Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:15:12.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate or sethoxydim for quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in two tillage regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Neil Harker  and
William H. Vanden Born
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research Centre, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, and Nutrition Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Lacombe and Ellerslie, Alberta, Canada, to study the interaction of tillage with glyphosate and sethoxydim on quackgrass shoot and rhizome biomass, rhizome bud viability, and crop yield. Glyphosate was most effective in the conventional tillage regime, whereas sethoxydim was effective only in conventional tillage. Tillage reduced viable rhizome buds more than shoot or rhizome biomass. The large tillage effect on quackgrass control with either herbicide would likely be diminished in zero tillage systems that employ preseeding burn-off or preharvest application of glyphosate. Under zero and conventional tillage, glyphosate at 220 g ha−1 often was as effective as glyphosate at 880 g ha−1.A split application of glyphosate at 220 g ha−1 in the fall and spring was as effective as a single 880 g ha−1 treatment in conventional tillage, and sometimes more effective than 880 g ha−1 in zero tillage. Glyphosate followed by sethoxydim was usually no better than glyphosate alone. Short-term split applications of sethoxydim offered no consistent advantage over single applications.

Keywords

Glyphosatesethoxydimquackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevskibarley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Leduc’canola, Brassica rapa L. ‘Tobin.’Bud viabilitylow herbicide ratesrhizomeszero tillageAGRRE
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 812 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alberta Agriculture. 1996. Poast. Pages 163–166 in Ali, S., ed. Crop Protection With Chemicals: Herbicides, Insecticides, Fungicides, Rodenticides. Ellerslie, Alberta, Canada: Agdex 606-1.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. 1972. Quackgrass control with glyphosate. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27: 54.Google Scholar
Brockman, F. E., Duke, W. B., and Hunt, J. F. 1973. Agronomic factors influencing the effectiveness of glyphosate for quackgrass control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 27: 21–29.Google Scholar
Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24: 149–152.Google Scholar
Dunham, R. S., Buchholtz, K. P., Derscheid, L. A., Grisby, A. H., Helgerson, E. A., and Staniforth, D. W. 1956. Quackgrass Control. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 434. 31 p.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. 1995. Short-term split application effects of grass-specific herbicides on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) under field conditions. Weed Technol. 9: 710–715.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Temperature effects on translocation patterns of several herbicides within quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 36: 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K.N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1993. Herbicide comparisons on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) within different crop competition and tillage conditions. Weed Sci. 41: 94–99.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Taylor, J. S. 1994. Chlormequat chloride (CCC) pre-treatments may enhance quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control with sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 8: 499–507.Google Scholar
Hicks, C. P. and Jordan, T. N. 1984. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), and wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) to postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32: 835–841.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 29: 382–386.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. G. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1962. The natural dormancy of vegetative buds on the rhizomes of quackgrass. Weeds 10: 53–57.Google Scholar
Kigel, J. and Koller, D. 1985. Asexual reproduction of weeds. Pages 65–100 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume 1: Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Leakey, R.R.B. and Chancellor, R. J. 1975. Parental factors in dominance of lateral buds on rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Planta 123: 267–274.Google Scholar
Lowe, P. F. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1951. Cultural methods for control of quackgrass. Weeds 1: 346–351.Google Scholar
McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens . Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 49: 99–109.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T. 1991. Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) interference in canola (Brassica campestris). Weed Sci. 39: 397–401.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W., Taylor, J. S., Robertson, J. M., Harker, K. N., and Daly, E. J. 1995. Changes in abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in axillary buds of Elytrigia repens released from apical dominance. Physiol. Plant. 94: 110–116.Google Scholar
Rioux, R. 1982. Measuring quackgrass interference in barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62: 183–188.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Harker, K. N., Pocock, R. N., and Yeung, E. 1989. Apical dominance in the rhizome of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens): inhibitory effect of the scale leaves. Weed Sci. 37: 680–687.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence applications of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34: 664–668.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S., Robertson, J. M., Harker, K. N., Bhalla, M. K., Daly, E. J., and Pearce, D. W. 1995. Apical dominance in rhizomes of quackgrass, Elytrigia repens: the effect of auxin, cytokinins and abscisic acid. Can J. Bot. 73: 307–314.Google Scholar
Young, F. L. and Wyse, D. L. 1980. Control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) in soybeans (Glycine max) with HOE 29152. Weed Sci. 28:493–498.Google Scholar