Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:52:24.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Herbicide Formulation on Weed Control in Four Tillage Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael D. Johnson ,
Donald L. Wyse  and
William E. Lueschen
Michael D. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
William E. Lueschen
Affiliation:
Southern Exp. Stn., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to compare the weed control efficacy of liquid, granular, and microencapsulated formulations of preemergence herbicides in moldboard plow, chisel plow, ridge tillage, and no-tillage corn and soybean production systems, and to determine whether herbicide formulation can influence herbicide interception and retention on surface corn residue. Common lambsquarters populations were threefold higher in corn than in soybeans. A mixed population of giant foxtail and green foxtail was highest in the chisel plow and lowest in the ridge tillage system as were total weed numbers. Percent weed control was not influenced by tillage when considered across all herbicide treatments. Weed control was not influenced by herbicide formulation in the moldboard plow, chisel plow, or ridge tillage systems, but granular herbicide applications provided better weed control than liquid applications in the no-tillage system and across various rates of corn residue in an experiment with no tillage variables. Two- to threefold less granular-applied herbicide was intercepted by surface corn residue at the time of application compared to liquid-applied herbicide. Increasing amounts of postapplication rainfall decreased the difference among formulations with regard to both total soil reception of the herbicide and resultant weed control. There was no consistent advantage for the microencapsulated formulation over the other herbicide formulations. Surface corn residue controlled many weeds without the aid of a herbicide and actually contributed to overall weed control even where herbicides were applied. This suggests that the binding of preemergence herbicides on surface crop residue may not be the cause of weed control failures in reduced-tillage systems as is often assumed to be the case.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3906′soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Hodgson 78′common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. ♯3 CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFAgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETVIWeed populationssoil environmentcrop residueherbicide washoffCHEALSETFASETVI
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 239 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 36:164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bauman, T. T. and Ross, M. A. 1983. Effect of three tillage systems on the persistence of atrazine. Weed Sci. 31:423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1981. Influence of rainfall on the phytoxicity of foliarly applied 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 29:349–355.Google Scholar
4. Crutchfield, D. A., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1986. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch level on weed control. Weed Sci. 34:110–114.Google Scholar
5. Erbach, D. C. and Lovely, W. G. 1975. Effect of plant residue on herbicide performance in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 23:512–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci 26:594–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Frond-Williams, R. J., Chancellar, R. J., and Drennan, D.S.H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Frond-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D.S.H., and Chancellar, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecology. 20:187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ghadiri, H., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1984. Interception and retention of atrazine by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble. Weed Sci. 32:24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hargurdeep, S. S., Bassi, P. K., and Spencer, M. S. 1986. Use of ethylene and nitrate to break seed dormancy of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 34:502–506.Google Scholar
11. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York. Page 892.Google Scholar
12. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27: 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kapusta, G. and Strieker, C. F. 1976. Herbicidal weed control in stubble no-till planted corn. Weed Sci. 24:605–611.Google Scholar
14. Lowder, S. W. and Weber, J. B. 1979. Atrazine retention by crop residue in reduced-tillage systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:303–307.Google Scholar
15. Martin, C. D., Baker, J. L., Erbach, D. C., and Johnson, H. P. 1978. Washoff of herbicides applied to corn residue. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Engr. 21:1164–1168.Google Scholar
16. Moomaw, R. S. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Corn residue management and weed control in close-drilled soybeans. Agron. J. 71: 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Pareja, M. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1985. Seed-soil microsite characteristics in relation to weed seed germination. Weed Sci. 33:190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Pareja, M. R., Staniforth, D. W., and Pareja, G. P. 1985. Distribution of weed seed among soil structural units. Weed Sci. 33: 182–189.Google Scholar
19. Phillips, R. E., Blevins, R. L., Thomas, G. W., Frye, W. W., and Phillips, S. H. 1980. No-tillage agriculture. Science 208:1108–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Pollard, F. and Cussans, G. W. 1976. The influence of tillage on the weed flora of four sites sown to successive crops of spring barley. Proc. 1976 Br. Crop Prod. Conf. —Weeds. Google Scholar
21. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of the seeds of some annual weeds in the different depths of cultivation and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12:316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Robertson, W. K., Lundy, R. W., Prine, G. M., and Currey, W. L. 1976. Planting corn in sod and small grain residues with minimum tillage. Agron. J. 68:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Robison, L. R. and Wittmus, H. D. 1973. Evaluation of herbicides for use in zero and minimized tilled corn and sorghum. Agron. J. 65:283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Strek, H. J. and Weber, J. B. 1981. Adsorption, mobility, and activity comparisons between alachlor and metolachlor. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:332–338.Google Scholar
25. Vincent, G. B., Jennings, V. M., Gogan, G. W., Studt, D. M., and West, J. A. 1978. Reduced tillage weed control across Iowa. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:91–93.Google Scholar
26. Wicks, G. A., Moomaw, R. S., Fenster, C. R., and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Effect of corn residue on herbicide performance across Nebraska. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27: 20–21.Google Scholar
27. Wicks, G. A. and Somerhalder, B. R. 1971. Effect of seedbed preparation for corn on distribution of weed seed. Weed Sci. 19:666–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Worsham, A. D. 1984. Crop residues kill weeds — allelopathy at work with wheat and rye. Crops Soils Mag. 37(2): 18–20.Google Scholar
29. Wrucke, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Weed species distribution as influenced by tillage and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar