Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:42:07.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide and Cultural Practices in Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. Mislevy ,
W. L. Curry  and
B. J. Brecke
P. Mislevy
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Center, Ona, FL 33865
W. L. Curry
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
B. J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Center, Jay, FL 32565
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) was applied at 3.3 kg/ha during late May or early June to a well-established grass sward consisting of smutgrass [Sporobolus poiretii (R.&S.) Hitchc], pangolagrass (Digitaria decumbens Stent.), and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge. ‘Pensacola’). Two cultural treatments, mowing or roller chopping, and two fertilizer treatments, 0 or N-P-K at 112-25-93 kg/ha were superimposed on the dalapon treatments at four different time intervals in a split plot design. Chopping or mowing 2 weeks after the dalapon treatment resulted in the highest bahiagrass ground cover and smutgrass control with a minimum amount of bare soil. Chopping tended to favor pangolagrass recovery, and mowing favored bahiagrass recovery. Fertilizer application increased pangolagrass ground cover 90-days after treatment, and smutgrass control after 1 yr. Fertilizer application 6 weeks after dalapon treatment generally increased pangolagrass ground cover and smutgrass control. Pangolagrass responded to fertilizer regardless of chopping or mowing. Mowing controlled more smutgrass than did chopping on the non-fertilized plots.

Keywords

Pasture weed controlweed grassesPangolagrass Digitaria decumbensbahiagrass Paspalum notatum
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 1980 , pp. 585 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chew, V. 1976. Comparison of treatment means: a compendium. Hort. Sci. 11:348–357.Google Scholar
2. Currey, W. L. and Mislevy, P. 1974. Smutgrass control in Florida. Down Earth, 29:6–9.Google Scholar
3. Hitchcock, A. A. 1950. Manual of Grasses of the United States. 2nd Edition. USDA Misc. Publ. 200. 1051 pp.Google Scholar
4. McCaleb, J. E., Hodges, E. M., and Kirk, G. W. 1966. Smutgrass control. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. S-149, 10 pp.Google Scholar
5. Mislevy, P. and Currey, W. L. 1980. Smutgrass control in Florida. Weed Sci. 28:316–320.Google Scholar
6. Petersen, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar