Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:09:12.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Tall Fescue Grass and Carduus Thistle Weevils on the Growth and Development of Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Loke T. Kok ,
Thomas J. McAvoy  and
Warren T. Mays
Loke T. Kok
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Thomas J. McAvoy
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Warren T. Mays
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field plot experiments were conducted to examine the interactions between tall fescue grass (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), musk thistle (Carduus nutans L. = thoermeri Weinmann # CRUNU), and two thistle weevils Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) and Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich. Restriction of musk thistle growth was greatest when the weevils were allowed to feed on the musk thistles competing with tall fescue. Significant reductions were found in total musk thistle seeds per plant, root weight, flower buds per plant, stem dry weight, seeds per head, root crown diameter, stem height, rosette diameter, and head diameter. Seed weight and viability were not reduced. Of the three stress factors (tall fescue and the two Carduus thistle weevils), tall fescue had the greatest impact. When musk thistle seeds were planted in 1-yr-old tall fescue, germination was low. Seeds that germinated did not grow more than four Leaves and none of the thistles developed to the reproductive stage. A 1-year-old tall fescue stand effectively prevented musk thistle reproduction. Thus, tall fescue helped suppress musk thistle growth more quickly than the use of Carduus thistle weevils alone without competitive vegetation. Dry weight of tall fescue grass was lower in musk thistle-infested plots than in the thistle-free plots.

Keywords

Biological weed controlFestuca arundinaceaTrichosirocalus horridusRhinocyllus conicusCRUNU
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 1986 , pp. 966 - 971
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res. 15:407–411.Google Scholar
2. Cartwright, B. and Kok, L. T. 1985. Growth responses of musk and plumeless thistles (Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides) to damage by Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Weed Sci. 33:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Feldman, I., McCarty, M. K., and Scifres, C. J. 1968. Ecological and control studies of musk thistle. Weed Sci. 16:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kok, L. T. 1981. Status of two European weevils for the biological control of Carduus thistles in the U.S.A. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 16:139–142.Google Scholar
5. Kok, L. T. 1986. Impact of Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Carduus thistles in pastures. Crop Prot. (In press).Google Scholar
6. Kok, L. T. and Surles, W. W. 1975. Successful biocontrol of musk thistle by an introduced weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus . Environ. Entomol. 4:1025–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lentner, M. and Bishop, T. 1986. Experimental Design and Analysis. Valley Book Co., Blacksburg, VA. (In press).Google Scholar
8. Reece, P. E. and Wilson, R. G. 1983. Effect of Canada thistle (C. arvense) and musk thistle (C. nutans) control on grass herbage. Weed Sci. 11:488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Rees, N. E. 1977. Impact of Rhinocyllus conicus on thistles in Southwestern Montana. Environ. Entomol. 6:839–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Schreiber, M. M. 1967. Effect of density and control of Canada thistle on production and utilization of alfalfa pasture. Weeds 15:138–142.Google Scholar
11. Sieburth, P. J., Kok, L. T., and Lentner, M. 1983. Factors influencing the effectiveness of Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) in the control of Carduus thistles. Crop Prot. 2:143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Surles, W. W. and Kok, L. T. 1978. Carduus thistle seed destruction by Rhinocyllus conicus . Weed Sci. 26:264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Thrasher, F. P., Cooper, C. S., and Hodgson, J. M. 1963. Competition of forage species with Canada thistle, as affected by irrigation and nitrogen levels. Weeds 11:136–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Trumble, J. T. and Kok, L. T. 1979. Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Life cycle and development on Carduus thistles in Virginia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 563–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P. 1984. Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel.) (Col., Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. Z. Angew. Entomol. 97:36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar