Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:33:14.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glyphosate Absorption and Translocation in Rust-Infected Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Russell W. Wallace
Affiliation:
Dep. of Fruit and Vegetable Sci., 134 Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Robin R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Dep. of Fruit and Vegetable Sci., 134 Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327

Abstract

Puccinia coronata infection increased absorption of 14C-glyphosate in quackgrass 3 days after inoculation (DAI) when compared to 0,6,9, or 12 DAI. Days after inoculation had no effect on glyphosate translocation out of treated leaves until 9 to 12 DAI when 89% of the absorbed 14C-glyphosate was retained within the infected leaf. In contrast, only 43% was retained in leaves treated at 0 DAI. In other studies, 14C-glyphosate absorption increased linearly from 21 to 35% 12 to 96h after treatment (HAT). Differences between control and rust-infected plants were not significant. Sixty-three percent of absorbed 14C-glyphosate translocated out of control leaves by 96 HAT, while only 10% translocated out of rust-infected leaves. Additionally, 28 and 4% of the 14C absorbed was recovered from the rhizomes of control and rust-infected plants, respectively.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Ahmad, I., Farrar, J., and Whitbread, R. 1983. Photosynthesis and chloroplast functioning in leaves of barley infected with brown rust. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 23:411419.Google Scholar
2. Arjona-Berral, A., Mesa-Garcia, J., and Garcia-Torres, L. 1990. Distribution of 14C-glyphosate in legumes parasitised by Orobanche crenata . Weed Res. 30:5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bewick, T. A., Binning, L. K., and Balke, N. E. 1991. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate by carrot infected by swamp dodder. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116:10351039.Google Scholar
4. Berghaus, R. and Reisner, H. J. 1985. Changes in photosynthesis of wheat plants infected with wheat stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici). Phytopathol. Z. 112:165172.Google Scholar
5. Boodley, J. W. and Sheldrake, R. Jr. 1977. Cornell Peat-Lite Mixes for Commercial Plant Growing. Info. Bul. No. 43, New York State Col. Agric. Life Sci., Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY 14853, 8 p.Google Scholar
6. Bushnell, W. R. 1984. Structural and physiological changes in susceptible host tissue. Page 477507 in The Cereal Rusts. Vol. 1. Origins, Specificity, Structure and Physiology. Academic Press.Google Scholar
7. Callaway, M. B., Phatak, S. C., and Wells, H. D. 1988. Interactions of Puccinia canaliculata (Schw.) Lagerh. with herbicides on tuber production and growth of Cyperus esculentus L. Trop. Pest Mngt. 33:2226.Google Scholar
8. Caseley, J. C. and Coupland, D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. Pages 92123 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworths and Co., London.Google Scholar
9. Durbin, R. D. 1984. Effects of rust on plant development in relation to the translocation of inorganic and organic solutes. Pages 509528 in Bushnell, W. R. and Roelfs, A. P., eds. The Cereal Rusts, Vol. I. Origins, Specificity, Structure and Physiology. Academic Press, Inc. Google Scholar
10. Hodgson, R. H., Wymore, L. A., Watson, A. K., Snyder, R. H., and Collete, A. 1988. Efficacy of Colletotrichum coccodes and thidiazuron for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:473480.Google Scholar
11. Klevorn, T. B. and Wyse, D. L. 1984. Effect of leaf girdling and rhizome girdling on glyphosate and photoassimilate distribution in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 32:402407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Levesque, C. A., Rahe, J. E., and Eaves, D. M. 1992. The effect of soil heat treatment and microflora on efficacy of glyphosate in seedlings. Weed Res. 32:363374.Google Scholar
13. Livne, A. 1964. Photosynthesis in healthy and rust-affected plants. Plant Physiol. 39:614621.Google Scholar
14. Majek, B. A. 1980. The effect of environmental factors on quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) growth and glyphosate penetration and translocation. Ph.D Dis., Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY. 59 pages.Google Scholar
15. Owera, S. A. P., Farrar, J. F., and Whitbread, R. 1983. Translocation from leaves of barley infected with brown rust. New Phytol. 94:111123.Google Scholar
16. Sampson, M. G. and Watson, A. K. 1985. Host range of Puccinia coronata, Puccinia graminis, and Puccinia recondita isolates from Agropyron repens . Can. J. Plant Pathol. 7:417420.Google Scholar
17. Scheepens, P. C. 1987. Joint action of Cochliobolus lunatus and atrazine on Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 27:4347.Google Scholar
18. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.Google Scholar
19. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Translocation of glyphosate and quizalofop and metabolism of quizalofop in quackgrass biotypes (Elytrigia repens). Weed Technol. 5:525531.Google Scholar
20. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1993. Rust-infected quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) growth and rhizome bud death after glyphosate treatment. Weed Sci. 41:501507.Google Scholar
21. Westra, P. H., Wyse, D. L., and Cook, E. F. 1981. Weevil (Notaris bimaculatus) feeding reduces effectiveness of glyphosate on quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 29:540547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Whipps, J. M. and Lewis, D. H. 1981. Patterns of translocation, storage and interconversion of carbohydrates. Pages 4783 in Ayres, G., ed. The Effects of Disease on the Physiology of the Growing Plant. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar