Wratten, S. D. 2002. Germination requirements of laboratory stored seeds of black nightshade and hairy nightshade. Pages 222227 in Proceedings of the 55th Conference of the New Zealand Plant Protection. Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Protection Society, Inc.Google Scholar
Chachalis, D. and Reddy, K. N. 2000. Factors affecting Campsis radicans seed germination and seedling emergence. Weed Sci 48:212216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotser, M. P. and Witt, W. W. 2000. Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, G. max interference, and weed-free period on Solanum ptycanthum growth. Weed Sci 48:2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFelice, M. S. 2003. The black nightshades, Solanum nigrum L. et al.— poison, poultice, and pie. Weed Technol 17:421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focho, D. A., Fontem, D. A., Berinyuy, J. E., and Schippers, R. R. 2002. Morphological diversity of Solanum scabrum accessions in Cameroon. IPGRI Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl 131:4248.Google Scholar
[ISTA] International Seed Testing Association. 1985. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol 13:307513.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Reddy, K. N., and Poston, D. H. 2004. Factors affecting seed germination, seedling emergence, and survival of texasweed (Caperonia palustris). Weed Sci 52:989995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, B. E. 1983. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiol 72:6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci 32:327335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci 4:2558.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Singh, M. 1992. Germination and emergence of hairy beggarticks (Bidens pilosa). Weed Sci 40:195199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Lockett, P. M. 1978. Seed dormancy and field emergence in Solanum nigrum L. Weed Res 18:231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J. M. 1994. Huckleberry, garden—Solanum melanocerasium All. Fact sheet HS-613 of the series of horticultural science. Gainesville, FL: Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. E. and Witt, W. W. 1987. Germination of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata), smooth groundcherry (Physalis virginiana), and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci 35:5862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1982. The effects of some environmental conditions on the germination of black nightshade and ivyleaf morningglory. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 35:7682.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture Salinity Laboratory. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Westbrooks, R. D. 1991. Plant protection issues, I: a commentary on new weeds in the United States. Weed Technol 5:232237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Deckard, E. L., and Ahrens, W. H. 2005. Factors affecting germination of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) seeds. Weed Sci 53:4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar