Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:18:54.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide efficacy, leaf structure, and spray droplet contact angle among Ipomoea species and smallflower morningglory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Demosthenis Chachalis ,
Krishna N. Reddy ,
C. Dennis Elmore  and
Marcus L. Steele
Demosthenis Chachalis
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
C. Dennis Elmore
Affiliation:
Application and Production Technology Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 36, Stoneville, MS 38776
Marcus L. Steele
Affiliation:
Delta State University, Department of Physical Sciences, P.O. Box 3255, Cleveland, MS 38733
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate responses of ivyleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, palmleaf morningglory, and smallflower morningglory to several herbicides in relation to leaf structure, epicuticular wax, and spray droplet behavior. Two- to four-leaf stage plants of each species were highly susceptible to acifluorfen, bentazon, bromoxynil, glufosinate, and glyphosate. However, at the five- to eight-leaf stage, these species were less susceptible, and control was herbicide specific. Spray droplets of these five herbicides had a higher contact angle on ivyleaf morningglory than the other three species with a few exceptions. Stomata and glands were present on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of all species, and palmleaf morningglory and smallflower morningglory had more of these than did the other two species. Trichomes were present on all species except palmleaf morningglory. Epicuticular wax mass was highest in ivyleaf morningglory (57 μg cm−2) and lowest in smallflower morningglory (14 μg cm−2). Wax consisted of homologous short-chain (< C18) or long-chain (> C20) hydrocarbons, alcohols, acids, and triterpenes. Smallflower morningglory waxes lacked short-chain length components. Triterpenes were absent in palmleaf morningglory and smallflower morningglory epicuticular waxes. Untriacontane (C31 hydrocarbon) and tridecanol (C30 alcohol) were common major long-chain components in waxes of all four species. Heptadecane (C17 hydrocarbon) and octanoic acid (C18) were common major short-chain length wax components in pitted, ivyleaf, and palmleaf morningglory. In spite of some differences in leaf surface structures, wax mass, and wax components among the four species, there was no clear relationship between these parameters and herbicide efficacy.

Keywords

Acifluorfenbentazonbromoxynilglufosinateglyphosateivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHEpalmleaf morningglory, Ipomoea wrightii Gray IPOWRpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLAsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb. IAQTASpray droplet spread area
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 628 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Jaff, D.M.A., Cook, G. T., Carr, K. E., and Duncan, H. J. 1982. Further studies on bracken morphology in relation to herbicide uptake. Pages 293–301 In Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. The Plant Cuticle. Linnean Society Symposium Series 10. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Crop Protection Reference. 16th ed. New York: C and P Press.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. A. 1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes. Pages 139–166 In Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. The Plant Cuticle. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1984. Control of annual morningglories (Ipomoea spp.) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, B. R., Tulloch, A. P., and Bailey, L. G. 1989. Epicuticular waxes of the genus Hordeum: a survey of their chemical composition and ultrastructure. Can. J. Bot. 67:3219–3226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, D. H. and Burt, K. M. 1970. Foliar permeability among twenty species of the Bromeliaceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 97:269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chachalis, D., Reddy, K. N., and Elmore, C. D. 2001. Characterization of leaf surface, wax composition, and control of redvine and trumpet-creeper with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 49:156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 51:299–313.Google Scholar
Eastman, D. G. and Coble, H. D. 1977. Differences in the control of five morningglory species by selected soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 30:39–45.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Hurst, H. R., and Austin, D. F. 1990. Biology and control of morningglories (Ipomoea spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 5:83–114.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. and Paul, R. N. 1998. Leaf surface micromorphology of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and adjuvant response. Proc. Adjuv. Agrochem. Challeng. Opportun. I:43–48.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Tonos, J., and Steele, M. 1998. Epicuticular wax composition of soybean leaves differing in pubescence. Proc. Adjuv. Agrochem. Challeng. Opportun. I:49–54.Google Scholar
Ferreira, J.F.S. and Reddy, K. N. 2000. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in Erythroxylum coca and E. novogranatense . Weed Sci. 48:193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gülz, P G., Prasad, R.B.N., and Müller, E. 1992. Surface structures and chemical composition of epicuticular waxes during leaf development of Fagus sylvatica L. Naturforsch. 47:190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harr, J., Guggenheim, R., Schulke, G., and Falk, R. H. 1991. The leaf surface of major weeds. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 11 p.Google Scholar
Hemmers, H. and Gülz, P. G. 1986. Epicuticular waxes from leaves of five Euphorbia species. Phytochemistry 25:2103–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, F. D. 1985. Herbicide absorption and translocation and their relationship to plant tolerances and susceptibility. Pages 191–214 In Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume II. Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D., Bayer, D. E., and Falk, R. H. 1974. Herbicide dispersal patterns: I. As a function of leaf surface. Weed Sci. 22:394–401.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1973. Lipid deposition on leaves of Canada thistle ecotypes. Weed Sci. 21:169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci. 1:156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stoltenberg, G. E. 1982. Actions of adjuvant on plant surfaces. Pages 26–67 In Adjuvants for Herbicides. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. M., Holloway, P. J., and Baker, E. A. 1976. Ultrastructure and chemistry of Clarkia elegans leaf wax: a comparative study with Brassica leaf waxes. Plant Sci. Lett. 6:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchersid, M. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1995. Systems for morningglory (Ipomoea sp.) control in BXN cotton. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 48:42–43.Google Scholar
Kitson, F. G., Larsen, B. S., and McEwen, C. N. 1996. Quantitative GC/MS. Pages 35–41 In Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: A Practical Guide. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., Matthews, J. L., Baldwin, J. L., and Maschoff, J. 1999. Evaluation of glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays) and glufosinate: efficacy on annual weeds. Weed Technol. 13:691–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1980. Control of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 28:409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeux, H. S. Jr. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1990. Composition of epicuticular wax on Prosopsis glandulosa leaves. Bot. Gaz. 151:240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1985. The physiological effects of adjuvants on plants. Pages 141–158 In Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume II. Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. Epicuticular wax on Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Sci. 41:475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E. W., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 2000. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with CGA-277476 and four postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 14:617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Hatzios, K. K., and Hagood, E. S. 2000. Weed and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max) response to glufosinate and glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Technol. 14:667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar