Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:51:39.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Responses in Sorghum and Wheat Induced by Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J.R. Baur ,
R.W. Bovey  and
J.A. Veech
J.R. Baur
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., College Station, TX 77843
R.W. Bovey
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., College Station, TX 77843
J.A. Veech
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Foliar application of 2.8 μg/plant of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] to greenhouse grown sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Tophand’] seedlings resulted in increased fresh weight. As glyphosate levels were increased to 11.2 μg/plant, diameter of the basal growth zone increased while fresh weight decreased. In growth chamber studies with sorghum and wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) ‘Era’] seedlings, glyphosate caused the greatest reduction in fresh weight at the optimum growth temperatures for both species. Glyphosate inhibited normal production of basal buds in wheat at the optimum growth temperature and stimulated bud production at temperatures above the optimum. Under normal growth conditions, basal buds in sorghum do not develop; however, application of glyphosate stimulated basal bud development under normal and above-normal temperature conditions. Histochemical analysis of malate dehydrogenase activity in apical meristem tissue of treated sorghum seedlings indicated that growth of the apex was normal and viable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 1977 , pp. 238 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baur, J.R. and Bovey, R.W. 1975. Herbicidal effects of tebuthiuron and glyphosate. Agron. J. 67:547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Caseley, J.C. 1972. The effect of environmental factors on the performance of glyphosate against Agropyron repens . Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 11:641–647.Google Scholar
3. Coupland, D. and Caseley, J.C. 1975. Reduction of silica and increase in tillering induced in Agropyron repens by glyphosate. J. Exp. Bot. 26:138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jaworski, E. 1972. Mode of action of N-phosphonomethylglycine: Inhibition of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20:1195–1198.Google Scholar
5. Klosterboer, A.D. 1974. Phytotoxicity of glyphosate, MSMA, and paraquat to bearing citrus. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:166–169.Google Scholar
6. Rom, R.C., Brown, S.A., and Markham, J.D. 1974. Glyphosate toxicity to apple trees. Hortic. Sci. 9:594–595.Google Scholar
7. Thimann, K.V. 1937. On the nature of inhibitions caused by auxin. Am. J. Bot. 24:407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Upchurch, R.P. and Baird, D.D. 1972. Herbicidal action of MON-0573 as influenced by light and soil. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 25:41–44.Google Scholar
9. Williams, G.H. and Foley, A. 1975. Effect of herbicides on bracken rhizome survival. Ann. Appl. Biol. 79:109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar