Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:08:50.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Soybean (Glycine Max) Tolerance to AC 263,222 by Limiting Terminal Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry J. Newsom  and
David R. Shaw
Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were established to evaluate the effects of various band widths left open directly over the soybean row to improve soybean tolerance to AC 263,222 and chlorimuron applied POST, while maintaining weed control. Drop tubes with even fan tips extended below the spray boom to within 40 and 30 cm from the ground to obtain 5 and 10 cm open bands at the soybean terminals. AC 263,222 applied broadcast at 13, 18, and 36 g ai ha-1 injured soybean 14, 16, and 32%, respectively, 3 DAT. AC 263,222 at 36 g ha-1 applied with a 5-cm and 10-cm open band injured soybean 11 and 3%, respectively. Chlorimuron injury was 12% or less for all treatments. Metribuzin followed by AC 263,222 or chlorimuron was not more injurious to soybean than AC 263,222 or chlorimuron alone. Metribuzin PRE followed by 36 g ha-1 AC 263,222 applied in a 10-cm open band controlled sicklepod and pitted morningglory 86 and 92%, respectively, 6 WAT. Sicklepod control was similar with open-band treatments compared to the same rate applied broadcast; however, 18 g ha-1 AC 263,222 applied in a 10-cm open band provided less pitted morningglory control than the broadcast treatment. Soybean treated with herbicides in a band produced yields similar to or greater than soybean treated with the same herbicides broadcast. Metribuzin followed by 36 g ha-1 AC 263,222 with a 10-cm open band resulted in a soybean yield of 2840 kg ha-1, which was greater than any other herbicide treatment and equivalent to the weed-free check.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl3-pyridinecarboxylic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]benzoic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onepitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 5452.’Chlorimuronmetribuzinopen-band treatmentCASOBIPOLA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 608 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1984. Control of annual morningglories (Ipomoea spp.) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chernicky, J. P., Gast, R., and Slife, F. W. 1989. The effect of sethoxydim on corn (Zea mays) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). Weed Sci. 37:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Colvin, D. L. and Brecke, B. J. 1993. Cadre rate and time of application for peanut (Arachis hypogaea) weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:30.Google Scholar
4. Fawcett, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1988. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence-directed herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Grichar, W. J. and Nester, P. R. 1993. Control of nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) in peanut with Cadre. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:71.Google Scholar
6. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Bruff, S. A. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 7:331–336.Google Scholar
7. Kleppe, C. D. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Postemergence-directed herbicides control wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Miller, D. K. and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Influence of irrigation on soybean response to postemergence application of Cadre. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:54.Google Scholar
9. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Webster, E. P. 1993. Soybean cultivar response to AC 263,222 and chlorimuron as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abst. 33:4.Google Scholar
10. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Baughman, T. A. 1993. Influence of cultivation and management strategies on weed control in soybean with Cadre. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:53.Google Scholar
11. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41:523–527.Google Scholar
12. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in selected soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 43:submitted for publication.Google Scholar
13. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wiley, G. 1993. Cadre rates and applications in Georgia peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 46:39.Google Scholar
14. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.Google Scholar
15. Shaw, D. R., Newsom, L. J., and Smith, C. A. 1991. Influence of cultivation timing on chemical control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:67–72.Google Scholar
16. Sherman, M. E., Thompson, L. Jr., and Wilkinson, R. E. 1983. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:622–627.Google Scholar
17. Westra, P., Wilson, R. G., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1990. Wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in Central Great Plains irrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 4:409–414.Google Scholar
18. Willard, T. S., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Habetz, R. J. 1990. Evaluation of AC 263,222 in soybeans in Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:29.Google Scholar
19. Wilson, R. G. Jr. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Weed control in soybeans with postemergence-directed herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Postemergence combinations of imazaquin or imazethapyr with AC 263,222 for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:644–649.Google Scholar
21. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:434–438.Google Scholar
22. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:817–822.Google Scholar
23. Wixson, M., Adcock, T., Muzyk, K., Walls, F., and Wiley, G. 1993. Weed control in peanut with Cadre herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:316.Google Scholar
24. Worsham, A. D. and Saunders, E. M. 1988. Comparison of glufosinate, glyphosate, and paraquat for postdirected, broad-spectrum weed control in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abst. 28:36.Google Scholar