Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:10:31.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides Applied to Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) after Attachment to Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Dawson  and
A. R. Saghir
J. H. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res.Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
A. R. Saghir
Affiliation:
American Univ. of Beirut, Lebanon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] at 0.075 kg/ha, DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate) at 10 kg/ha, and H 26905 [O-ethyl-O-(3-methyl-6-nitrophenyl)-N-sec-butyl phosphorothioamidate] at 0.25 and 0.5 kg/ha were sprayed on foliage of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. ‘Vernal’) on which field dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) and largeseed dodder (Cuscuta indecora Choisy) were attached and growing vigorously, almost all visible dodder tissue was killed and alfalfa was not injured noticeably. Some dodder recovered from haustoria within the alfalfa stems and from remnants of twined tendrils, but devastation of the alfalfa by uncontrolled dodder was prevented. PP 009 (butyl 2-[4-(5-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyloxy)phenoxy] propionate), BAS 9052 (2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one) and RO 13-8895 (acetone-O-[D-2-[p-[(α,α,α-trifluoro-p-tolyl)-oxy] phenoxy] propionyl] oxime) at 0.25, 0.50, or 1.0 kg/ha did not control dodder.

Keywords

BAS 9052DCPAPP 009glyphosateH-26905RO 13-8895
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , July 1983 , pp. 465 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dawson, J. H. 1966. Factors affecting dodder control with granular CIPC. Weeds 14:255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1967. Soil-applied herbicides for dodder control: initial greenhouse evaluation. Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 691. 7.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1970. Dodder control in alfalfa with dichlobenil. Weed Sci. 18:225–230.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1971. Establishing alfalfa on dodder-infested soil. Weed Sci. 19:222–225.Google Scholar
5. Dawson, J. H. 1971. Dodder control in alfalfa with dinoseb and D (–) (3-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2N-isopropyl-propionamide. Weed Sci. 19:551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dawson, J. H. 1978. Control of dodder (Cuscuta spp.) with pronamide. Weed Sci. 26:660–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dawson, J. H. 1979. Control of dodder (Cuscuta spp.) in alfalfa with chlorpropham. Proc. Second Symp. Parasitic Weeds, Raleigh, NC. pp. 245–253.Google Scholar
8. Lee, W. O. and Timmons, F. L. 1956. Evaluation of pre-emergence and stubble treatments for control of dodder in alfalfa seed crops. Agron. J. 48:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Saghir, A. R. and Dastgheib, F. 1978. A review on the biology and control of Orobanche . Proc. Workshop on Food Legume Improvement and Development, ICARDA, Aleppo. pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
10. Saghir, A. R. 1979. Different chemicals and their potential for Orobanche control. Proc. Second Symp. Parasitic Weeds, Raleigh, NC. pp. 41–47.Google Scholar
11. Torell, Paul J. 1968. Ten treatments for controlling dodder in alfalfa seed fields. Univ. of Idaho, Coll. of Agric. Curr. Inf. Ser. No. 75, 4.Google Scholar