Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:53:22.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon in California Oryza sativa fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Albert J. Fischer ,
Comfort M. Ateh ,
David E. Bayer  and
James E. Hill
Comfort M. Ateh
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616
David E. Bayer
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616
James E. Hill
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Range Science Department, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon have become the most serious weeds in California Oryza sativa since continuous flooding was used to suppress E. crus-galli. Continuous use of a limited number of available graminicides and an increasing number of control failures led to the investigation of herbicide resistance in E. oryzoides and E. phyllopogon. Greenhouse dose-response studies with postemergence (POST) applications of molinate, thiobencarb, fenoxaprop-ethyl, and bispyribac-sodium estimating GR50 (herbicide dose to inhibit growth by 50%) values suggested resistance to all herbicides in two E. phyllopogon accessions and to molinate and thiobencarb in one E. oryzoides accession when compared with susceptible E. phyllopogon and E. oryzoides controls, respectively. No resistance was detected in dose-response studies with propanil. Minimum and maximum ratios (R/S) of the GR50 values of resistant to susceptible E. phyllopogon plants (in two experiments involving two resistant accessions) were 7.8 and >13.3 for thiobencarb, 2.2 and 4.3 for molinate, 16.5 and 428.7 for fenoxaprop-ethyl, and 2.0 and 12.0 for bispyribac-sodium. Minimum and maximum E. oryzoides R/S ratios (average of two experiments) were 21.9 and 4.6 for thiobencarb and molinate, respectively. A resistant E. phyllopogon (one accession tested) and the susceptible control were killed by POST applications of glyphosate, glufosinate, and clomazone, and by a preemergence application of pendimethalin. Thus, the repeated use of the few available grass herbicides in the predominantly monocultured O. sativa of California has selected for herbicide resistance in E. oryzoides and E. phyllopogon. The introduction of herbicides with new mechanisms of action will be useful to manage herbicide-resistant E. oryzoides and E. phyllopogon. However, cross- and multiple resistance emphasize the need to integrate herbicide use with nonchemical means of weed management.

Keywords

Bispyribac-sodium, sodium 2,6-bis[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)oxy]benzoateclomazonefenoxaprop-ethylglyphosateglufosinatemolinatependimethalinpropanilthiobencarbEchinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch ECHOR, early watergrassEchinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss ECHPH, late watergrassEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. var. crus-galli ECHCG, barnyardgrassOryza sativa L., riceDose-response bioassaygraminicidesherbicide resistancecross-resistancemultiple resistanceECHORECHPHECHCG
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adair, C. R., and Engler, K. 1955. The irrigation and culture of rice. Pages 389–394 In U.S. Department of Agriculture, ed. Water. USDA Yearbook of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 8:576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, D. E., Hill, J. E., and Seaman, D. E. 1985. Rice (Oryza sativa). Pages 262–268 In Principles of Weed Control in California. Fresno, CA: California Weed Conf.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 441 p.Google Scholar
Dunshee, C. W. 1923. Results of Rice Experiments in 1922. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 354:401–405.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Granados, E., and Trujillo, D. 1993. Propanil tolerance in populations of junglerice. Weed Sci. 41:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Ramirez, H. V., and Lozano, J. 1997. Suppression of junglerice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link] by irrigated rice cultivars in Latin America. Agron. J. 89:516–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. J. and Hill, J. E. 1998. Weed control in rice. Pages 54–84 In Annual Report Comprehensive Rice Research. Davis, CA: University of California-Davis and USDA.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Hill, J. E., Williams, J. F., Anstey, J., Jahnes, K. M., and Ateh, C. 1999. Herbicide-resistant watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss) in rice in California. WSSA Abstracts 39:319.Google Scholar
Garita, I., Valverde, B. E., Chacon, I. A., de la Cruz, R., Riches, C. R., and Caseley, J. C. 1995. Occurrence of propanil resistance in Echinochloa colona in Central America. Pages 193–196 In Proceedings of the Crop Protection Conference. Brighton, UK: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Garro, J. E., de la Cruz, R., and Shannon, P. J. 1991. Propanil tolerance in Echinochloa colona populations with different herbicide use histories. Pages 1079–1038 In Proceedings of the Crop Protection Conference. Brighton, UK: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Giannopolitis, C. N. and Vassiliou, G. 1989. Propanil tolerance in Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Tropical Pest Manage. 35:6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, F. W., Ali, M. A., and Fairbrothers, D. E. 1972. A Revision of Echinochloa in the United States. Am. Midland Natur. 87:36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: The outlook for the future. Pages 325–347 In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W. 1991. Lipid biosynthesis inhibitors. Weed Sci. 39:435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1997. The occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide. Pestic. Sci. 51:235–243.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. E., Carriere, M. D., Cook, J. F., Butler, T. D., Lana, P. J., and Hare, J. 1994. Londax resistance management strategies for California rice. Pages 180–185 In Proceedings of the California Weed Conference, v. 46. Freemont, CA: California Weed Conference.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E., Le Strange, M. L., Bayer, D. E., and Williams, J. F. 1985. Integrated weed management in California. Pages 100–104 In Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science, v. 38. Reno, NV: WSWS.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1993. Mechanisms and agronomic aspects of herbicide resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, B-Q. and Gressel, J. 1997. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) resistance to both butachlor and thiobencarb in China. Resistance Pest Management 9:5–7.Google Scholar
Jutsum, A. R. and Graham, J. C. 1995. Managing weed resistance: The role of the agrochemical industry. Pages 557–566 In Proceedings of the Crop Protection Conference. Brighton, UK: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Michael, P. W. 1983. Taxonomy and distribution of Echinochloa species with special reference to their occurrence as weeds of rice. Pages 291–306 In Proceedings of the Conference on Weed Control in Rice. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Miller, M. D. 1979. Evolution of California rice culture. Pages 79–133 In Willson, J. H., ed. Rice in California. Butte Co. Richvale, CA: Rice Growers Association.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. and Mathews, J. A. 1992. Multiple herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidium): A driving force for the adoption of integrated weed management. Pages 75–87 In Denholm, I., Devonshire, A. L., and Hollomon, D. W., eds. Resistance ‘91: Achievements and Development in Combating Pesticide Resistance (1991: Rothamsted Experimental Station). London, UK: Society of Chemical Industry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidium) in Australia. Weed Sci. 46:604–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, C. R., Caseley, J. C., Valverde, B. E., and Down, V. M. 1996. Resistance of Echinochloa colona (L.) link to ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Page 42 In International Symposium on Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Cordoba, Spain: Spanish Weed Science Society and European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S., Gealy, D., Brewster, B. D., and Fuerst, E. P. 1994. Cross-resistance of several diclofop-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Weed Sci. 42:430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr., Talbert, R. E., and Baltazar, A. M. 1992. Control, biology and ecology of propanil-tolerant barnyardgrass. Pages 46–50 In Arkansas Rice Research Studies. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose response curves and statistical models. Pages 30–55 In Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Vickery, J. W. 1975. Flora of New South Wales. No. 19. Gramineae. Part 2:189–211.Google Scholar
Yabuno, T. 1984. A Biosynthetic Study on Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch. Cytologia 49:673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar