Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:53:25.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Application Variables on the Foliar Efficacy of Saflufenacil on Horseweed (Conyza canadensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tracy G. Mellendorf
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Researcher, Researcher and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Julie M. Young
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Researcher, Researcher and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Researcher, Researcher and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Researcher, Researcher and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: BryanYoung@purdue.edu

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the influence of spray-solution pH, adjuvant, light intensity, temperature, and glyphosate on the efficacy of saflufenacil on horseweed. Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed from saflufenacil alone was greatest with a spray-solution pH of 5, compared with pH 7 or 9. However, when glyphosate was added to saflufenacil, similar GR50 values were measured with spray solutions adjusted to pH 5 and 9, and horseweed control at pH 9 was 38% greater than at pH 7. The efficacy of saflufenacil on horseweed was 36% greater when crop oil concentrate was used as an adjuvant compared with nonionic surfactant, regardless of the addition of glyphosate or the sensitivity of the horseweed population to glyphosate (resistant vs. susceptible). The addition of glyphosate to low rates of saflufenacil increased control over saflufenacil applied alone on glyphosate-susceptible and -resistant horseweed. Saflufenacil activity was greater under low light intensity (300 μmol m−2 s−1) than high light intensity (1,000 μmol m−2 s−1). Although initial horseweed control was greater under high temperature (27 C) compared with low temperature (10 C), by 21 d after treatment horseweed dry weight was similar from saflufenacil applied under high and low temperatures.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

References

Literature Cited

Bellinder, RR, Arsenovic, M, Shah, DA, Rauch, BJ (2003) Effect of weed growth stage and adjuvant on the efficacy of fomesafen and bentazon. Weed Sci. 51:10161021 Google Scholar
Fausey, J C, Penner, D, Renner, KA (1999) Adjuvant effects on CGA-248757 and flumiclorac efficacy and crop tolerance. Weed Technol. 13:783790 Google Scholar
Fausey, JC, Renner, KA (2001) Environmental effects on CGA-248757 and flumiclorac efficacy/soybean tolerance. Weed Sci. 49:668674 Google Scholar
Frihauf, JC, Stahlman, PW, Geier, PW (2010) Winter wheat and weed response to postemergence saflufenacil alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 24:262268 Google Scholar
Gibson, KD, Johnson, WD, Hillger, DE (2005) Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:10651070 Google Scholar
Green, JM, Hale, T (2005) Increasing and decreasing pH to enhance the biological activity of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 19:468475 Google Scholar
Grossmann, KR, Hutzler, J, Caspar, G, Kwiakowski, J, Brommer, CL (2011) Saflufenacil (Kixor™): biokinetic properties and mechanism of selectivity of a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase inhibiting herbicide. Weed Sci. 59:290298 Google Scholar
Grossmann, KR, Niggeweg, R, Christiansen, N, Looser, R, Ehrhardt, T (2010) The herbicide saflufenacil (Kixor™) is a new inhibitor of protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase activity. Weed Sci. 58:19 Google Scholar
Heap, IM (2014) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed January 8, 2014Google Scholar
Kells, JJ, Meggitt, WF, Penner, D (1984) Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Datta, A, Scott, J, Klein, RN, Golus, J (2009) Problem weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybean with glyphosate tank mixes and soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 23:507512 Google Scholar
Matocha, MA, Krutz, LJ, Senseman, SA, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN, Palmer, EW (2006) Spray carrier pH effect of absorption and translocation of trifloxysulfuron in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Texasweed (Caperonia palustris). Weed Sci. 54:969973 Google Scholar
McCormick, RW (1990) Effects of CO2, N2, air, and nitrogen salts on spray solution pH. Weed Technol. 4:910912 Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG, Jordan, TN (1976) Effects of adjuvant and environment on the toxicity of dalapon to johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 24:257260 Google Scholar
Mellendorf, TM, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol. 27:463467 Google Scholar
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R, Szelezniak, E (1994) Sethoxydim response to spray carrier chemical properties and environment. Weed Technol. 8:591597 Google Scholar
Norris, JL, Shaw, DR, Snipes, CE (2001) Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:552558 Google Scholar
Owen, LN, Mueller, TC, Main, CL, Bond, J, Steckel, LE (2011) Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technol. 25:15 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Singh, M (1992) Organosilicone adjuvant effects of glyphosate efficacy and rainfastness. Weed Technol. 6:361365 Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Streibig, JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Software 12.Google Scholar
Roskamp, JM, Turco, RF, Bischoff, M, Johnson, WG (2013) The influence of carrier water pH and hardness on saflufenacil efficacy and solubility. Weed Technol. 27:527533 Google Scholar
Stahlman, PW, Phillips, WM (1979) Effects of water quality and spray volume on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 27:3841 Google Scholar
Starke, RJ, Oliver, LF (1998) Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652660 Google Scholar
Thompson, WM, Nissen, SJ (2002) Influence of shade and irrigation on the response of corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) to carfentrazone-ethyl. Weed Technol. 16:314318 Google Scholar
Velini, ED, Trindade, MLB, Barberis, LRM, Duke, SO (2010) Growth regulation and other secondary effects of herbicides. Weed Sci. 58:351354 Google Scholar
Waggoner, BS, Mueller, TC, Bond, JA, Steckel, LE (2011) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed with saflufenacil tank mixtures in no till cotton. Weed Technol. 25:310315 Google Scholar
Wichert, RA, Bozsa, R, Talbert, RE, Oliver, LR (1992) Temperature and relative humidity effects on diphenylether herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:1924 Google Scholar
Wills, GD, McWhorter, CG (1981) Effect of environment on the translocation and toxicity of acifluorfen to showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis). Weed Sci. 29:367401 Google Scholar
Zabkiewicz, JA (2000) Adjuvants and herbicidal efficacy—present status and future prospects. Weed Res. 40:139149 Google Scholar