Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:24:34.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination, emergence, and growth of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jason C. Fausey  and
Karen A. Renner
Jason C. Fausey
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Controlled environment experiments were completed to determine the effect of temperature on giant foxtail and fall panicum germination, emergence, and growth. Giant foxtail seed germination decreased when exposed to a constant 30 C compared to 20 C. Germination also decreased in the alternating 20/30 C temperature regime when the hours of exposure to 30 C as compared to 20 C increased. Fall panicum required alternating temperatures of 14 C (9 h)/28 C (15 h) to germinate. Giant foxtail seed germination exceeded 60% 4 d after exposure to an alternating temperature of 7 C (9.4 h)/20 C (14.6 h). Conversely, fall panicum seed did not germinate at the 7 C (9.4 h)/20 C (14.6 h) temperature regime and required a minimum of 7 d exposure to alternating temperatures of 13 C (8.7 h)/26 C (15.3 h) for 88% of the seed to germinate. The greatest emergence of giant foxtail and fall panicum was from 1 cm and 1 to 2.5 cm, respectively. Less than 5% of the giant foxtail and fall panicum seed emerged from 7.5 cm. The growth of giant foxtail seedlings was five times greater than that of fall panicum at each temperature regime tested. Incorporation of this information into bioeconomic models could result in accurate predictions of weed germination for effective weed management strategies.

Keywords

Giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFAfall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum PANDIAfter-ripeningdormancyemergencegerminationSETFAPANDI
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , June 1997 , pp. 423 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alex, J. F. 1980. Emergence from buried seed and germination of exhumed seed of fall panicum. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, L. G. and Coble, H. D. 1975. Fall panicum competition in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28: 36.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Duke, W. B. 1980. Dormancy, germination, and emergence characteristics of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum) seed. Weed Sci. 28: 683–685.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., and Williams, C. S. 1985. Interference and control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 203–208.Google Scholar
King, L. J. 1952. Germination and chemical control of the giant foxtail grass. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 16: 469–487.Google Scholar
Mester, T. C. and Buhler, D. D. 1986. Effects of tillage on the depth of giant foxtail germination and population densities. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 41: 4–5.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M. 1965. Effect of date of planting and stage of cutting on seed production of giant foxtail. Weeds 13: 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1980. Aspects of seed dormancy in fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum). Weed Sci. 28: 64–67.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. and Brown, M. M. 1977. Accelerated after-ripening for overcoming seed dormancy in grass weeds. Weed Sci. 25: 473–476.Google Scholar
Vengris, J. 1975. Field growth habits of fall panicum. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 29: 8.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. M. and Binning, L. K. 1987. Calculating the threshold temperature of development for weeds. Weed Sci. 35: 177–179.Google Scholar