Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:39:50.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Herbicide Injury on the Yield Potential of Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. S. Hagood Jr. ,
J. L. Williams Jr.  and
T. T. Bauman
E. S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
J. L. Williams Jr.
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
T. T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between herbicide injury and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 71’] yield response was studied under weed free conditions at three locations. Reduced crop vigor at early growth stages was not an adequate indicator of yield response. Yield reduction was greater when soybean stand was reduced by herbicides than when stand was reduced to the same level by hand thinning. Yield response was a function of the degree and persistence of crop vigor reduction in a reduced stand of soybeans.

Keywords

Dinitroanilinesvernolatemetribuzinlinuronchloramben
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 40 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akins, M. B., Jeffery, L. S., Overton, J. R., and Morgan, T. H. Jr. 1976. Soybean response to premergence herbicides. Abstr. Proc. South. Sci. Soc. 29:50.Google Scholar
2. Buttery, B. R. 1969. Effects of plant population and fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybeans. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49:659–673.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D. and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
4. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, B. J. 1969. Influence of herbicides on plant growth and agronomic characteristics of soybean varieties. Agron. J. 61:791–793.Google Scholar
6. Koren, E. 1972. Leaching of trifluralin and oryzalin in soil with three surfactants. Weed Sci. 20:230–232.Google Scholar
7. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1977. Effect of trifluralin and metribuzin combinations on soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 25:88–93.Google Scholar
8. Lehman, W. F. and Lambert, J. W. 1960. Effects of spacing of soybean plants between and within rows on yield and its components. Agron. J. 52:84–86.Google Scholar
9. Mangeot, B. L., Rieck, C. E., and Hayes, R. M. 1974. The effect of temperature and moisture on metribuzin injury to soybeans. Abstr. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:34.Google Scholar
10. Parochetti, J. V. 1971. The effect of vernolate, row width, and cultivation on soybean production and foxtail control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:317–321.Google Scholar
11. Penner, D. and Meggitt, W. F. 1970. Herbicide effects on soybean seed lipids. Crop Sci. 10:553–555.Google Scholar
12. Sommerville, D. N. and Wax, L. M. 1971. Influence of incorporation depth on chloramben activity. Weed Sci. 19:394–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Teigen, J. B. and Vorst, J. J. 1975. Soybean response to stand reduction and defoliation. Agron. J. 67:813–816.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, R. R. and Cole, R. H. 1967. Herbicide evaluations in soybeans at Georgetown, Delaware, 1966. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 21:366–372.Google Scholar
15. Worsham, A. D. 1974. Influence of no-tillage planters on tolerance of soybeans to linuron. Weed Sci. 22:340–344.Google Scholar